SURVIVABLE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM INTERIM ..., Study notes of Design

The redundancy and dispersion of a fly-by-wire system and the get-home-and ... the yaw rate gyro sensitive axis is rotated to obtain an angle less.

Typology: Study notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/27/2022

ekobar
ekobar 🇺🇸

4.3

(33)

261 documents

1 / 373

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
AFFDL-TR-71-20
SUPPLEMENT
-- 2
SURVIVABLE
FLIGHT
CONTROL
SYSTEM
INTERIM
REPORT
NO.
1
STUDIES,
ANALYSES
AND
APPROACH
SUPPLEMENT
FOR
CONTROL
LAW
DEVELOPMENT
STUDIES
Robert
L.
Kisslinger
George
J.
Vetsch
MCDONNELL
AIRCRAFT
COMPANY
MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION
ST.
LOUIS. MISSOURI
TECHNICAL
REPORT
AFFDL-TR-71-20
SUPPLEMENT
-2
May
1971
,
D
C
This
document
has
been
approved
Jor
public
release.
Its
distribution
is
unlimited.
SAIR
FORCE
FLIGHT
DYNAMICS
LABORATORY
AIR
FORCE
SYSTEMS
COMMAND
WRIGHT-PATTERSON
AIR
FORCE
BASE,
OHIO
Re.roducod
bi
NATIONAL
TECHNICAL
INFORMATION
SERVICE
Spingfield,
Va. 22151
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf49
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf57
pf59
pf5b
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download SURVIVABLE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM INTERIM ... and more Study notes Design in PDF only on Docsity!

AFFDL-TR-71-

SUPPLEMENT -- 2

SURVIVABLE FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM

INTERIM REPORT NO. 1

STUDIES, ANALYSES AND APPROACH

SUPPLEMENT FOR CONTROL LAW DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Robert L. Kisslinger

George J. Vetsch

MCDONNELL AIRCRAFT COMPANY MCDONNELL DOUGLAS CORPORATION ST. LOUIS. MISSOURI

TECHNICAL REPORT AFFDL-TR-71-20 SUPPLEMENT - 2

May 1971 , D C

This document has been approved Jor public release. Its distribution is unlimited.

SAIRFORCE FLIGHT DYNAMICS LABORATORY

AIR FORCE SYSTEMS^ COMMAND

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, OHIO

Re.roducod bi

NATIONAL TECHNICAL

INFORMATION SERVICE

Spingfield, Va. 22151

AFFDL.-TR-71-

SUPPLEMENT - 2

SURVIVABLE (^) FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM

INTERIM REPORT NO. 1

STUDIES, ANALYSES AND APPROACH

StJPPLEMENT FOR CONTROL LAW DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

Robert L.. Kisslinger George J. Veiseb

77tis document has beent approicdfor public tcicase. its distribution is ivilimited.

FOREWORD

This report was (^) prepared by McDonnell Aircraft Company, St. Louis, Missouri, 63166, under Air Force Contract F33615-69-C-1827, PZ05, "Development and Flight Test (^) Demonstration of a Survivable Flight Control System." This contracted effort comprises a major portion of development (^) under the Air Force (^) Systems Command Program No. 680J, "Survivable Flight Control System (SFCS)." The work was administered (^) under the direction of the Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, h by Major Robert C. Lorenzetti, Technical Manager.

The report covers work performed between July 1969 and May 1971.

Principal contributor to this supplement (^) was George J. Vetsch under the direction of Robert L. Kisslinger, (^) Senior Project Dynamics Engineer. The authors wish to acknowledge the contributions (^) of B. B. Barnes, H. L. Jeffrie, and D. B. Schaefer of MCAIR, (^) and the SFCES Project personnel of Sperry ?and Corp., Phoenix, Arizona to the information reported herein.

The manuscript was released by the authors (^) in May 1971.

This technical report has been (^) reviewed and is approved.

James W. Morris Program Manager, Survivable Flight Control System Flight Control (^) Division Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory

ABSTPACT

The Survivable Flight Control System (SFCS) Program (^) is an advanced develop- ment (^) program of which the principal objective is (^) the development and flight test (^) demonstration of an SFCS utilizing Fly-By-Wire and Integrated (^) Actuator Package techniques. The studies and analyses conducted (^) to date have suffi- ciently defined the system requirements to provide a definition of an approach to the (^) implementation of the SFCS. The results of these (^) studies and the definition of the approach are presented (^) in the basic report. The details of the Control Criteria, and (^) Hydraulic Power and Actuation studies are pre- sented in report supplements (^1) and 3, respectively. The results of the Control Law Development studies are (^) presented in this supplement 2.

