Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures using the Force Method, Study notes of Law

An in-depth analysis of statically indeterminate structures using the Force Method. It covers the advantages and disadvantages of statically indeterminate structures, the general procedure of the Force Method, and Maxwell's Theorem of Reciprocal Displacements (Betti's Law). The document also includes examples to illustrate the concepts.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/05/2022

tanya_go
tanya_go 🇦🇺

4.7

(73)

1K documents

1 / 30

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Chapter 4
Analysis of Statically
Indeterminate Structures by
the Force Method
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e

Partial preview of the text

Download Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures using the Force Method and more Study notes Law in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 4

Analysis of Statically

Indeterminate Structures by

the Force Method

Outline

 Statically Indeterminate Structures  Force Method of Analysis: GeneralProcedure  Maxwell’s Theorem of ReciprocalDisplacements; Berti’s Law

4-1 Statically Indeterminate Structures

 Advantages & Disadvantages (cont’d)  Although statically indeterminate structure cansupport loading with thinner members & withincreased stability compared to their staticallydeterminate counterpart, the cost savings inmaterial must be compared with the added costto fabricate the structure since often it becomesmore costly to construct the supports & joints ofan indeterminate structure  One has to careful of differential displacementof the supports as well

4-1 Statically Indeterminate Structures

 Method of Analysis  To satisfy equilibrium, compatibility & force-displacement requirements for the structure  Force Method  Displacement Method

4-2 Force Method of Analysis:

General Procedure

 This will allow the beam to be staticallydeterminate & stable  Here, we will remove the rocker at B  As a result, the load P will cause B to bedisplaced downward as shown in Fig 4.3(b)  By superposition, the unknown reaction at Bcauses the beam at B to be displacedupward, Fig 4.3(c)

4-2 Force Method of Analysis:

General Procedure

 Figure 4-

4-2 Force Method of Analysis:

General Procedure

 Using methods in Chapter 4 or 3 to solve for ∆ B and f BB

, B

y can be found  Reactions at wall A can then be determinedfrom equation of equilibrium  The choice of redundant is arbitrary

4-2 Force Method of Analysis:

General Procedure

 The moment at A, Fig 4.4(a) can bedetermined directly by removing thecapacity of the beam to support moment atA, replacing fixed support by pin support  As shown in Fig 4.4(b), the rotation at Acaused by P is θ A  The rotation at A caused by the redundantM A at A is θ

AA , Fig 4.4(c)

4-2 Force Method of Analysis:

General Procedure

AA A A AA A AA M M α θ α θ

=

0 : requires ity Compatibil ' Similarly,

4-3 Maxwell’s Theorem of Reciprocal

Displacement: Betti’s Law

 The displacement of a point B on a structuredue to a unit load acting at point A is equalto the displacement of point A when the loadis acting at point B  Proof of this theorem is easily demonstratedusing the principle of virtual work AB BA

f

f

Example 4.

 Determine the reaction at the roller supportB of the beam shown in Fig 4.8(a)  EI is constant  Figure 4-

Example 4.1 - solution

 Principle of superposition  By inspection, the beam is staticallyindeterminate to the first degree  The redundant will be taken as B y  Fig 4.8(b) shows application of the principlesuperposition  We assume B y acts upward on the beam

Example 4.

 Draw the shear & moment diagrams for thebeam shown in Fig 4.11(a)  EI is constant  Neglect the effects of axial load

Example 4.

 Figure 4-