Nash Equilibrium-Game Theory For Managers-Lecture Slides, Slides of Game Theory

Content of Game Theory for Managers course includes ratiinality, prisoner dilemma, Loyal servant, assurance, credibility, stratigic subtitutes, entry, brinkmanship, negotiation, auctions, signaling, reputation etc. This file contains: Nash, Equilibrium, Entranet, Game, Numerical, Order, Hunter, Bluffing, Pair, Card, Say

Typology: Slides

2011/2012

Uploaded on 08/04/2012

muneb
muneb 🇮🇳

4.3

(37)

129 documents

1 / 50

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
1
Lecture 3 Game Plan
Nash equilibrium
… in pure strategies & mixed strategies
… how NE play arises from rationality
… how NE play can arise from evolution
docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32

Partial preview of the text

Download Nash Equilibrium-Game Theory For Managers-Lecture Slides and more Slides Game Theory in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture 3 Game Plan^ „^

Nash equilibrium^ „^

… in pure strategies & mixed strategies „ … how NE play arises from rationality „ … how NE play can arise from evolution

docsity.com

Nash Equilibrium „^ Nash Equilibrium:

  • A set of strategies, one for each player, such thateach player’s strategy is a best response to others’strategies

„^

Best Response

  • The strategy that maximizes my payoff given others’strategies.

„^

Everybody is playing a best response

  • No incentive to unilaterally change my strategy

docsity.com

Some Prototypical Games

„^

Prisoners’ Dilemma

„^

price war

docsity.com

Example: SUV Price Wars “General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co.slapped larger incentives on popular sport-utility vehicles, escalating a

discounting

war in the light-truck category

… Ford

added a $500 rebate on SUVs, boosting cashdiscounts to $2,500. The Dearborn, Mich.,auto maker followed GM, which earlier in theweek began offering $2,500 rebates onmany of its SUVs.”

-- Wall Street Journal,

January 31, 2003

docsity.com

SUV Price Wars: Outcome^ „^

Each firm has a unilateral incentiveto discount but neither achieves apricing advantage.

GM

Discount

Don’t

Discount

Ford

Don’t

docsity.com

“Red Queen Effect”^ “It takes all the running you can do to keep in the same

place” – Red Queen to Alice

From Carroll, Lewis.

Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland.

docsity.com

Prisoners’ Dilemma Game

Prisoner 2

Don’t

Confess

Confess

Prisoner 1

Don’t

„^

Key features:

  • Both players have a dominant strategy to Confess• BUT both players better off if they

both

Don’t

docsity.com

Prisoners’ Dilemma Game

Prisoner 2

Confess

Don’t

Confess

Prisoner 1

Don’t

docsity.com

Evolution in Prisoners’Dilemma (One Population)

Prob. of Confess in population

„^

Row and Col players are drawn from thesame population

„^

Those who Confess get higher payoff, soConfess dominates the population

docsity.com

Some Prototypical Games

„^

Prisoners’ Dilemma

„^

Loyal Servant

„^

price war

„^

defensive innovation

docsity.com

Soft & Chewy Cookies „^ Supermarket cookies tend to becrispy, not chewy „^ Duncan Hines (owned by P&G)entered with a chewy cookie [1984] „^ How did Nabisco and Keeblerrespond?

docsity.com

Soft & Chewy Wars^ „^

Nabisco and Keebler rolled out theirown soft and chewy varieties:^ „^

Keebler Soft Batch „ Nabisco Chips Ahoy! Chewy

docsity.com

Soft & Chewy Retreat

„^

P&G sells Duncan Hines to Aurora [1997] “This agreement is a win-win. Consumerswill still be able to buy great DuncanHines products, now through AuroraFoods, and we can focus on the strategicopportunities we've established for ourfood and beverage business.”

-Steve Donovan, P&G VP, food and beverages.

Source: Larkin, Patrick. “Duncan Hines Sold: Columbus Firm Buys P&G Brand.”

The

Cincinnati Post

. 8 December 1997,

http:/

/www.cincypost.com/business/1997/pg120897.html (accessed July 14, 2004).

docsity.com

Defensive Innovation^ „^

A monopolist’s incentive to innovateincreases as it faces innovative entrants.

„^

Consider case of

product variety

  • consumers represented as points in a square • they buy whichever product is closest

represents

consumers who buyfrom monopolist^ represents aproduct of monopolist

docsity.com