As a result of previous fly-by-wire technology development programs, certain guidelines and requirements were specified early in the SFCS design. Those specifications which are relevant to the control law development study are as follows:

o Model (^) following closed-loop control system, utilizing a blend (^) of pitch rate and normal acceleration (^) feedback for the pitch axis, roll rate feedback for the roll axis, (^) and a blend of yaw rate and lateral acceleration for the yaw (^) axis.

o Selectable neutral speed stability with gear up

o Selectable fixed or adaptive gain operation

o Direct electrical link to (^) control surface for emergency operation

o Center stick and sidestick fly-by-wire (^) controllers

o Roll-to-Yaw crossfeed

o Structural (^) mode compensation

o Failure (^) detection and isolation

o Stall (^) warning through increased stick force gradients

o Quadruplex electronics, sensors, secondary (^) actuators and a duplex integrated actuator package (^) in order to provide a two-fail operate capability.

o Mechanical (^) back-up for Phase IIA (pitch and yaw axes only) and (^) no mechanical back-up for Phases IIB and C.

Using the above guideli.nes, (^) this study further defined the system concepts, requirements, (^) and specific techniques to be utilized (^) in the SFCS implementa- tion. (^) During the system synthesis, particular emphesis (^) was placed on system stability, sensor location, gain (^) schedules, appropriate filters, and com- ponent mechanization. (^) Once the system math model was developed, (^) both com- ponent and total (^) system performance characteristics were investigated extensively. In addition to the comprehensive root locus and Bode analyses

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

V

Anpendix VI Simulation Hardware^^319

Appendix VII Simulation Software 325

References 333

I' vi

214 Aircraft Response with SSAP Actuator for Stick Force 42

Step Input

  1. Aircraft Response with SSAP Actuator for Stick Force 43 Step InpuL
  2. Aircraft Response with Phase IIA Actuator for 44 Stick Force Step Input
  3. Aircraft Response with SSAP Actuator for One Cycle 45 of a Sinusoidal Input of Stick Force

28. Aircraft Response to Throttle Doublet Command 49

  1. 1,ongitudinal SFCS (^) Time History C* Criteria Compliance- 50

Adaptive Gains-NSS (Wt = 38,732 lb)

dC*

  1. Longitudinal SFCS Time History --- Criteria Compliance- (^51) Adaptive Gains-NSS (Wt=38,32 lb)
  2. Longitudinal SFCS Time History C* Criteria Compliance- 52 Adaptive Gains-NSS (Wt=43,720 lb) dC

32. Longitudinal SFCS Time History -Criteria Compliance- 53

Adaptive Gains-NSS (Wt=43,20 lb)

33. Short Period Frequencies for Category A Flight Phases- 55

Adaptive Gains-NSS

  1. Short Period Frequencies (^) for Category C Flight Phases- 56

Adaptive Gains-TOL

35. Short Period Damping Ratio for Category A Flight Phase- 57

Adaptive Gains-NSS

36. Short Period Damping Ratio for Category C Flight Phase- 58

Adaptive Gains-TOL

37. Stick Force per g 60

38. Longitudinal Control System CGmmand vs. Stick Force 61

39. SFCS Phase IIA Lateral Axis Functional Block Diagram 65

4o. SFCS Phase IIA Directional Axis Functional Block Diagram 69

41. Lateral-Directional Control Lau Block Diagram 73

42. Roll-Rate Loop Root Locus (Single Degree of Freedom) 76

viii

  1. (^) Roll-Rate Loop (^) Root Locus (Single (^) Degree of Freedom) (^) 77

44. Maximum Steady State Roll Rates

45. Bank Angle At One Second

46. Roll Rate Command vs. Lateral Stick Force Characteristi.3 A

47. Effects of Dutch Roll Damping on Tracking Performance 81

  1. (^) Yaw Rate (^) Loop Root (^) Locus (M=.5, (^) Alt=5000 ft (^) )
  1. Yaw Rate (^) Lool Root (^) Locus (M=.5, (^) Alt=25000 (^) ft ) (^) 85

50. Yaw Rate Loop Root Locus (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level)

  1. (^) Yaw Rate Loop (^) Root Locus (M=1.2, (^) Alt=5000 ft )
  2. Yaw (^) Rate Loop Root (^) Locus (M=1.8, Alt=55000 (^) ft )

53. Yaw Rate Loop Root Locus (M=2.15, Alt=36000 ft 89

54. Yaw Rate Loop Root Locus (M=.2, Alt=Sea Level)

55. Yaw Rate Loop Root Locus (M=.3, Alt=Sea Level) )

56. Roll Rate Time Constant

57. Roll Rate Per Stick Force

58. Roll Rate Oscillations

59. Normalized Roll Response F-4 With SFCS

60. Normalized Roll Response F-4 With SFCS

61. Normalized Roll Response F-4 With Yaw SAS

62. Normalized Roll Response F-4 With Yaw SAS

63. Dutch Roll Frequency and Damping For Adaptive

Mode Gains (Wt=38,732 lb.)

