Rizal's Retraction - A Note on the Debate, Assignments of History

Reading in Phippine History Assignment on Rizal's Retraction - A Note on the Debate Guide Questions of Better Understanding.

Typology: Assignments

2021/2022

Available from 04/12/2023

cristine-battung
cristine-battung 🇵🇭

5 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Reading in Philippines History
Cristine Angela Battung BSChE1A
Reading 10
Guide Questions for Better Understanding
1. What are four common attitudes toward the Retraction?
Which of this attitude do you possess after reading the text?
The four common attitudes toward the "Retraction" and its bearing on
the life and character of Dr Rizal are as follows: (a) The official Roman
Catholic position insists that the Rizal to be remembered and
honoured is the "converted" Rizal; (b) Rizal throughout his adult life
was a "free thinker and unbeliever"; thus the Retraction is of necessity
a lie; (c) The Rizal that matters is the pre-Retraction Rizal; therefore
one can ignore the Retraction; (d) Scholarly investigation of all facets
of Rizal's life and thought is desirable for everyone has every right,
and also an obligation, to seek to know the facts with regard to the
Retraction.
2. What are the two significant points contained in the
Retraction?
The rejection of Masonry (“I abominate Masonry”) and A repudiation
of “anything in my words, writing, publications, and conduct that has
been contrary to my character as the son of the catholic church”
3. What are the three stages of the Retraction debate according
to Cavanna?
The three stages of the Retraction debate, according to Father
Cavanna, are the Stage of “Concealed Attacks”, the Stage of
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Rizal's Retraction - A Note on the Debate and more Assignments History in PDF only on Docsity!

Reading in Philippines History

Cristine Angela Battung BSChE1A

Reading 10 Guide Questions for Better Understanding

  1. What are four common attitudes toward the “Retraction”? Which of this attitude do you possess after reading the text?

The four common attitudes toward the "Retraction" and its bearing on the life and character of Dr Rizal are as follows: (a) The official Roman Catholic position insists that the Rizal to be remembered and honoured is the "converted" Rizal; (b) Rizal throughout his adult life was a "free thinker and unbeliever"; thus the Retraction is of necessity a lie; (c) The Rizal that matters is the pre-Retraction Rizal; therefore one can ignore the Retraction; (d) Scholarly investigation of all facets of Rizal's life and thought is desirable for everyone has every right, and also an obligation, to seek to know the facts with regard to the Retraction.

  1. What are the two significant points contained in the Retraction?

The rejection of Masonry (“I abominate Masonry”) and A repudiation of “anything in my words, writing, publications, and co nduct that has been contrary to my character as the son of the catholic church”

  1. What are the three stages of the Retraction debate according to Cavanna? The three stages of the Retraction debate, according to Father Cavanna, are the Stage of “Concealed Attacks”, the Stage of

“Open Attacks”, and lastly, the Stage of “major and minor works about Rizal”.

  1. Who discovered the actual Document of Retraction? How was it discovered?

On May 18, 1935, Father Manuel Garcia, an archdiocesan archivist, uncovered the real retraction document. He spotted it while looking through a stack of paperwork in their new fireproof vault

  1. Why were the testimonies of Fathers Balaguer and Pi made under Notarial Act? Is the Notarial Act valuable for any testimony?

Fathers Balaguer and Pi testified under Notarial Act to establish that their statements were true and from Rizal, not someone else. The Notarial Act is useful for any testimony because it increases the document's credibility and admits that a witness was there to guarantee that both parties signed the document and that no forgery occurred.

  1. What are the major arguments for the Retraction? Do you believe in their claims? Why?

The following are the major arguments for the Retraction: The Retraction "Document" is considered the chief witness to the reality of the Retraction itself; The testimony of the press at the time of the event, of "eye-witnesses" and other "qualified witnesses"; The "Acts of Faith, Hope, and Charity" reportedly recited and signed by Dr Rizal as attested by "witnesses" and signed Prayer book; The Acts of Piety performed by Rizal.

  1. What are the arguments against Retraction? Are you convinced with their arguments? Why?

The following are the grounds against the Retraction: the Retraction Document is deemed a fake; other acts and facts do not match well

the Catholic hierarchy represent the pro-retraction party. Because they are all ordained priests, it is thought that their statements are true. Members of Masonry, an institution that fosters fraternity, honesty, decency, and professionalism, are their opponents.