



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
"Patriarchy is a form of mental, social, spiritual, economic and political organization/structuring of society produced by the gradual institutionalization of ...
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




By Alda Facio Translated from the Spanish by Michael Solis 2013
The concept of Patriarchy itself is not a contribution of feminist theories. Many social scientists in the nineteenth century wrote about it as a more civilized or complex form of organization compared to the primitive matriarchies^1. Engels referred to it as the earliest system of domination establishing that Patriarchy is “the world historical defeat of the female sex.”^2 In this sense, it is said that Patriarchy was a form of political organization that distributed power unequally between men and women to the detriment of women. The Royal Academy of the Spanish Language Dictionary defines
Feminist theories updated and expanded the understanding of Patriarchy in the second half of the twentieth century. In fact, the social sciences had left it behind precisely because it was considered only to apply to and characterize ancient civilizations. But for many feminists, Patriarchy is much more than civilizations that
On the contrary, most forms of feminism characterize Patriarchy as a present day unjust social system that subordinates, discriminates or is oppressive to women. As Carole Pateman writes, "The patriarchal construction of the difference between masculinity and femininity is the political difference between freedom and subjection."^3 For me, the concept of Patriarchy includes all the socio-political mechanisms, which I call Patriarchal Institutions, which reproduce and exert male dominance over women. Feminist theory typically characterizes Patriarchy as a social construction, which can be overcome by revealing and critically analyzing its manifestations^4 and institutions. Fixating on real and perceived biological differences between the two recognized sexes^5 , men justify their domination on the basis of an alleged biological inferiority of women. Both feminist and non feminist thinkers recognize that Patriarchy has its historical origins in the family, the leadership (legal and practical) of which is exercised
(^1) There is now evidence that the matriarchies these scientists were talking about were not “matriarchies” in the strict sense of the word but matrilineal or matrifocal forms of social organization. While recognizing that there is considerable variation in the role that gender plays in human societies, there are no known human examples of strictly matriarchal cultures. There are a number of societies that have been shown to be matrilineal, matrifocal, matrilocal or gynocentric, especially among indigenous tribal groups. Some hunter- gatherer groups have been characterized as largely egalitarian. 2 3 See Engels, Frederic, The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (1884). 4 Pateman, Carole (1988).The Sexual Contract, Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 207. See for example, Tickner, Ann J. (2001). "Patriarchy".Routledge Encyclopedia of International Political Economy: Entries P-Z. Taylor & Francis. pp. 1197 5 – 1198. Most models of Patriarchy only recognize the existence of two distinct and dichotomous biological sexes.
by the father and is projected to the entire social order – an order that is maintained and reinforced by different mechanisms/institutions, among them the Institution of Male Solidarity. Through this institution, men as a social category, individually and collectively oppress all women as a social category, but also oppress women individually in different ways, appropriating women’s reproductive and productive force and controlling their bodies, minds, sexuality and spirituality mainly through "peaceful" means such as the law and religion. However, often these peaceful means are reinforced through the use of physical, sexual, and/or psychological violence. Combining all of these elements of Patriarchy, I define it as:
Patriarchy is not natural, has not always existed, and is not identical in all cultures and in all generations. This, in turn, means that although men have power over women in all institutions considered important in each society, it does not mean that women do not have any power or rights, influence or resources, nor does it means that all women have or exert the same power. Moreover, as Patriarchy becomes more sophisticated, more women of specific groups are allowed access to certain institutions, although they are almost never the most powerful people within those institutions.
sexual and other relations between the two sexes recognized as such by Patriarchy, are political relations, through which men dominate women.
agreement between each member of a community that women and everything relating to women is worth less than men and everything relating to men. We see this reflected in the Institution of Sexist Language, which establishes the feminine as "the other" and the male as the norm and that which represents or contains the feminine. By "consensus", I also make reference to an ideology and its expression in language that explicitly devalues women, assigning them, their roles, their work, their products and their social environment less worth and/or power than that assigned to men.
privileged area of capitalist Patriarchy), while the wife´s production is not. In this way, all of the wife’s work in the non-privileged private space of the nuclear family is invisibilized. Some aspects, elements or characteristics of modern Patriarchy are the following:
reality into two dichotomous categories placing all of perceived reality either into things and acts associated with nature or things and acts produced by culture. Furthermore, everything placed within the category “culture” is overvalued while everything associated with nature is undervalued. By situating men and the masculine under the higher category of culture, and woman and the feminine under the less valued category of nature, “man” and masculinity become the parameter, model or paradigm of humanity, while the subordination of women is justified based on their alleged inferior "natural roles".