Download NWCA Equal Protection Exam and more Exams Technology in PDF only on Docsity!
Question 1. Which clause of the Fourteenth Amendment establishes the Equal Protection requirement for state action? A) Privileges or Immunities Clause B) Due Process Clause C) Equal Protection Clause D) Commerce Clause Answer: C Explanation: The Equal Protection Clause explicitly states that no state shall deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Question 2. The doctrine of reverse incorporation, as applied in Bolling v. Sharpe, extends equal‑protection principles to the federal government through which constitutional provision? A) Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause B) Fifth Amendment Takings Clause C) Fourteenth Amendment Privileges or Immunities Clause D) First Amendment Free Speech Clause Answer: A Explanation: Bolling v. Sharpe held that the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause incorporates the equal‑protection component, prohibiting racial discrimination by the federal government. Question 3. Which of the following best describes the “public function” exception to the state‑action requirement? A) Private conduct that is wholly unrelated to any government activity. B) Private entities that perform functions traditionally reserved to the state. C) Any activity that receives any government funding.
D) Conduct that merely takes place on public property. Answer: B Explanation: The public‑function exception applies when a private party performs a role historically and traditionally exercised by the government, such as running elections. Question 4. The “entanglement” or “nexus” test is used to determine: A) Whether a law is facially discriminatory. B) Whether a private actor’s conduct can be treated as state action. C) Whether a classification triggers strict scrutiny. D) Whether a law satisfies rational‑basis review. Answer: B Explanation: The entanglement/nexus test looks at the degree of government involvement or encouragement of private discrimination to decide if the private conduct is attributable to the state. Question 5. In Washington v. Davis, the Supreme Court held that a facially neutral law that has a disparate impact is insufficient to prove a violation of equal protection unless the plaintiff shows: A) A rational relationship to a legitimate interest. B) A compelling governmental interest. C) Discriminatory purpose. D) That the law is overinclusive. Answer: C Explanation: The Court required proof of discriminatory intent, not merely disparate impact, to establish an equal‑protection violation.
D) Rational basis Answer: B Explanation: Gender classifications trigger intermediate scrutiny, requiring that the law be substantially related to an important governmental interest. Question 9. Under intermediate scrutiny, a law that classifies based on gender must be: A) Narrowly tailored to a compelling interest. B) Substantially related to an important governmental interest. C) Rationally related to a legitimate governmental interest. D) Proven to have a discriminatory purpose. Answer: B Explanation: Intermediate scrutiny demands a substantial relationship between the classification and an important governmental objective. Question 10. In United States v. Virginia, the Supreme Court required that the Virginia Military Institute’s exclusion of women be justified by: A) A compelling interest. B) An exceedingly persuasive justification. C) A rational basis. D) A tradition of male‑only education. Answer: B Explanation: The Court applied intermediate scrutiny and demanded an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for gender‑based exclusion, which VMI failed to provide.
Question 11. Which of the following classifications is subject to strict scrutiny? A) Age B) Disability C) National origin D) Wealth Answer: C Explanation: National origin is a suspect classification, invoking strict scrutiny. Question 12. The “political function” exception allows states to discriminate against non‑citizens in which of the following roles without triggering strict scrutiny? A) Welfare recipients B) Police officers C) Private business owners D) Public school teachers Answer: B Explanation: The political‑function exception permits discrimination against non‑citizens in positions involving the democratic process, such as police officers, because these are considered political functions. Question 13. In the context of alienage discrimination, which of the following is true? A) All state laws affecting aliens are subject to rational‑basis review. B) State laws that deny public benefits to legal aliens are evaluated under strict scrutiny. C) The political‑function exception eliminates any scrutiny for alienage cases. D) Alienage classifications are automatically subject to intermediate scrutiny.
