Valid and Invalid Arguments - Discrete Mathematical Structures - Lecture Slides, Slides of Discrete Mathematics

During the study of discrete mathematics, I found this course very informative and applicable.The main points in these lecture slides are:Valid and Invalid Arguments, Logic of Compound Statements, Conditional Arguments, Sentence of Form, Order of Precedence, Logical Equivalence, Negation of Conditional, Demorgan’s Law, Contrapositive of Conditional

Typology: Slides

2012/2013

Uploaded on 04/27/2013

ashwini
ashwini 🇮🇳

4.5

(18)

167 documents

1 / 21

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Chapter 1
The Logic of Compound Statements
Docsity.com
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15

Partial preview of the text

Download Valid and Invalid Arguments - Discrete Mathematical Structures - Lecture Slides and more Slides Discrete Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

Chapter 1

The Logic of Compound Statements

Conditional and Valid & Invalid Arguments

Example

  • “If you show up for work Monday morning, then you will get the job.” - p = You show up for work Monday Morning. - q = You will get the job. - p -> q
  • When is this statement false?

Example ->

  • p v ~q -> ~p
  • Order of precedence: 1. ~, 2. ^,v, 3. ->, <->
  • p v ~q -> ~p ≡ (pv~q) -> (~p)

Equivalence -> & or

  • p -> q ≡ ~p v q
  • Example
    • ~p v q = “Either you get to work on time or you are fired.”
    • ~p = You get to work on time.
    • q = You are fired.
    • p = You do not get to work on time.
    • p -> q = “If you do not get to work on time, then you are fired.”

Negation of Conditional

  • Negation of if p then q ≡ “p and not q”
  • ~(p -> q) ≡ p^ ~q
  • Derivation from Theorem 1.1.
    • ~(p -> q) ≡ ~(~p v q)
    • ≡ ~(~p) ^ (~q) by DeMorgan’s
    • ≡ p ^ ~q by the double neg law
  • Example
    • If Karl lives in Wilmington, then he lives in NC.
    • Karl lives in Wilmington and he does not live in NC.

Example

  • Conditional p->q
    • If Howard can swim across the lake, then Howard can swim to the island.
    • p = “Howard can swim across the lake.”
    • q = “Howard can swim to the island.”
  • Contrapositive ~q -> ~p
    • If Howard cannot swim to the island, then Howard cannot swim across the lake.

Converse of Conditional

  • Converse of conditional “if p then q” (p->q) is “if q then p” (q->p)
  • Converse is not logically equivalent to the conditional.
  • Example
    • (conditional) If today is Easter, then tomorrow is Monday.
    • (converse) If tomorrow is Monday, then today is Easter.

Biconditional

  • Biconditional is “p if, and only if q”.
  • Biconditional is T when both p and q have the same logic value and F otherwise.
  • Symbolically – p <-> q

Biconditional Truth Table

Valid & Invalid Arguments

  • An argument is a sequence of statements.
  • All statements in an argument, except for the final one, is the premises (hypotheses).
  • The final statement is the conclusion.
  • Valid argument occurs when the premises are TRUE, which results in a TRUE conclusion.

Testing Argument Form

  • Identify the premises and conclusion of the argument form.
  • Construct a truth table showing the truth values of all the premises and the conclusion.
  • If the truth table reveals all TRUE premises and a FALSE conclusion, then the argument from is invalid. Otherwise, when all premises are TRUE and the conclusion is TRUE, then the argument is valid.

Example Valid Form

  • p v (q v r)
  • ~r
  • :. p v q

Example Invalid Form

  • p -> q v ~r
  • q -> p ^ r
  • :. p -> r