64. Dutch Roll Frequency and Damping For Adaptive

f (^) Mode 105

Gains(Wt=43,720 lb.)

65. Dutch Roll Frequency and Damping As a Function of

Yaw Rate Gain (KR)

66. Dutch Roll Frequency and Damping As a Function

Yaw Rate Gain (KR) of^107

67. Spiral Stability Characteristics

ix

4

  • I Introduction SECTION PAGE
  • II Summary
  • III Longitudinal Control Law Development - 1. System Description - 2. System Synthesis - 3. Control System Performance Evaluation
  • IV Lateral-Directional Control Law Development
      1. System Description
      1. System Synthesis
        1. System Performance
  • V Control System Evaluation Simulation - 1. Introduction - 2. Objectives - 3. Hybrid Facility - 4. Software Description - 5. Evaluation Approach - 6. Evaluation of Selected SFCS - 7. SFCS Modifications
  • VI Conclusions
  • Appendix I Physical Parameters and Aerodynamic Characteristics
  • Appendix II Longitudinal Response and Root Locus Analysis
  • Appendix III Longitudinal Structural Stability Analysis
  • Appendix IV Lateral-Directional Time History Responses
  • Appendix V Lateral-Directional Structural Mode Analysis
      1. SFCS Sideslip Excursion
      1. SFCS Lateral-Directional D* Response
    1. Sideslip Excursion-F- 4 With Yaw SAS
    1. D! Response Variations With Selectable Gains
      1. Pilot Briefing Sheet
      1. Longitudinal Airframe Response to 5 Pound Stick Input
      1. Lateral Airframe Response to 3 Pound Stick Input
      1. Transition From SFCS Normal Mode to Electrical Back-Up
      1. Transition From SFCS Normal Mode to Electrical Back-Up t 70 Trim Authority
      1. Transition From SFCS Electrical Back-Up Mode to Mechanical + 10 Trim Authority
      1. Transitions Between SFCS Normal and Mechanical Back-Up Modes Back-Up Mode
        1. Transitions Between SFCS Normal and Electrical Back-Up Modes
        1. Pitch Axis Single Channel Failure
        1. Roll Axis Single Channel Failure
        1. Yaw Axis Single Channel Failure
        1. Cumulative Distribution of Tracking Error (While Firing) For
        1. Cumulative Distribution For SFCS Terrain Following SFCS Air-to-Air Task
        1. Landing Approach in SFCS Normal Mode
        1. Stall Entry and Recovery
        1. Landing Approach Using Side Stick Controller
        1. Terrain Following Task, Cumulative Distribution For SFCS
      1. Small Perturbation Equations of Motion Using Center Stick vs. Side Stick Controller
      1. Definition of Axis Systems for Small Perturbation Equations
          1. YF-4E (A.F. SN 62-12200) Operational Flight Envelope
        • 9Z. F-4E Physical Data
            1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.5, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
          1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.5, Alt=25000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
          1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=38732 lb)
          1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.9, Alt=15000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
          1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.9, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
          1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.9, Alt=45000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.1, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=38732 lb)
    1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.2, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
    1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.5, Alt=15000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
    1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.5, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
    1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=l.5, Alt=45000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.8, Alt=55000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Resronse (M=2.15, Alt=36000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
    1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.5, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M.5, Alt=25000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=43720 ib)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.9, Alt=15000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)
      • ll. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.9, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=43720 lb) 1,
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.9, Alt=45000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=l.1, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=43720 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=l.2, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.5, Alt=15000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)
      1. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.5, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=43720 lb)

117. Open Loop Frequency Response (M1.5,^ Alt45000^ ft,^ Wt=^43720 lb)^191

118. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=1.8, Alt=55000 ft, Wt= 43720 lb) 19-

119. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=2.15, Alt=36000 ft, Wt=43720 lb) 193

120. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.206, Alt=Sea Level, Wt= 32500 lb) 194

121. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.318, Alt=Sea Level, Wt= 32500 b) 194

122. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.214, Alt=Sea Level, Wt= 43720 lb) 195

123. Open Loop Frequency Response (M=.318, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=^43720 lb) 195

124. Short Period Root Locus (Phase .A, B) Adaptive Gains NSS 196

125. Phugoid Root Locus (Phase IIA,B) Adaptive Gains NSS 196

126. SFCS Longitudinal Control System Resnonse to a Step of 197

Stick Force (Wt=^38732 lb)^ (NSS)

127. SFCS Longitudinal Control System Response to a Step of 199

Stick Force (Wt=43720 lb)(NSS)

128. SFCS Longitudinal Control System Response to a Step of 201

Stick Force (TOL)

129. Responses For Variations in the Accelerometer Lag Filter 203

Break Frequency (M=.5, Alt=5000 ft)

130. Responses For Variations in the Accelerometer Lag Filter 205

Break Frequency(M=1.2, Alt=5000 ft)

131. Longitudinal Aeroelastic^ Equations^ of^ Motion^208

132. Longitudinal Structural Mode Shapes 209

133. Bending Mode Slope vs Fuselage Station^210

134. Frequency Response of /6S Transfer Function 214

135. Frequency Response of Oy,313/6 S Transfer Function U

136. Frequency Response of 17/6A Transfer Function 2J.

.sof 6 9 S

136. Frequency Response of 6M16S M, Transfer Function 215

(^3 8 )

138. Frequency Response of 6M 31 3/^6 S Transfer Function 216

13 9. Frequency Response of 6M 179/6S Transfer Function 216

140. Open Loop Frequency Responses Without Structural Notch 220

Filter (Phase IIA, B)

xii

I

K]

  1. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick Force (^242)

(M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=38732 ib)

  1. Dynamic (^) Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick Force 243

(M=.9, Alt=15000 ft, Wt= 38732 1b)

162. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick Force 244

(M=.9, Alt=35000 ft, (^) Wt= 38732 Ib)

  1. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick Force 245 (M=.9, Alt=45000 ft, Wt= 38732 lb)
  2. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb (^) Step of Center Stick Force 246 (M=l.2, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=.38732 lb)
  3. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb (^) Step of Center Stick Force 247

(M=l.5, Alt=15000 ft, Wt= 38732 1b)

  1. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center E ick Force (^248)

(M=I.5, Alt=35000 ft, Wt= 38732 ibJ

  1. Dynamic (^) Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick Force 249 (M=I.5, Alt=45000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
  2. Dynamic Response to a 3 (^) lb STep of Center Stick Force 250

(M=l.8, Alt=55000 ft, Wt= 38732 1b)

  1. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick (^) Force 251 (M=2.15, Alt=36000 ft, Wt=:38732 (^) lb)
  2. (^) Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick Force 252 M.2, Alt=Sea (^) Level, Wt= 32500 lb)
  3. Dynamic Response to a 3 lb Step of Center Stick (^) Force 253

(M=.3, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=32500 lb)

  1. Dynamic Response to a 3 (^) lb Step of Center Stick Force 254 (M=.3, (^) Alt-Sea Level, Wt=43720 lb)
  2. Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force (^255)

(M=.5, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)

  1. Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb Step (^) of Rudder Pedal Force 256 (M=.5, Alt=25000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
  2. Dynamic Response (^) to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force 257 (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=38732 lb)
  3. Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force (^258) (M= .9, Alt=15000 (^) ft, Wt=38732 lb)
  4. Dynamic (^) Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force 259

(M= .9 , Alt=35000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)

xiv

- LI

178. Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Tudder Pedal Force 260

(= .9, Alt=45000 ft, (^) Wt=38732 lb)

179. Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force 261

(M=I.2, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)

180. Dynatuic Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Redder Pedal Force 262

(M=1.5, (^) Alt=15000 ft, Wt:38732 lb)

  1. Dynamic Response (^) to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal (^) Force 263 (M=1.5, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=38732 (^) ib)
  2. Dynamic Response (^) to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal (^) Force 264 (M=1.5, Alt=45000 ft, Wt=38732 (^) lb)
  3. (^) Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb Step of (^) Rudder Pedal Force 265

(M=1.8, Alt=55000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)