Question 16. Which level of scrutiny is applied to laws that classify based on sexual orientation after the Bostock decision? A) Strict scrutiny B) Intermediate scrutiny C) Rational basis with teeth D) Rational basis Answer: C Explanation: While Bostock applied Title VII, many courts now apply “rational basis with teeth” (heightened rational basis) to sexual‑orientation classifications under the Equal Protection Clause, scrutinizing animus. Question 17. In Romer v. Evans, the Court struck down an amendment that barred protected status based on sexual orientation because the law: A) Failed strict scrutiny. B) Was not substantially related to an important interest. C) Was motivated by animus, violating rational‑basis with teeth. D) Discriminated against a suspect class. Answer: C Explanation: The Court applied rational‑basis review but found the amendment was born of animus toward homosexuals, thus failing even the low‑level rational‑basis test. Question 18. The “rational basis with teeth” standard is best described as: A) Strict scrutiny with a lower burden of proof. B) Rational basis review that scrutinizes the purpose behind a law. C) Intermediate scrutiny applied to economic regulations.
D) A test that requires a compelling governmental interest. Answer: B Explanation: This heightened rational‑basis test looks at whether a law is motivated by a legitimate purpose or by animus toward a class. Question 19. Which Supreme Court case held that wealth is not a suspect class and therefore receives only rational‑basis review? A) San Antonio ISD v. Rodriguez B) Brown v. Board of Education C) Plyler v. Doe D) Obergefell v. Hodges Answer: A Explanation: San Antonio ISD v. Rodriguez held that wealth is not a suspect classification, so school‑funding disparities are reviewed under rational basis. Question 20. The “fundamental right” of interstate travel is protected under the Equal Protection Clause because: A) It is explicitly mentioned in the Fourteenth Amendment. B) The Supreme Court has recognized it as a fundamental liberty protected by the Due Process Clause, which incorporates equal‑protection principles. C) It is a suspect classification. D) It is subject to strict scrutiny whenever a state imposes residency requirements. Answer: B
B) National origin C) Gender D) Alienage Answer: C Explanation: Gender is a quasi‑suspect classification, subject to intermediate scrutiny, not strict scrutiny. Question 24. The “Illegitimacy” classification is reviewed under: A) Strict scrutiny B) Intermediate scrutiny C) Rational basis with teeth D) Rational basis Answer: B Explanation: Illegitimacy (non‑marital children) triggers intermediate scrutiny because it is a quasi‑suspect classification. Question 25. In which case did the Court hold that a state cannot require a “good moral character” test for voting because it was a disguised racial discrimination? A) Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections B) Barrows v. Jackson C) Guinn v. United States D) Smith v. Allwright Answer: D
Explanation: Smith v. Allwright struck down the “white primary” that used moral character as a pretext for racial discrimination. Question 26. The “political gerrymandering” doctrine is evaluated under which level of scrutiny? A) Strict scrutiny B) Intermediate scrutiny C) Rational basis (non‑justiciable political question) D) Rational basis with teeth Answer: C Explanation: The Supreme Court has held that claims of partisan gerrymandering present a non‑justiciable political question, not subject to any heightened scrutiny. Question 27. Which case established that the Equal Protection Clause applies to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause? A) Bolling v. Sharpe B) McCulloch v. Maryland C) United States v. Wong Kim Ark D) Dred Scott v. Sandford Answer: A Explanation: Bolling v. Sharpe applied equal‑protection principles to the federal government via the Fifth Amendment’s due‑process guarantee. Question 28. The “substantially related” test is associated with which level of scrutiny? A) Strict scrutiny
Explanation: The Court applied rational‑basis review but found the law was motivated by animus toward undocumented children, rendering it unconstitutional. Question 31. Which case held that statutes that classify based on age are subject only to rational‑basis review? A) Ginsburg v. New York City Board of Education B) Wisconsin v. Yoder C) Cuyler v. Sullivan D) Meyer v. Nebraska Answer: A Explanation: Ginsburg v. NYC Board of Education confirmed that age classifications receive rational‑basis scrutiny. Question 32. The “exceedingly persuasive justification” requirement is unique to which type of classification? A) Race B) Gender C) National origin D) Alienage Answer: B Explanation: The Supreme Court requires an “exceedingly persuasive justification” for gender‑based classifications under intermediate scrutiny. Question 33. Which of the following is a correct statement about “fundamental rights” under the Equal Protection Clause? A) All fundamental rights automatically trigger strict scrutiny.
