



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Honey & Mumford's learning styles model, which suggests that individuals have different preferences for acquiring information based on their personality and the situation. The model identifies four learning styles: Activists, Reflectors, Theorists, and Pragmatists. Understanding these styles can help educators tailor their teaching methods to cater to the diverse learning needs of their students.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




ST1’s Learning Styles 2012
This picture goes to show that we all have different preconceived ideas and concepts. Some of you see an old lady, others a young one, may be some of you cannot make heads or tails of it. The point is this: the fact we perceive this picture differently must surely mean some of us acquire information differently. If we acquire information differently, that must mean we learn in different ways. And having different learning sets means one instructional method for teaching will not cater for us all.
In addition, as individual, we might have different preconceived ideas about a certain topic but as a group we can learn a lot from each other and appreciate the different perspectives or points of view which then widen our understanding and learning.
The way we acquire information depends on two things a) our built-in personality based preference b) the situation – different tasks require different approaches (e.g. most people would probably like to be shown and have a go at giving and intramuscular injection rather than reading or be told how to do it).
Whilst the following models are generally helpful, please remember that all people have a mixture of learning preferences and that sticking to a particular model rigidly might ‘pigeon hole’ people who are otherwise quite flexible. So use them as they were intended: as aids to increase our understanding of people and not to ‘brand’ them permanently.
The final thing to remember is that there are no right or wrong types and they are not markers of intelligence ; we’re all different and we all have our pros and cons. These differences are what make us strong as a group: the different perspectives and wealth of knowledge and experience furnished through group work outweighs anything one individual could possibly offer (even if a so called expert!).
Honey and Mumford’s work was based on original ideas by Kolb (1984). They postulated that learners sit somewhere along the lines of 4 different axes AND that the all rounded learner is one who can flexibly perform on all four axes depending on the context of his/her environment ( = style flexibility ). A lack of this flexibility results in learners struggling.
There is a questionnaire to help determine where you sit in relation to these four axes. Here is a bit about the different axes: maybe you can identify yourself without the questionnaire (a very crude way).
Axis More about the Axis
How you might recognise them
Their downfall Teaching methods they like
Involve themselves fully & without bias in new experiences. Open minded & Not sceptical, enthusiastic about anything new. Days are filled with activity. When one activity is dying down, they’re on the look-out for another
Famous sayings : -“I’ll try anything once” -“Sounds brilliant, let’s give it a go” Enjoy the here and now and are dominated by immediate experiences. Their days are filled with activity and are always on the go. When one activity is dying down, there on the lookout for another.
Act first & consider the consequences after. Centre all the activities on themselves! Thrive on challenge, but bored with implementation and long term consolidation (may not finish a job!)
Anything with Activity -Brainstorming -Role Play -Simulations -Demonstrations -Practise -Field Trips -Group Work -Games
Stand back and ponder about experiences. Enjoy observing other people, adopt a low profile. Act on the past, the present and the opinion of others. When they say something, they offer a more ‘rounded’ reflection than others.
Famous sayings: -“I’d like to think about it” -“We need to be cautious”. They often take the back seat in meetings and discussions. They act, having taken different perspectives into consideration.
Thorough collection and analysis of data can delay reaching a definite conclusion. They often postpone reaching a definite conclusion for as long a possible. So sometimes, decisions are never made!
They like to listen and read -Reading -Audiotapes -Video/Film -Seminars -Group Discussion – they love them but often take a back seat observatory role
Observe and make theories. Analyse and synthesise. They think though problems in a vertical, step by step, logical way. Go back to basic assumptions, principles, theories, models and systems. Their philosophy prizes rationality and logic.
Famous sayings:
They’re perfectionists: won’t settle unless things fit into a nice rational scheme.
Because they are always analysing, they often remain detached from the rest of the team. Feel uncomfortable with subjective judgments, lateral thinking and anything flippant
They like to get their concepts right first. -The lecture -Structured group discussion -Question & Answer sessions -Reading – mainly concepts and theories rather than the attitudinal stuff that reflectors like to read
Keen on trying out new ideas, theories & skills. Return from management courses brimming with new ideas that they want to try out. Essentially practical down to earth people & get on with things Like practical decisions and problem solving
Famous sayings : -“There is always a better way” -“ How can I apply this to practice” -“If it works it’s good”
Positively seek out new ideas; always taking the first steps in experimenting. Problems are always seen as challenges.
impatient with ruminating and open- ended discussions
They like to put ideas into practise as soon as they get home. -Demonstration & Practise -Practical Workshops
The model is based on our senses : that we represent information in terms of three modalities – visual, auditory or kinaesthesia. Each of us has all three representation systems but usually one dominates ; some people may be evenly balanced in all three.
How Can I Assess Someone Without A Questionnaire? Well, now you know the definitions from the diagram above, you can have a rough guess. This usually works okay if you know the person well. Otherwise, you could do a couple of things:
Visual Auditory Kinaesthetic Often say: “I see what you mean” “Can you show me how..” “Look, this is how you...” “That seems great”
Often say: “I hear what you’re saying” “Tell me .....” “Listen, this is how you...” “That sounds good”
Often say: “I know how you feel” “Can I have a go” “Why don’t you have a go...” “I’d feel happy with that”
Spelling: If I was to ask you to spell a word would you
Concentration: If you are studying or watching a TV programme that you have been looking forward to, which would you become distracted by
Meeting someone again: If you met someone that you had previously met a while back do you
Contacting people on business: If you’re planning a meeting with a friendly work colleague would you prefer
Reading: When reading a novel do you prefer
Putting something together: If I ask you to put a small table together would you
Help with a computer: If you need help with a computer application would you prefer to
Now, which was the commonest type of reply – V, A or K?
How to Use The Model