

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Karl jaspers' later works, specifically his perception of being through the concept of the encompassing. Jaspers' writings, including reason and existenz, philosophy of existenz, and out of truth, are discussed in relation to his earlier work and the influence of immanuel kant's theory of ideas. The encompassing is described as a reality that exists beyond consciousness and surrounds it, indicating the premises of jaspers' approach to the explication of being.
Typology: Summaries
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


The transcendence viewed through the experience of foundering still remained a Being beyond the world and Existenz. However, the task “to experience Being in foundering,” 1 with which Karl Jaspers concluded Philosophy , hinted to Being becoming the focus of his interest in the works published later: Reason and Existenz , Philosophy of Existenz , and Out of Truth.^2 It was probably due to the publication ban imposed on his writings in 1938 that Jaspers was unable to publish his book Out of Truth (1947) until after the end of the war. Many of the ideas appearing in this book were formulated in his writings published in the mid- nineteen-thirties, especially in Reason and Existenz (1935) and Philosophy of Existenz (1937/1938). Ernst Mayer, Jasper’s brother-in-law, who followed his work closely, claimed that Reason and Existenz and Philosophy of Existenz were a preparation for Out of Truth. 3 Kurt Salamun and Gerhard Knauss attributed the origin of the perception of encompassing in the appendix Jaspers wrote about Immanuel Kant’s theory of ideas that was appended to Psychology.^4 They believe this perception constitutes an interpretation of the Kantian theory of ideas.^5 Compare also Urs Richli’s position, whereby the concept of the encompassing is an interpretation of Kant’s theory of ideas and transcendental deduction.^6 In these writings, Jaspers addresses Being using concepts like reality ( Wirklichkeit ) and Being ( Sein ), but the central concept denoting it was encompassing ( Umgreifende ). Although crucial aspects connected to the explication of Being appeared already in Philosophy , the discussion of Being in his later writings marked a further advance in the development of the metaphysical consciousness in Jaspers’s writings. These writings show the tendency to propose an explication precisely for what was for Kant beyond the boundaries of the philosophical discussion: Being-in-itself. Transcendence and the transcendent, extensively discussed in Philosophy , continue to represent in his later works some aspects of Being that are not accessible using the tools of philosophical thinking. However, in these writings, Jaspers’s effort to turn philosophizing itself into a tool for the comprehensive and complete explication of Being becomes apparent. At the center of our discussion in this chapter is Jaspers’s perception of the encompassing, which reached the peak of its development in Out of Truth. Already the immediate meaning arising from this original term of Jaspers’s shows a basic duality: the encompassing is located on the margins of another reality in relation to which it is central, but at the same time this reality is surrounded by something existing beyond it. Jaspers coined the term Umgreifende by combining
the verb greifen , meaning “to grasp,” and the preposition um , meaning “around.” The English term “encompassing” attempts to preserve the meaning of the relation and to indicate the perception of the Being as existing beyond the consciousness referring to it. The two meanings arising from the term encompassing reveal the premises with which Jaspers approached the explication of Being. First, they indicate the basic image of Being as a reality encompassing human beings. This facet is connected to the understanding that what exists for people is not all that there is, and that people turn to what Jaspers called “ the widest extent of the possible ” to understand themselves and the reality in which they live.^7 In this context, compare Salamun’s interpretation, whereby the encompassing is close to the Greek concept of logos.^8 Second, the duality in the encompassing denotes people’s location in relation to it, meaning the perception of Being as existing beyond them. This aspect is connected to Jaspers’s description of people as living and thinking within a horizon that gives them a wider knowledge. The basic phenomenon of the constant revealing of horizons beyond them raises, in Jaspers’s opinion, the question of Being, which is a question regarding the nature or the power responsible for this phenomenon. 9 Third, we can view this basic unresolved duality as a reflection of the philosophical process that Jaspers himself underwent. At the beginning, selfhood was placed at the center of the philosophical discussion, but as it developed, the boundaries of selfhood and the limitations of the viewpoint focusing on it were revealed. Selfhood gradually became an issue of secondary importance, while Being was revealed as a wider and more comprehensive subject to which the philosophizing was aimed. Jaspers expressed the status of Being within the explication of selfhood by describing Being as avoiding those who wished to perceive it as an unclosed whole “enabling a new thing always to return and come toward us as a particular Being.” 10 Jaspers demonstrated the condition of a person wishing to perceive Being when he compared such a person to the Baron Munchausen trying to pull himself out of a swamp by his hair. 11 Jaspers did not perceive Being, which he wished to elucidate in his philosophy, as equaling the sum of all the existing things appearing in immanent reality, but as existing beyond them. However, he stressed that Being’s ability to be portrayed also in the forms of immanent existence is what enables our contact with it. 12 The starting point that is divided—between the existential viewpoint that germinated the philosophizing directed at Being, and the aim to escape it and push the field of discussion beyond the boundaries of selfhood—will accompany the interpretation of Jaspers’s perception of Being I will present below. This interpretation aims to reflect the tension arising from the basic duality in which the perception of the encompassing was anchored, and at the same time to express Jaspers’s wish to overcome this duality in order to constitute a uniform perception of Being.