B) Only rights enumerated in the Bill of Rights are considered fundamental. C) A right must be deeply rooted in the nation’s history and tradition to be deemed fundamental. D) Economic rights such as the right to a job are fundamental. Answer: C Explanation: The Court looks to historical tradition to determine whether a claimed right is fundamental, triggering heightened scrutiny. Question 34. In which case did the Court hold that a law criminalizing same‑sex sexual conduct violated the Equal Protection Clause? Trick question – no such case exists; the decision was based on due process. Answer: No case; Lawrence v. Texas was decided under the Due Process Clause, not Equal Protection. Explanation: Lawrence v. Texas struck down sodomy laws on substantive due‑process grounds; the Equal Protection Clause was not the basis. Question 35. Which of the following best explains why “wealth” is not a suspect class? A) Wealth is not a characteristic historically associated with discrimination. B) The Constitution explicitly excludes wealth from protection. C) Wealth classifications are always rationally related to legitimate interests. D) Wealth is a protected class under the Fourteenth Amendment. Answer: A Explanation: The Court has found that wealth does not have a history of discrimination akin to race or gender, so it is not a suspect class.
C) Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana D) United States v. Guest Answer: B Explanation: Saenz v. Roe struck down a one‑year residency requirement for welfare benefits, finding it violated the fundamental right to travel. Question 39. The “substantially related” test for intermediate scrutiny requires that the law be: A) The least restrictive means of achieving the governmental interest. B) Closely tailored but not necessarily the least restrictive. C) Merely rationally related to any legitimate interest. D) Narrowly tailored to a compelling interest. Answer: B Explanation: Intermediate scrutiny does not require the law to be the least restrictive, only substantially related to an important interest. Question 40. Which case established that a state cannot deny public benefits to legal residents solely because they are non‑citizens? A) Arizona v. United States B) Plyler v. Doe C) Graham v. Richardson D) Hernandez v. Texas Answer: C
Explanation: Graham v. Richardson held that state denial of welfare benefits to legal aliens violates the Equal Protection Clause, requiring strict scrutiny. Question 41. The “political function” exception allows discrimination against non‑citizens in which of the following contexts? A) Access to public schools B) Voting in state elections C) Eligibility for public employment where the job involves sovereign powers D) Receipt of public assistance Answer: C Explanation: The political‑function exception permits discrimination for positions that involve the exercise of sovereign powers, such as certain public‑employment roles. Question 42. Which of the following is an example of a suspect classification that triggers strict scrutiny? A) Age B) Disability C) Sexual orientation (post‑Bostock) D) Race Answer: D Explanation: Race is a classic suspect classification subjected to strict scrutiny. Question 43. In the case of City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, the Court struck down a zoning ordinance targeting a group home for the intellectually disabled because: A) The ordinance failed strict scrutiny.
Explanation: The Court ruled that disparate impact alone does not prove a violation; discriminatory intent must be shown. Question 46. Which case established that the “right to vote” is a fundamental right protected by the Equal Protection Clause? A) Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections B) Reynolds v. Sims C) Baker v. Carr D) Crawford v. Marion County Election Board Answer: D Explanation: Crawford held that voting regulations that burden the right to vote must be examined under heightened scrutiny. Question 47. Under the “public function” exception, a private university that runs a public election cannot discriminate based on race because: A) The university is a state actor for that function. B) The university receives any federal funding. C) The university’s charter requires nondiscrimination. D) The university is a nonprofit. Answer: A Explanation: When a private entity performs a traditionally exclusive public function (e.g., conducting elections), it is treated as a state actor. Question 48. Which of the following classifications is treated as a quasi‑suspect class for the purpose of Equal Protection analysis? A) Race
B) Gender C) Illegitimacy D) National origin Answer: C Explanation: Illegitimacy (children born out of wedlock) is a quasi‑suspect classification, subject to intermediate scrutiny. Question 49. In which case did the Court hold that a law requiring a “good moral character” test for voting was unconstitutional because it was a pretext for racial discrimination? A) Guinn v. United States B) Smith v. Allwright C) Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections D) Brown v. Board of Education Answer: B Explanation: Smith v. Allwright struck down the “white primary,” which used moral character as a pretext for racial discrimination. Question 50. The “strict scrutiny” standard requires that the government prove: A) The law is rationally related to a legitimate interest. B) The law is substantially related to an important interest. C) The law is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling interest. D) The law is the least restrictive means of achieving any governmental interest. Answer: C
