Munkres Problem Solutions: Continuity and Quotient Spaces, Assignments of Topology

Solutions to various problems from munkres' topology textbook, focusing on the concepts of continuity and quotient spaces. The problems involve showing that the preimage of a set under a continuous function is open if the original set is open, and proving that certain functions are continuous. The document also discusses the concept of a quotient map and provides examples of quotient spaces, such as the space of parabolas and the space of circles about the origin.

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/18/2009

koofers-user-qhj
koofers-user-qhj 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Bobby Moretti
Math 441
Homework #4
11/07/2007
Munkres, §18, problem 8 Let Ybe an ordered set in the order topology. Let f,g:
XYbe continuous.
(a) Show that the set {x|f(x)g(x)}is closed in X.
(b) Let h:XYbe the function
h(x) = min{f(x),g(x)}.
Show that his continuous. [Hint: Use the pasting lemma.]
(a) Let B=Xr{x|f(x)g(x)}. If Bis empty, the result follows trivially, since
then Bis the empty set, which is open. So assume that Bis nonempty, and fix
any bB. Then we have b/{x|f(x)g(x)}, so g(b)<f(b). Let m=min Y,
if it exists, otherwise let m=. Similarly define M=max Y, or in the case
that maxYdoes not exist, define M= +. Then define
Ub=(m,wif there exists an element wg(b),f(b)
m,f(b)otherwise,
and likewise define
Vb=(w,Mif there exists an element wg(b),f(b)
g(b),Motherwise.
These are both nonempty open intervals (or rays) under the order topology Since
fis continuous, the preimage of Ubunder f, described by
f1(Ub) = {xX|f(x)Ub}
={xX|f(x)<f(b)}
must be open in X. And similarly, the preimage of Ubunder g, described by
g1(Vb) = {xX|g(x)Vb}
={xX|g(b)<g(x)}
must also be open in X. Consider their intersection
Wb=f1(Ub)g1(Vb) = {xX|g(b)<g(x)<f(x)<f(b)}.
This set Wbis open as well, since it is the intersection of two open sets, and
further, it is a neighborhood of b. So consider the union
W=[
bB
Wb.
1
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Munkres Problem Solutions: Continuity and Quotient Spaces and more Assignments Topology in PDF only on Docsity!

Bobby Moretti Math 441 Homework # 11/07/

Munkres, §18, problem 8 Let Y be an ordered set in the order topology. Let f , g : X → Y be continuous. (a) Show that the set { x | f (x) ≤ g(x) } is closed in X. (b) Let h : X → Y be the function

h(x) = min { f (x), g(x) }.

Show that h is continuous. [Hint: Use the pasting lemma.]

(a) Let B = X r { x | f (x) ≤ g(x) }. If B is empty, the result follows trivially, since then B is the empty set, which is open. So assume that B is nonempty, and fix any b ∈ B. Then we have b ∈ {/ x | f (x) ≤ g(x) }, so g(b) < f (b). Let m = minY , if it exists, otherwise let m = −∞. Similarly define M = maxY , or in the case that maxY does not exist, define M = +∞. Then define

Ub =

m, w

if there exists an element w ∈

g(b), f (b)

m, f (b)

otherwise,

and likewise define

Vb =

w, M

if there exists an element w ∈

g(b), f (b)

g(b), M

otherwise.

These are both nonempty open intervals (or rays) under the order topology Since f is continuous, the preimage of Ub under f , described by

f −^1 (Ub) = { x ∈ X | f (x) ∈ Ub } = { x ∈ X | f (x) < f (b) }

must be open in X. And similarly, the preimage of Ub under g, described by

g−^1 (Vb) = { x ∈ X | g(x) ∈ Vb } = { x ∈ X | g(b) < g(x) }

must also be open in X. Consider their intersection

Wb = f −^1 (Ub) ∩ g−^1 (Vb) = { x ∈ X | g(b) < g(x) < f (x) < f (b) }.

This set Wb is open as well, since it is the intersection of two open sets, and further, it is a neighborhood of b. So consider the union

W =

b∈B

Wb.

We claim that W = B. For if w ∈ W , then w ∈ Wb for some b. Then we have

g(b) < g(w) < f (w) < f (b).

But this gives us the condition that g(w) < f (w), and hence w ∈ B. We have proved the inclusion W ⊆ B. Now on the other hand, if b ∈ B, then b ∈ Wb ⊆ W , since each set Wb is a neighborhood of b. So B ⊆ W. So B is a union of open sets, and hence is itself open. Thus the set X r B = { x | f (x) ≤ g(x) } is open. (b) Let A = { x ∈ X | f (x) ≤ g(x) } , and let B = { x ∈ X | g(x) ≤ f (x) }. By part (a), we know that both A and B are closed sets, and it is clear that A ∪ B = X. The restrictions f|A : A → Y and g|B : B → Y are both continuous. For every x ∈ A ∩ B, we have x ∈ A and x ∈ B. Then f (x) ≤ g(x) and g(x) ≤ f (x), so f (x) = g(x) for all x ∈ A ∩ B. Since A and B are closed, A ∩ B is closed as well. So by the pasting lemma, we have that h is continuous. 

Munkres, §18 problem 10 Let f : A → B and g : C → D be continuous functions. Let us define a map f × g : A ×C → B × D by the equation

( f × g)(a, c) = f (a) × g(c).

