Robust Stability and Performance - Outline | MEM 633, Study notes of Mechanical Engineering

Material Type: Notes; Class: Robust Control Systems I; Subject: Mechanical Engr & Mechanics; University: Drexel University; Term: Spring 2003;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/18/2009

koofers-user-92n-1
koofers-user-92n-1 🇺🇸

9 documents

1 / 46

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
5/13/2003
Robust Control 8
Robust Stability
Harry G. Kwatny
Department of Mechanical Engineering &
Mechanics
Drexel University
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e

Partial preview of the text

Download Robust Stability and Performance - Outline | MEM 633 and more Study notes Mechanical Engineering in PDF only on Docsity!

5/13/

Robust Control 8 Robust Stability

Harry G. Kwatny Department of Mechanical Engineering &Mechanics Drexel University

Outline •^ Modeling Uncertainty •^ Robust Stability/Robust Performance •^ Robust Stability of the

M

-^ ∆^

Structure

•^ Uncertainty using Coprime Factors •^ The Structured Singular Value

Example

( )^

(^

2 2 2

A spacecraft attitude control model that includes the rigid body dynamicsplus one flexible mode is given by the transfer function

2

2 1

A nominal model that includes only the rigid body d

p

s^

s

G^

s^

s^ s +^ +^ s =^

+^ +

( ) ( )^
( )^

(^

( )^
(^
)^ ( )

(^

2

2

2

2

2 2

(^22)

ynamics is

2 Additive uncertainty:

2

2

2

1 1

1

Multiplicative uncertainty:

1

2

1

p

p

G s p

s

s^

s

G^

s^

G s

s^

s^

s

s^ s

s G^ G

s

G^

s^

G s

G^

s^

s

=

+^

+^

=^

  • ∆^ ⇒

∆ =

−^

=^

+^ +

+^ + −^

=^ + ∆

⇒^ ∆ =

=^

+^ +

M-

∆^

Structure

y

u

y

u

(^

(^1) )

11

12

22

21

N^

F^

P^

P^

I^ P K

P

=^

+^



y

u ∆ 11 M^

N =

Singular Values^ Recall a singular value and the corrspondin

g^ sin

gular vectors

of a rectangular matrix

are, respectivel

y, the scalar

and

the two vectors

,^

that satisfy

The singular value decomposition of

T

A

u v

Av^

u A u

v

σ

σ= σ=

is

T

A
A^
U^
V
=^

Robust Stability/Robust Performance

(^

22

21

11

12

22

The perturbed system closed loop transfer function

is

Nominal Stability (NS)

is stable

Nominal Performance (NP)

1; & NS

Robust Stability (RS)

w^

z

F^
N^
N^
I^
N^
N N
N

=^
+^
∆^
−^
⇔^

is stable

,^
1; & NS

Robust Performance (RP)

1,^
,^
1; & NS
F^ ∆^ F

∆^ ∞^

∞ ∀∆

⇔^
<^

Determinant Stability Condition

( )^

Assume

,^

are stable and

belon

gs to

a convex set of perturbations, such that if

' is a member

then so is

' for any real scalar

with

  1. Then the

system is stable for all admissib Theorem:

M^

s^

s

c^

c^

c

M
∆^
∆^

(^

(^

(^

(^

(^

)^

(^

le perturbations if

and only ifThe Nyquist plot of det

does not encircle

the origin for alldet

0,^
1,^
,^
,^
1,^

, dim

i

I^
M
I^
M^

j

M^

j^

i^

M
−^
⇔^
−^
∆^
≠^
∀^
⇔^
∆^
≠^
∀^

Spectral Radius Stability Condition

( )^

( )

Assume

,^

are stable and

belongs to

a set of perturbations, such that if

' is a member then so is

' for any complex scalar

with

  1. Then the

The system is stabl

e for all admissibl

ore

e

m:^

M^

s^

s

c^

c^

c^

M
∆^
∆^
≤^

(^

) (^

) (^

) (^

)

perturbations if and only if

1,^

max

M^

j M^

j

∆^
<^
∀^
∆^
<^

Coprime Factorization

1

1

A transfer matrix can be written in (left or ri

ght) coprime factored form

where

,^ are stable, i.e.,

contains all of the RHP-zeros of

and

contains all of the RHP-poles of

r^ r

G^

D^ N

N D N D

N^

G^

D

−^

=^

=

A^ A

as RHP-zeros.

