Website Evaluation Parameters required in evaluating an website, Study Guides, Projects, Research of Research Methodology

How to select a good website for your good content selection

Typology: Study Guides, Projects, Research

2018/2019

Uploaded on 12/14/2019

sai-vandana
sai-vandana 🇮🇳

1 document

1 / 12

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
FUNDAMENTS OF RESEARCH-
GEN530
SUBMITTED TO
DR.KAVITA
SUBMITTED BY
V.SAI VANDANA
KI9DS07-11910252
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Website Evaluation Parameters required in evaluating an website and more Study Guides, Projects, Research Research Methodology in PDF only on Docsity!

FUNDAMENTS OF RESEARCH-

GEN

SUBMITTED TO

DR.KAVITA

SUBMITTED BY

V.SAI VANDANA

KI9DS07-

WEBSITE EVALUATION

ABSTRACT:

The Web provides access to the some excellent information and some which is out of date, unsupported or just wrong! How can you tell which are good sites? When using Internet, you must remember that it lacks any kind of control and it is not regulated in any way. The burden of determining the value of information found on the Internet is only the user. Whenever you do research –especially legal research –you must evaluate the information you find before you rely on it. We know it is very significant to evaluate information for any format present on the Internet. Evaluation is particularly done for the information present on the web. Anybody can publish or write any content or information on the web for very little cost and can do many faults like grammar mistakes and can fall under some limitations. Explicit destinations were to spot significant convenience issues and supply an establishment for future advancement work. The online examination systems received all through the investigation speak to 3 significant classes: ease of use testing, client input and use learning. Results showed that English information on site is inadequate, design and style of English individuals landing page must be constrained to be improved, and furthermore the nature of English individual’s examination pages fluctuated drastically. A few sites were of high ordinary, empowering quick access to ebb and flow examination and fortifying the colleges finished as a top quality college directing world's driving exploration. Various sites were a convenience calamity, giving poor client fulfillment and adversely contacting the nature of the college. The investigation prescribes making partner improvement in content, structure, design and new innovation, it's important to figure intimately with the schools and foundations on a 'case by case' premise, and finally to support site execution. Key words: Website evaluation, university website, homepage, research pages

OBJECTIVES:

Website Evaluation is meant for finding out the website which is more accurate and how much content is valid and used for finding out our topic. The researcher who wants to find out the topic or information he needed he has to prefer all the websites. This website helps the researcher to find out which website is relevant to his topic and where he can get his information particularly from which website. Particularly building up the reasonable site quality measurements and recognizes every quality trademark, sub-trademark and quantifiable measures. There are critical to characterize the feel and notoriety attributes, and actualize the site assessment approach. At long last, a site will be estimated by a robotized procedure apparatus. Specifically, this theory plans in addressing the following contents in website evaluation  This is useful in analyzing the present site on the internet, ordering new quality highlights or components, characterizing the new site assessment criteria.  Proposing another methodology for site assessment, that can gauge a site step by step. Quality criteria are deliberately neglected in this examination (for instance common sense or time factors). Since this assessment base on how well the site underpins client errands which are primarily identified with client get to prerequisites and desire.  Before depending on the information which is given by website, inspect and understand the resolve of website. This resolved website does not affect the accuracy of the content or information present in the website  Websites which are used by Educational or governmental institutions .These websites are the one which is having more consistency than other confidential websites. But governmental websites may sometimes varies.

 Some of the questions which we have to raise before surfing the website .They are:

  1. Finding out the responsibility for website by using URL’s
  2. Finding out the responsibility for website by using Authors
  3. Finding out the Clear Purpose and Valid Reason for the Website
  4. Establishing the Origin of the Document
  5. Others Opinion about the Particular Website

1. Finding out the responsibility of website by using URL’s:

URL’s contains the name and the category of organization who is handling that website. The category of Organization is founded by URL’s which is having two lettered country code and three lettered domain name. Some of the examples are: Domain Domain Name Sample Address .edu Educational site https://lpu.edu.in .gov Governmental site https://india.gov.in .com Commercial site https://domain.com

2. Finding Out the Responsibility of Website by Using Authors:

To find out the author or organization responsible for the content present in the page .These following information are used

 License:

Author for Organization and what kind of qualifications does he have?

 Address of the Author:

The Address of the author is present at the end of the webpage.

