Symmetries of Langrangian, Lecture Notes - Physics, Study notes of Engineering Physics

Mass in one Dimension, Noether's Theoren, Hamiltonian Stable and unstable Equilibrium

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 10/06/2011

strawberry3
strawberry3 🇺🇸

4.6

(39)

387 documents

1 / 8

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Symmetries of the Lagrangian
Adrian Down
September 15, 2005
1 Review
Asymmetry under a coordinate means that the Lagrangian is the same after
perturbation of that coordinate,
L(q, ˙q, t) = L(˜q, ˙
˜q, t)
where
˜q=q+K
and is small.
1.1 Example: Mass in one dimension
L(x, ˙x) = 1
2m˙x2V(x)
Let ˜x=x+
˙
˜x= ˙x
Lx, ˙
˜x) = 1
2m˙
x2V(x+)
L(x, ˙x) = Lx, ˙
˜x)
V(x) = V(x+)
Using a Taylor expansion,
V(x+)V(x) + ∂V
∂x
1
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8

Partial preview of the text

Download Symmetries of Langrangian, Lecture Notes - Physics and more Study notes Engineering Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Symmetries of the Lagrangian

Adrian Down

September 15, 2005

1 Review

A symmetry under a coordinate means that the Lagrangian is the same after

perturbation of that coordinate,

L(q, q, t˙ ) = L(˜q,

q, t˜ )

where

q˜ = q + K

and  is small.

1.1 Example: Mass in one dimension

L(x, x˙) =

m x˙

2

− V (x)

Let ˜x = x + 

˜x = ˙x

⇒ L(˜x,

x˜) =

m

x

2 − V (x + )

L(x, x˙) = L(˜x,

x˜)

⇒ V (x) = V (x + )

Using a Taylor expansion,

V (x + ) ≈ V (x) + 

∂V

∂x

By the requirement of symmetry, V (˜x) = V (x),

∂V

∂x

= F = 0

d~p

dt

F ⇒

dp x

dt

⇒ p x

= const

Forcing the Lagrangian to by symmetric results in a conservation law. In

this case, it is conservation of linear momentum.

2 Noether’s Theorem

2.1 Statement of the theorem

Force the Lagrangian to be symmetric,

L(q, q˙) = L(q + k, q˙ + 

k)

L(q + k, q˙ + 

k) ≈ L(q, q˙) + 

q

k q

∂L

∂ q˙

q

k q

∂L

∂q

Requiring symmetry means that the first term cancels.

q

k

∂L

∂ q˙

q

k

∂L

∂q

This is Noether’s theorem.

2.2 Rewriting the theorem

Consider

q

k

∂L

∂ q˙

d

dt

q

k

∂L

∂ q˙

q

k

∂L

∂ q˙

q

k

d

dt

∂L

∂ q˙

From the Euler-Lagrange equations,

d

dt

∂L

∂ q˙

∂L

∂q

d

dt

q

k

∂L

∂ q˙

q

k

∂L

∂ q˙

q

k

∂L

∂q

3 Hamiltonian

3.1 Definition

Suppose we are minimizing

f (x, x

, t)dt

We can define another quantity,

H = x

∂f

∂x

− f

Consider,

H = ˙q

∂L

∂ q˙

− L

dH

dt

d

dt

q ˙

∂L

∂ q˙

dL

dt

= ¨q

∂L

∂ q˙

  • ˙q

d

dt

∂L

∂ q˙

dL

dt

dL

dt

∂ q˙

∂dt

∂L

∂ q˙

∂q

∂t

∂L

∂q

∂L

∂t

Combining these terms and canceling using the Euler Lagrange equations,

dH

dt

∂L

∂t

If we have a lagrangian that is independent of time,

L(q, q˙) ⇒

dH

dt

= 0 ⇒ H = const

3.2 Example: 1D particle

L =

m x˙

2

− V (x)

H = ˙x

∂L

∂ x˙

− L

∂L

∂ x˙

= m x˙

H = m x˙

2

m x˙

2

− V (x)

m x˙

2

  • V (x) = H

T + V = total energy

3.2.1 Notes

We see that if the Lagrangian is invariant to time translation, then energy

is conserved. The Hamiltonian can be used to prove other symmetries, like

charge, parity, and baryon number.

