

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Solutions to problems 1-7 from math 185, focusing on the convergence radii of complex power series. How to determine the minimum radius of convergence for a series and demonstrates the process using various examples. It also covers the effect of dividing a series by z on its radius of convergence.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 2
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Patrick Corn Math 185, 7/13/ Solution Set 5 Problem 1: If |z| < min(R 1 , R 2 ), then
n=0 anz
n (^) and ∑∞ n=0 bnz
n (^) both converge, so then ∑∞ n=0(an+bn)z
n (^) converges as well. So the radius of convergence of this series is at least min(R 1 , R 2 ).
(You can surely work out what this means when one or both of the radii is ∞.) And for the second part, if R is the radius of convergence of
n=0 anbnz
n, we have (by property
(ii) on p. 52): 1 R
= lim sup n→∞
anbn ≤
so R ≥ R 1 R 2 (provided this product is well-defined).
Problem 2: It is easier to show that
n=1 nanz
n (^) has the same radius of convergence; it should
be clear that dividing a series (with no constant term) by z does not affect its radius of convergence, so this is good enough. Suppose the radius of convergence of
n=0 anz
n (^) is R. This follows directly from the following computation:
lim sup n→∞
|nan|^1 /n^ = lim n→∞ n^1 /n^ · lim sup n→∞
|an|^1 /n^ = 1 ·
by property (ii) on p. 52. (I’m omitting the proof that n^1 /n^ → 1 here, but you should probably have put it on your homework, to remind yourself and the reader that you know why it’s true–good old L’Hopital.)
Problem 3: (a) 1, by the ratio test. (b) If we replaced z^3 n^ by zn, the answer would be 27, by the ratio test:
nlim→∞
cn cn+
= (^) nlim→∞
(n!)^3 (3n + 3)! (3n)!((n + 1)!)^3
= lim n→∞
(3n + 3)(3n + 2)(3n + 1) (n + 1)^3
Now, if
n=0 anz
n (^) has radius of convergence R, then ∑∞ n=0 anz
3 n (^) has radius of convergence R 1 / 3
(compare exercise V.13.3), which you can check by noting that it converges for |z^3 | < R and diverges for |z^3 | > R. So the final answer is 3.
(c) It is not hard to see that the radius is the reciprocal of
lim sup n→∞
n
) 1 /n! = lim sup n→∞
n
) 1 /n) 1 /(n−1)! ,
but the thing in parentheses goes to 1 as n → ∞, and the exponent goes to 0, so this sequence has a limit of 1, which must equal its lim sup. Then the answer is 1/1 = 1.
(d) It should be clear that the sequence
(n!)^1 /n!
is just a subsequence of
n^1 /n
, which converges to 1, so it must also converge to 1. So R = 1.
(e) Well, we want the reciprocal of
lim sup n→∞
(nn)^1 /n
2 = lim sup n→∞
n^1 /n^ = 1,
so R = 1.
Problem 4: This is a tricky one. Let z = eiθ^. Assume that θ ∈ (0, 2 π). Then the real part
of the series is
n=
cos(nθ) n , and we’d like to show that this converges if^ θ^ is not a multiple of 2π. The proof when we replace cos by sin will be similar. Anyway, we will use a criterion for convergence due to Dirichlet: Suppose the partial sums of a series
bn are all bounded, and suppose that cn is a decreasing sequence of positive numbers 1
tending to 0. Then
bncn converges. (I leave the proof to you; it’s probably in any good real analysis book.) Apply Dirichlet’s criterion with bn = cos(nθ) and cn = 1/n. By exercise I.10.3 (which you can easily get from de Moivre’s theorem), the partial sums of
bn are bounded in absolute value by 1 | sin(θ/2)| , and the same would be true if we had taken^ bn^ = sin(nθ) instead. (Think about it.) Note that we are using that θ is not a multiple of 2π.
Problem 5: Let us consider the coefficients of zj 1 zk 2 on both sides of the purported equality. If they are the same for all j, k, then we are done. Well, the coefficient of zj 1 zk 2 on the left is simply (^) j!^1 k! , because the only way to get this monomial is
by multiplying z
j 1 j! by^
zk 2 k!. To get the coefficient of^ z
j 1 z
k 2 on the right, we must look only at^
(z 1 +z 2 )j+k (j+k)! ; expanding the binomial, we get that the coefficient of z 1 jz 2 k is (j+k j
(j + k)!
j!k!
as desired.
Problem 6: By exercise V.6.1, it is enough to show that the partial sums sk (z) of
gn(z) are uniformly Cauchy (the absolute convergence follows immediately from conditions (1) and (2)). Well,
|sm+p(z) − sm(z)| =
m∑+p
m+
gn(z)
m∑+p
m+
|gn(z)| ≤
m∑+p
m+
Mn,
and since
Mn converges, its partial sums satisfy the Cauchy condition; for all ǫ > 0 there exists a positive integer N such that that last sum is always < ǫ for m > N. This immediately shows that the sequence (sk(z)) is uniformly Cauchy, so we are done.
Problem 7: For all ǫ > 0 there exists a positive integer N such that |gn(z) − g(z)| < ǫ/ 3 for n ≥ N and for all z ∈ G. Now pick a point z ∈ G. Then there exists δ > 0 such that |w − z| < δ ⇒ |gN (w) − gN (z)| < ǫ/3. So then if |w − z| < δ,
|g(w) − g(z)| ≤ |g(w) − gN (w)| + |gN (w) − gN (z)| + |gN (z) − g(z)| <
ǫ 3
ǫ 3
ǫ 3
= ǫ,
and we are done.
2