Ganchev et al (2007). He wrote the paper in 2007 and explained about the important tools e-Learning System. This paper mainly contains a main two groups for evaluating a website such as

  1. General Criteria (Software Product)
  2. SCORM(Tools with present learning products) Ketabchi et al (2008). This Paper have published in the year 2008 which gives the clear information about Online learning courses and how that has to be arranged in a particular model. This paper helps in finding out the four parameters like:
  3. Content related
  4. Communicative related
  5. Evaluation related
  6. Learning Management System related. Paechter et al (2010).After this article this paper helped in introducing the e-Learning system in Australia. They find interest in students about their implementation. After that they have conducted surveys on 2196 students from 26 universities in Australia to find out their response from the students. Depending on the information they have collected have proved them that they have achieved in obtaining their result. Hasan and Abuelrub (2011).This paper clearly talks about the Quality of the website and what kind of services that site has to provide. Here in order achieve quality they have worked on the four factors, they are: 1.Content quality
  7. Organization quality
  8. Design quality
  9. User Friendly quality Shrivastava et al (2012.). He is the one who have analyzed the parameters and sub parameters for finding the quality of website. This paper totally works on the specified domain of the website on which it belongs to. Finally the authors of this paper have validated with the six parameters which are compulsory needed for the website:
  1. Usability
  2. Functionality
  3. Reliability
  4. Efficiency Singh et al (2014).This paper explains us about how welly we can manner all the contents of website in a perfect manner which can be easily understandable to user.

CRITERIAS FOR WEBSITE QUALITY:

Website can be considered only when it meets all the following criteria’s. They are mentioned below in order to find out how reliable our website is.

  1. Accuracy (How Accurate the website is?)
  2. Authority (Who is authorized for the particular Website?)
  3. Objectivity (What kind of objectives that particular website has to meet?)
  4. Coverage (How much space that website is covered?)
  5. Timeliness (Has to be updated according to time)
  6. Currency (Checking for website is for free or asking for any money)

1.Accuracy:

Before depending on any information you needed we need to check for whether the website is more accurate. Most of the website contains mistakes which leads for false researching content. Most of the websites which are updated leads to dead links which may not help for researcher. Always make sure that the information is verified on which you want to work on it. This is can be done by crosschecking the two or more websites. If the same content or information present on two websites that means you are on a right path in getting information. We should be very cautious in finding the information from the website.

Legal sources are sources which is having patent rights and can be opened only when registered or paid to that website. This kind of sources are mostly used by IT Consultancies, Teachers, and Software industries.

3. Objectivity:

The website must meet all the objectives that the author is mentioned like: How accurate the website is? The details are completely filled or not. In this objectivity defines with a 4.perfect scenario of example is when an organization or institution files a case against a government that documents also makes available on the website. That type of documents are very difficult to find on free websites. This website differentiate the differences between the facts or truths with the present facts. All the organizations are very cautious in putting their point of view on the website.

4. Coverage:

This term explains about how many useful contents are present on the particular website. This Coverage term depends on the laws and where the particular content need to be placed on the website. A best example for the Coverage term is when we are doing a researching on the topic like Case law research there we should have to access all the court opinions from the particular court have to be mentioned on the website. When a person is working on the statutory research, he need to access all the Statues in present. This explains that all you have to start with a statutory code. This means you need to update your research according laws passed.

5. Timeliness:

At the end you need to evaluate the information for currency. The webpage which you found last is updated or not? The Websites which are publishing by government are not complete and more accurate.one will always find the errors and dead links on the government

website. These website are evaluated and should be kept updated.eg. (http://www.cynthiasays.com/fulloptions.asp)

6. Currency:

Finding out for date when the website was last updated? The links which are provided on the website are up-to-date?

CONCLUSIONS:

It proposed a site quality estimations which joined a site appraisal structure, which means of each site quality criteria and site evaluation estimation. Finally a site evaluation mechanical assembly is developed to normally assessments and figure the idea of a site. From the start, web evaluation must clarify the appraisal goals and the proposed customer viewpoint, and thereafter portray a web evaluation framework. For instance, the ISO quality model embraced characteristics and attributes that modify differing web applications. The hugeness of the web evaluation framework has been proposed by three-level structures, which are quality characteristics, quality sub-characteristics and quantifiable criteria (pointers). In the primary level, the web appraisal structure proposed five quality traits which included Esthetics, Ease of Use, Multimedia, Rich Content and Reputation. Style and Reputation are the guideline parts of this assessment. The subsequent level trademark is isolated by a couple of Sub-characteristics. Each Sub-trademark is procured from parental quality traits, in any case just Esthetics and Ease of Use have Sub- characteristics, and others, for instance, Multimedia, Rich Content and Reputation are genuinely isolated into the third level – quantifiable markers.

REFERENCES:

[1] B. Yen, P. Jen-Hwa Hu and M. Wang, “An analytical Approach for Effective Website Design: A Framework for Modelling, Evaluation and Enhancement”, Publisher Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Summer 2007, pp 159-