  1. Dynamic Response (^) to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force (^266) (M=2.15, (^) Alt=36000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
  2. Dynamic Response to a 16.5 lb (^) Step of Rudder Pedal Force 267 (M= .2, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=32500 lb)
  3. Dynamic (^) Response to a 16.5 lb Step of Rudder Pedal Force 268 (M= .3, Alt=Sea (^) Level, Wt=32500 lb)
  4. Dynamic Response (^) to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged Wind (^) Gust 269

(M= .5, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)

  1. Dynamic (^) Response to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged (^) Wind Gust 270

(M= .5, Alt=25000 (^) ft, Wt=38732 lb)

  1. Dynamic Response (^) to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged Wind Gust (^271) (M= .84, Alt=Sea (^) Level, Wt=38732 lb)
  2. Dynamic (^) Response to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged (^) Wind Gust 272 (M= .9, Alt=15000 ft, Wt=38732 lb)
  3. Dynaxaic Response to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged Wind Gust 273 (M= .9, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=38732 (^) lb)
  4. Dynamic Response (^) to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged Wind (^) Gust 274 (M= .9, Alt=45000 ft, Wt=38732 (^) ib)
  5. (^) Dynamic Response to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged Wind Gust 275 (M=1.2, Alt=5000 ft, Wt=38732 ib)
  6. Dynamic (^) Response to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged (^) Wind Gust 276 (M=1.5, Alt=15000 (^) ft, Wt=38732 lb)
  7. Dynamic (^) Response to a 10 FT/SEC Sharp Edged (^) Wind Gust 277 (M=1.5, Alt=35000 ft, Wt=38732 (^) lb)

xv

215. Unaugmented Airframe as1/6R Frequency Response Showing 301

Structural Modes sy

216. Open Lateral Loop Frequency Response with Directional Loop 302

Closed (KR = 0.75)

217. Open Directional Loop Frequency Response with Lateral Loop 302

Closed (KR = 0.75)

218. Open Lateral Loop Frequency Response with Directional Loop 303

Closed (KR = 1.50)

219. Open Directional Loop Frequency Response with Lateral Loop 303

Closed (KR = 1.50)

220. Open Lateral Loop Frequency Response with Directional Loop 304

Closed (KR = 3.00)

221. Open Directional Loop Frequency Response with Lateral Loop 30A

Closed (KR = 3.00)

222. Dynamic Response to Laterpl Stick Force (M=.5, Alt=5000 ft, 305

Wt=38732 ib,^ KR=l.5)

223. Dynamic Response to Rudder Pedal Force (M= .5, Alt=5000 ft, 306

Wt=38732 lb, KR=l.5)

224. Dynamic Response to Sharp Edge Gust (M=.5, Ait=5000 ft, 307

Wt=38732 lb, KR=I.5)

225. Dynamic Response to Lateral Stick Force (M=.5, Alt=25000 ft, 308

Wt=38732 lb, KR= .75 )

226. Dynamic Response to Rudder Pedal Force (M= .5, Alt=25000 ft, 309

Wt=38732 lb, KR=.75 )

227. Dynamic Response to Sharp Edge Gust (M=.5, Alt=25000 ft, 310

Wt=38732 lb, KR=.

228. Dynamic Response to Lateral Stick Force (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, 311

Wt=38732 lb, KR=I.5)

229. Dynamic Response to Rudder Pedal Force (M= .84, Alt=Sea Level, 312

Wt=38732 lb, KR=I.5)

230. Dynamic Response to Sharp Edge Gust (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, 313

Wt=38732 lb, KR=I.5)

231. Dynamic Response to Lateral Stick Force (M=1.2, Alt=5000 ft, 314

Wt=38732 lb, KR-3.0)

232. Dynamic Response to Rudder Pedal Force (M--3.2, Alt=5000 ft, 315

Wt=38732 lb, KR=3.0)

xvii

  1. Dynamic Response (^) to Sharp Edge Gust (M=1.2, Alt=5000 ft, (^316) Wt=38732 ib,KR=3.0)

234. Unaugmented Airframe ay 68/ 6 R Frequency Response Showing 317

Structural Modes M.5, Alt=25000 ft, Wt=38732 Ib)

  1. Unaugmented Airframe ays68/6 (^) R Frequency Response Showing (^317)

Structural Modes (M=.84, Alt=Sea Level, Wt=38732 lb)

236. Unaugmented Airframe -ay,68/6R Frequency Response Showing 318

Structural Modes (M=1.2, Alt=5000 fth, Wt=38732 lb)

237. Waveform of Failure Insertion 325

238. Equations of Motion 327

239. Longitudinal Mechanical Back-Up 330

2h0. Stall Warning Block Diagram 331

xviii