


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A teaching statement by James C. Cameron, where he discusses his teaching philosophy and methods. He emphasizes the importance of mathematical patterns of thought for all students, equity in teaching, and active learning. He also discusses the types of courses he has taught, including service courses for non-math majors. The document could be useful as study notes, lecture notes, summary, or university essay for courses related to teaching methods, mathematics, or education.
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



Teaching Statement James C. Cameron
I believe that mathematical patterns of thought benefit all students, even those who do not go on to a technical job. My primary goals as an in- structor are to teach students how to translate a problem into mathematical language, and to teach them how to focus on understanding why something is the way it is, and to use computation as a tool in doing so. I want my students to learn how to make precise mathematical statements, and how to ask precise questions about the math that we do in class and that they encounter in the world. I belove that equity is a key part of teaching and that it needs to be explicitly and constantly addressed while teaching. In my classes I aim to address the historical lack of equity in mathematics and the contributions of underrepresented groups, also on an individual level I am aware of the radically different circumstances some of my students face, and I try to accommodate my students however I can with empathy and an open mind. I am a proponent of active learning. I like to give low states assessments like reading quizzes to my students, both so I can assess what they are learning and so that they can be exposed to the more routine material before we see it in the classroom. When I am lecturing I have a conversation with the students, and I like to ask a lot of didactic questions and get input from the students whenever possible. I am currently teaching a flipped class, and I am finding that it is successful to have the students learn some of the material such as definitions on their own so that class time is spent doing interesting problems and addressing questions, rather than a one sided output of information. I am constantly tweaking my teaching style and seeking out new ways to address the different learning styles of my students. I attended a week long program on scientific teaching at UCLA, put on by the National Institute for Scientific Teaching, and this inspired me to spend a portion of all of my classes with the students working on problems in groups and to send out regular surveys to my classes; I use these surveys to keep in touch with my students and to help me know what topics I need to spend more time on. To promote group work among my students, when possible my TAs and I will create worksheets for the students to do in groups during their time with the TAs, and I have had the opportunity to work with undergraduate TAs in order to have the students work in small groups with the help of a more experienced students. I have taught a wide variety of classes at the University of California Los Angeles and the University of Washington, ranging from graduate level commutative algebra, to ”introduction to proofs” classes, to calculus. I have also been involved in training teaching assistants, and this quarter I am the course coordinator for the different sections of introduction to real analysis at UCLA. 1
I will now discuss a few types of courses that I have taught.
I have taught many classes geared towards upper division nonmath ma- jors, the one that I have taught the most often both at UCLA and at the University of Washington is liner algebra. I few teaching linear algebra to nonmath majors as a fantastic opportunity to teach the advantages of mathematical thought to engineering or computer science students. I em- phasize both how salubrious it is to be able to trace all our arguments back to first principles, and also how abstraction can let us study very different seeming structures at the same time. However, because linear algebra can seem foreign to some students, I look for every opportunity to give concrete examples: for example when teaching about the span of a set of vectors I use props to demonstrate the span of two vectors in R^3. Even in a class that is mostly focused on matrix algebra I still ask the students to prove things (even if I don’t phrase it that way) because to me understanding the logic around the math that they are doing and why the algorithms they are learning work is much more important than the actual act of computing something.
a part of traditional school curriculums. It is designed to show students that mathematics is alive and fun, and also to teach them how to explore a problem, and then explain why whatever they are trying to prove is so. It is a lot of fun to listen to the kids try to, for example, argue why an Eulerian path of the bridges of K¨onisburg is impossible by going through a laborious case by case analysis, and then to guide them to thinking about graphs and the degree of a vertex. I continued this at UCLA by giving a series of guest lectures on group theory to the high school math circle, and I hope to keep up my involvement with math circles.