

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Definitions and exercises related to subgame perfect equilibrium (spe) and perfect bayesian equilibrium (pbe) in game theory. Spe is a solution concept for extensive form games where a strategy profile is a nash equilibrium in every subgame. Pbe is a refinement of nash equilibrium that takes into account players' beliefs and information structures. Exercises for drawing an extensive form representation and finding equilibria for a given game.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


DeÖnition 1 (Subgame) A subgame ^0 of an extensive form game is a subset of which
DeÖnition 2 (SPE) A PoÖle is a SPE of if it induces a NE in every subgame of
DeÖnition 3 (Belief ) Beliefs are a map : D 7! [0; 1] for all decision nodes which satisÖes
x 2 h
(x) = 1
for all information sets h:
DeÖnition 4 (Sequentially Rational) A strategy proÖle is sequentially rational given beliefs if for each player i and information set h 2 Hi; player iís behavior conditional on h being reached maximizes his expected utility given i and :
DeÖnition 5 (Bayesian beliefs) The beliefs are Bayesian given proÖle if
If x 2 h; then (x) =
P (x) P (h)
whenever P (h) > 0 :
DeÖnition 6 (PBE) The strategy-beliefs pair (; ) is a (weak) Perfect Bayesian Equilibrium if
Exercise 1 Consider the following interaction between two entrepreneurs (players 1 and 2) who are working on a joint project and a venture capitalist (player 3) who is a potential investor in the project. First, the entrepreneurs simultaneously decide whether to devote high or low e§ ort to preliminary work on the project. They then make a presentation to the venture capitalist. If both entrepreneurs chose high e§ ort, the presentation goes well; otherwise it goes poorly. The venture capitalist only observes whether the presentation goes well or poorly; he does not directly observe the entrepreneursí e§ ort levels. The payo§ s are as follows. Each entrepreneur obtains $5 if the venture capitalist invests and $0 otherwise. In addition, choosing high e§ ort costs an entrepreneur $1, while choosing low e§ ort is free. Investing costs the venture capitalist $2, but if he invests he gains $3 for each entrepreneur who chose high e§ ort. If the venture capitalist does not invest, his payo§ is $0. All players are risk neutral.
Exercise 2 1. Give an example of a game that has a weak perfect Bayesian equilibrium but is not subgame perfect.