


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An overview of ranking and fractional ranking methods in statistics. It covers four ways of assigning ranks to cases based on different tie handling rules, as well as the calculation of fractional ranks using various methods such as blom, rankit, tukey, and van der waerden. The document also explains how to calculate normal scores and savage scores based on these fractional ranks.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



1
Let y 1 < y 2 < L (b) if Ci < 1
R (^) i = CCi− 1 if TIES = LOW
R (^) i = CCi if TIES = HIGH
R (^) i = CC (^) i − 1 +Ci 2 if TIES = MEAN
R (^) i = i if TIES = CONDENSE
Note: CC 0 = 0.
Fractional rank: RFi = R (^) iW , i = 1, K,m
Fractional rank as a percentage:
i (^) W = i× 100 , i = 1, K,m
The proportion is calculated for each case based on four different methods of estimating fractional rank:
Fi = 4 Ri − (^38) 9 4W +^149 (BLOM)
Fi = 4 Ri − 129 W (RANKIT)
Fi = 4 Ri − (^13) 9 4W +^139 (TUKEY)
Fi = R (^) i 1 W + 16 (Van der Waerden)
Note: Fi will be set to SYSMIS if the calculated value of Fi by the formula is negative.
where
i CC i CC W
g CC i g CC i
i i
i i i i
1 1 2
1 1 2
1 2
% & ' = − = −
−
∗
−
if is an integer if is not an integer
and l 1 , K ,l (^) w∗ are defined as the expected values of the order statistics from an exponential distribution; that is
l W K
j K
= ∗−^ +
∑
Blom, G. 1958. Statistical estimates and transformed beta variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chambers, J. M., Cleveland, W. S., Kleiner, B., and Tukey, P. A. 1983. Graphical methods for data analysis. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth International Group; Boston: Duxbury Press.
Lehmann, E. L. 1975. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Tukey, J. W. 1962. The future of data analysis. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 33: 1–67 (Correction: 33: 812)