Show that f × g is continuous.

Let B be any basis open set in C × D. Then B = U ×V , where U is some open set in C and V is some open set in D. Its preimage is given by

( f × g)−^1 (U ×V ) = { (a, c) ∈ A ×C | ( f × g)(a, c) ∈ U ×V } = { (a, c) ∈ A ×C | f (a) ∈ U and g(c) ∈ V } = { a ∈ A | f (a) ∈ U } × { c ∈ C | g(c) ∈ V } = f −^1 (U) × g−^1 (V ).

Since f and g are continuous, the sets f −^1 (U) and f −^1 (V ) are open in A and C, respec- tively. So we have ( f × g)−^1 (U ×V ) = f −^1 (U) × g−^1 (V )

is the poduct of two open sets, and hence is open in A ×C. 

Munkres §18 problem 11 Let F : X ×Y → Z. We say that F is continuous in each variable separately if for each y 0 in Y , the map h : X → Z defined by h(x) = F(x, y 0 ) is continuous, and for each x 0 in X, the map k : Y → Z is continuous. Show that if F is continuous, then F is continuous in each variable separately.

In other words, g−^1 (Ug) ∩ h−^1 (Uh) is a neighborhood of x. But x is a limit point of A, since x ∈/ A but x ∈ A. So every neighborhood of x intersects A at some other point. In particular, the neighborhood g−^1 (Ug) ∩ h−^1 (Uh)

contains some point a 6 = x such that a ∈ A. But then g(a) = f (a) = h(a). And certainly a ∈ g−^1 (Ug), so that h(a) = g(a) ∈ Ug. Also, we have a ∈ h−^1 (Uh), so that g(a) = h(a) ∈ Uh. Thus we conclude that

h(a) = h(a) ∈ Ug ∩Uh.

But this is impossible, since these sets are disjoint. We have arrived at a contradiction, so it cannot be the case that h 6 = g. Thus h = g is the unique continuous function extending f to A. 

Munkres, §22 problem 2 (a) Let p : X → Y be a continuous map. Show that if there is a continuous map f : Y → X such that p ◦ f equals the identity map of Y , then p is a quotient map. (b) If A ⊆ X, a retraction of X onto A is a continuous map r : X → A such that r(a) = a for each a ∈ A. Show that a retraction is a quotient map.

(a) Let p and f be continuous maps as defined above. Suppose B ⊆ Y is a set whose preimage under p is open in X. Since the set p−^1 (B) is open in X, so must the set f −^1 (p−^1 (B)) be open in Y , since f is continuous. But then we have f −^1 (p−^1 (B)) = (p ◦ f )−^1 (B) = B since p ◦ f is the identity map, so B is open in Y. We have proved that if p−^1 (B) is open in X, then B is open in Y. The converse of this follows immediately, since p is continuous. Hence p is a quotient map. (b) Suppose B ⊆ A, and suppose that r−^1 (B) is open in X. But note that r−^1 (B) = { a ∈ A | r(a) ∈ B } = { a ∈ A | a ∈ B } = B. So B is open in A. Thus any subset B of A whose preimage is open is iteself open. The converse of this follows, since r is continuous. So r is a quotient map. 

Munkres, §22 problem 4 (a) Define an equivalence relation on the plane X = R^2 as follows:

x 0 × y 0 ∼ x 1 × y 1 if x 0 + y^20 = x 1 + y^21.

Let X/∼ be the corresponding quotient space. It is homeomorphic to a familiar space; what is it? [Hint: Set g(x, y) = x + y^2 .] (b) Repeat (a) for the equivalence relation

x 0 × y 0 ∼ x 1 × y 1 if x^20 + y^20 = x^21 + y^21.

(a) If (x 0 , y 0 ) is any point in R^2 , then its equivalence class is given by

[(x 0 , y 0 )] =

(x, y) ∈ R^2

∣ (^) x + y^2 = x 0 + y 02 }^ ,

which is a parabola symmetric about the x axis, opening to the left, with vertex at the point (x 0 + y 02 , 0 ). So X/ ∼ is the space of these parabolas. Now consider the map

g : R^2 → R

sending (x, y) 7 → (x + y^2 ). Now for any z ∈ R, certainly there exists some x 0 , y 0 ∈ R such that x 0 + y 02 = z. Then we have

g−^1 ({ z }) =

(x, y) ∈ R^2

∣ (^) x + y^2 = z

(x, y) ∈ R^2

∣ (^) x + y^2 = x 0 + y 02 } = [(x 0 , y 0 )].

Thus X/ ∼ =

g−^1 ({ z })

∣ (^) z ∈ R }. The function g is clearly continuous and surjective, and it is clearly an open map. So it is a quotient map. Hence g induces a homeomorphism between X/ ∼ and R. (b) This is the space of circles about the origin. The function g : R^2 → [ 0 , ∞) defined by g(x, y) = x 02 + y 02 is a continuous, surjective map that happens to be an open map. The fibers g−^1 ({ r }) happen to be circles of radius r, for r > 0, and the set { 0 }, when r = 0, which is precisely the set of equivalence classes in X/∼. So g induces a homeomorphism between X/∼ and the subspace [ 0 , ∞) of R.