Thinking about Research Paper - Assignment | RHET 105, Assignments of English Language

Material Type: Assignment; Class: Writing and Research; Subject: Rhetoric and Composition; University: University of Illinois - Urbana-Champaign; Term: Fall 2004;

Typology: Assignments

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/11/2009

koofers-user-u5b
koofers-user-u5b 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Rhet 105
10/13/2004
NOTES
Wednesday, March 9 we will meet in room 289 of the Undergrad Library, at 2pm exactly,
please find the room early so you can be there on time.
Thinking about the Research Paper
The general purpose of this assignment:
-to teach efficient use of the library
-to develop habits of purposeful reading and note-taking
-to give practice in organizing information drawn from a variety of sources and in developing
this organized information into a unified essay
-to make you familiar with the conventions of bibliography and source citation
What you’ll do:
-You’ll read about your subject and discover different places to learn more.
-You’ll keep track of everything you do as your research.
-You’ll write the story of your quest for knowledge, incorporating quotations and information
into your story. (Yes, of course, you can write in the first person)
-You’ll create a Works Cited page and an Annotated Bibliography.
-You’ll practice research and documentation skills, and hopefully you’ll have some fun and
satisfy your curiosity as you go.
The components of your paper:
We’ll talk about formatting later, but here’s a general outline of what you should include in your
paper. You can break your paper up into sections if you’d like.
1. What I know and What I want to Know- one page, maximum
-What difference will this research make in your life
-What do you want to know and why?
(As you revise, this first section may become “What I knew and Why I wanted to know more,”
and you may include items you came across in your search that you didn’t initially know you’d
like to know.)
2. The Search-seven to eight pages
-What did you find out?
-How did your quest proceed?
-Share and reflect on the information you found. THIS is the most important part of the second
section, here is where you interpret what you read.
pf2

Partial preview of the text

Download Thinking about Research Paper - Assignment | RHET 105 and more Assignments English Language in PDF only on Docsity!

Rhet 105 10/13/ NOTES

Wednesday, March 9 we will meet in room 289 of the Undergrad Library, at 2pm exactly , please find the room early so you can be there on time.

Thinking about the Research Paper

The general purpose of this assignment:

-to teach efficient use of the library -to develop habits of purposeful reading and note-taking -to give practice in organizing information drawn from a variety of sources and in developing this organized information into a unified essay -to make you familiar with the conventions of bibliography and source citation

What you’ll do :

-You’ll read about your subject and discover different places to learn more. -You’ll keep track of everything you do as your research. -You’ll write the story of your quest for knowledge, incorporating quotations and information into your story. (Yes, of course, you can write in the first person) -You’ll create a Works Cited page and an Annotated Bibliography. -You’ll practice research and documentation skills, and hopefully you’ll have some fun and satisfy your curiosity as you go.

The components of your paper :

We’ll talk about formatting later, but here’s a general outline of what you should include in your paper. You can break your paper up into sections if you’d like.

  1. What I know and What I want to Know - one page, maximum -What difference will this research make in your life -What do you want to know and why? (As you revise, this first section may become “What I knew and Why I wanted to know more,” and you may include items you came across in your search that you didn’t initially know you’d like to know.)
  2. The Search -seven to eight pages -What did you find out? -How did your quest proceed? -Share and reflect on the information you found. THIS is the most important part of the second section, here is where you interpret what you read.
  1. What I Concluded - usually at least a half a page -What did you discover? -Culminate both your search and the information you provide about your search. -Would you like to know more? -Did your argument have limitations you can identify?

Grading Criteria :

-9-10 pages, format as specified on the syllabus. -Be sure your tone is consistent: balance the personal “I” of the narrative with the impersonal account of information. -Cite quotations, paraphrases and summaries parenthetically and in a Works Cited. -Follow MLA guidelines as discussed in Rules for Writers. -I would rather you didn’t use random internet sources. Online journals you find through the library are acceptable. If you have an internet source you’d really like to use, ask me about it first. Media and interviews are acceptable, as well. -Minimum of six useful sources. -Polish your paper like a professional.

That being said, you should avoid :

  • Topics which would be developed largely from personal experience. Since such topics do not require library research, they would ignore most (if not all) of the four purposes stated above.
  • Topics which could be satisfactorily developed from a single source. Such subjects as “How Plastics are made” are undesirable because most information could be gained from a single book or article, thus eliminating the need for consulting various sources. Moreover, the organization of the paper would inevitably follow that of the source, so the paper would offer no real problem in composition. This assignment is meant to take a lot of time.
  • Topics for which satisfactory evidence is not available. “Who was the greater poet–Chaucer or Milton?” “Are women more honest than men?” are likely to be answered by preference.
  • Controversial/Moral topics. They are too comprehensive to be dealt with in a ten-page paper. Giving reasons for or against a proposal, without careful consideration of all the evidence on both sides of the question often results in an irresponsible and undisciplined paper.
  • Topics chosen from past research experiences. I want you to learn about something new, if you come into this project with already cultivated ideas your argument will likely be naive and incomplete.