Logic of Compound Statements: Valid and Invalid Arguments, Slides of Discrete Mathematics

An introduction to compound statements in logic, focusing on valid and invalid arguments. Topics include conditional statements, negation, contrapositive, testing argument forms, and rules of inference. Examples are given to illustrate each concept.

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/27/2013

ashwini
ashwini 🇮🇳

4.5

(18)

167 documents

1 / 16

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Chapter 1
The Logic of Compound Statements
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Logic of Compound Statements: Valid and Invalid Arguments and more Slides Discrete Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 1

The Logic of Compound Statements

Section 1.

Valid & Invalid Arguments

Testing Argument Form

• Identify the premises and conclusion of the

argument form.

• Construct a truth table showing the truth

values of all the premises and the conclusion.

• If the truth table reveals all TRUE premises

and a FALSE conclusion, then the argument

form is invalid. Otherwise, when all premises

are TRUE and the conclusion is TRUE, then the

argument is valid.

Example

• If Socrates is a man, then Socrates is mortal.

• Socrates is a man.

• :. Socrates is mortal.

• Syllogism is an argument form with two premises

and a conclusion. Example Modus Ponens form:

  • If p then q.
  • p
  • :. q

Example Invalid Form

• p -> q v ~r

• q -> p ^ r

• :. p -> r

Modus Tollens

  • If p then q.
  • ~q
  • :. ~p
  • Proves it case with “proof by contradiction”
  • Example:
  • if Zeus is human, then Zeus is mortal.
  • Zeus is not mortal.
  • :. Zeus is not human.

Rules of Inference

• Rule of inference is a form of argument that is

valid.

  • Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens
  • Generalization, Specialization, Elimination, Transitivity, Proof by Division, etc.

Rules of Inference

• Generalization

  • p :. p v q
  • q :. p v q

• Specialization

  • p ^ q :. p
  • p ^ q :. q
  • Example:
    • Karl knows how to build a computer and Karl knows how to program a computer
    • :. Karl knows how to program a computer

Rules of Inference

• Transitivity (Chain Rule)

  • p -> q, q -> r, :. p -> r
  • Example
    • If 18,486 is divisible by 18, then 18486 is divisible by 9.
    • If 18,486 is divisible by 9, then the sum of the digits of 18,486 is divisible by 9.
    • :. 18,486 is divisible by 18, then the sum of the digits 18,486 is divisible by 9.

Rules of Inference

• Proof by Division

  • p v q, p->r, q->r, :.r
  • Example
    • x is positive or x is negative.
    • If x is positive, then x 2 > 0.
    • If x is negative, then x 2 > 0.
    • :. x 2 > 0

Contradictions and Valid Arguments

  • Contradiction Rule – If you can show that the

supposition that statement p is false leads logically to a contradiction, then you can conclude that p is true.

  • ~p -> c, :. p