3.3 Extending our definition

The actual definition the the Hamiltonian is

H =

i

q ˙i

∂L

∂ q˙ i

− L

Usually, the Hamiltonian is usually written in terms of the position and

momentum.

4 Stable and unstable equilibrium

4.1 Spherical pendulum

Consider the same spherical pendulum from a previous lecture. The length

is fixed at R, and so there are only two degrees of freedom, θ and φ. We saw

that one condition for stability was

sin θ 0

= 0 ⇒ θ 0

= 0, π

Now we plug in our possible values of θ 0

θ 0

= 0 ⇒ p = ±

g

R

This leads to an exponentially increasing solution, thus an unstable equilib-

rium.

For the other point,

θ 0

= π ⇒ p = ±

g

R

= ±ıω 0

δθ = Ae

ıω 0 t

  • Be

−ıω 0 t

= C cos ω 0

t + D sin ω 0

t

This is an oscillating solution, which is stable.

This pendulum example is an example of the general method for stability

analysis.

4.2 Example: Pendulum with two masses

~r 1

= b sin θ 1

xˆ − b cos θ 1

~r 2

= ~r 1

  • a sin θ 2

xˆ − a cos θ 2

We take derivatives in order to get the kinetic energy.

~r 1

= b

θ 1

cos θ 1

xˆ + b

θ 1

sin θ 1

~r 2

~r 1

  • a

θ 2

cos θ 2

xˆ + a

θ 2

sin θ 2

~r 2

= (b

θ 1

cos θ 1

  • a

θ 2

)ˆx + (b

θ 1

sin θ 1

  • a

θ 2

sin θ 2

)ˆy

r ˙

2

1

~r 1

~r 1

= b

2 ˙ θ

2

1

r ˙

2

2

= b

2 ˙ θ

2

1

cos

2

θ 1

  • a

2 ˙ θ

2

2

cos

2

θ 2

  • 2ab

θ 1

θ 2

cos θ 1

cosθ 2

= b

θ

2

1

  • a

θ

2

2

  • 2ab

θ 1

θ 2 (sin θ 1 sin θ 2 + cos θ 1 cos θ 2 )

2

2

= b

2 ˙ θ

2

1

  • a

2 ˙ θ

2

2

  • 2ab

θ 1

θ 2

cos(θ 1

− θ 2

T =

m 1

2

1

m 2

2

2

(m 1

  • m 2

)b

2 ˙ θ

2

1

m 2

a

2 ˙ θ

2

2

  • m 2

ab

θ 1

θ 2

cos(θ 1

− θ 2

Now we find the potential energy, given by gravity,

U = m 1

gb(1 − cos θ 1

) + m 2

g(1 − b cos θ 1

− a cos θ 2

The total lagrangian is then

L = T − U

We have two degrees of freedom, θ 1

and θ 2

. We imagine that they will be

coupled. We start cranking the derivatives.

∂L

θ 1

= (m 1

  • m 2

)b

θ 1

  • m 2

ab

θ 2

cos(θ 1

− θ 2

∂L

∂θ 1

= −m 2

ab

θ 1

θ 2

sin(θ 1

− θ 2

) − m 1

gb sin θ 1

− m 2

gb sin θ 1

We will take the time derivative after some approximations.

4.2.1 Summary

There are two modes. The first is the low frequency mode, in which the

masses stay underneath each other, with a small angular difference. The

second is the high frequency mode, in which the two masses will be be out

of phase. We will analyze these solutions next time with eigenvalues and

eigenvectors.