,^ are coprime, i.e., they have no common RHP-zeros which resultin cancelation. Formally, they satisf

y^ the Bezout identit

y: there exist

stable

,^

that satisfy

or

l^

l

G

N D

U V N U

DV

I

+^

= *^

*^

*^

a coprime factorization is called normalized if

or

r^

r

l^ l^

l^ l^

r^ r^

r^ r

UN^

VD^

I

N N

D D

I

N N

D D

I +^

=

+^

=^

+^

=

Example

( )^

(^

)(^

(^

)(^

( )^

( )^

(^

)(^

)^

( )^

(^

)(^

)^

1 0

2

2

1

0

1

0

An obvious factorization is

Another one is

,^
,^ ,

s^

s

G s

s^

s s^

s

N^ s

D s s^

s

s^

s^

s^

s

N^ s

D s

a^ a

s^

a s^

a^

s^

a s^

a

−^
=^
−^
−^
=^
+^
−^
+^
−^
=^
=^
+^
+^
+^

Uncertainty Using Coprime Factors

(^

)^ (

)

1

(^11)

Recall that a transfer matrix can be written incoprime factored formSuppose we allow separate perturbations in the numeratorand denominator so that the actual plant is

,

r^ r

p^

D^

N

G^

D^

N^

N D

G^

D^

N

−^

− −

=^

= =^

  • ∆^

  • ∆^

A^

A A

A^

[^

]

[^

]^

(^

)

[^

]

1

1

This is equivalent to a system in

structure with

=^

,

RS^

1/ N^

D

N^

D N^

D

M K M^

I^ GK

D

I

M

ε

ε

∞ − − ε ∞

∆^

≤ − ∆ ^ 

∆^

∆^

∆^

= −^

^  ^ 

⇒^

∀^

∆^

∆^

≤^

⇔^

<

A

Uncertainty Using Coprime Factors, Contunued

y

u

(^

(^1) ) 1

K^ I

GK

D I

−^ − ^  −

^  ^ ^

A [^

] N^

D ∆^

D

N N^ l

(^1) − D l K

Controller Design with Coprime Uncertainty

(^

)^ (

) [^

]

{^

}

(^

1 1 )

1

Consider the family of perturbed plantswith some stability margin

The system is robustly stabilized by the controller

if

and only if

1

Robust Stabili

p^

D^

N^

N^

D

G^

D^

N

u^

Ky

K^

I^ GK

D I

ε

ε

γ

ε

−^

− ∞

=^

  • ∆^

  • ∆^

∆^

∆^

<

=

^ 

^  ^ 

A^

A A



Find the lowest achievable

and the corresponding maximum stability mar

gin^

and the

corresp

zer Design onding cont

Problem: roller

. K

γ

ε

Solution to RSDP

(^

(^

(^

)^

(^

(^

)^

(^

( )^

(^

1/ 2

1 min^

max 1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

where

,^

are the unique positive definite sol'ns of the ARE's

0 0

and

minimal realization

,^ ,^

, T

T^

T^

T^

T

T T^

T^

T^

T

XZ

X Z A^

BS^

D C Z

Z

A^

BS^

D C

ZC R

CZ

BS

B

A^

BS^

D C

X

X

A BS

D C

XBS

B X

C R

C

G s

A B C D

R^

I γ^

ε

ρ − −

−^

−^

−^

−^

−^

=^

=^

−^

+^

−^

−^

+^

=

−^

+^

−^

−^

+^

=

⇔ =^

+^

T^ ,

T

DD

S^

I^ D D =^