Download Wireless Communication: Amplitude Driven vs. Radio Waves and more Slides Computer Networks in PDF only on Docsity!
Wireless Communications
1 - Wireless Spectrum
http://et.nmsu.edu/~etti/spring97/techtips/spectrum.html
Infrared Light - Positive Options
- Inexpensive
- Compatible with fiber-optic links
- Not bandwidth limited
- No licensing required (FCC)
- Transmissions may be aimed (1 to 2 kilometers)
- Transmissions may be omni-directional (30-60 feet)
- Amplitude driven – little interference
- Range of 1-2 kilometers (approximately ½ to 1 ½ miles)
- Highest bandwidth and throughput
- InfraLAN – product with infrared transmission
Infrared Light – Negative Aspects
- Spectrum is shared with the sun and other lighting sources
- LAN may become “useless” with enough interference
- Signals will not permeate opaque objects (walls, dividers,etc)
Microwave - Positive Options
- Higher throughput without spread spectrum
- 5.8ghz band – using a narrow-band transmission
- RadioLAN - product using microwave transmission
Microwave – Negative Aspects
- Expensive to build infrastructure
- Must operate at less than 500 milliwatts (strict FCC regulations)
- Not commonly used – less available knowledge pool
Radio Waves - Positive Options
- Commonly understood technology
- Not subject to interference of light waves like infrared
- Less expensive than microwave
- Long-range medium – several architectures exist
- Commonly used – larger knowledge pool
- WaveLAN, BreezeNet pro, Proxim Rangelan2, & RadioLAN
Radio Waves – Negative Aspects
- Spread spectrum technology – high overhead
- Lower rates of data transmissions – due to overhead required
- Subject to some interference – causing delays in transmission
Radio Waves – Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum (DSSS)
- Spreads signal over a band (Example, 50 MHz)
- Random Binary String Modulates the Transmission Signal
- String is known as a “Spreading Code”
- Bits are mapped out as “chips” and mapped back as “bits”
- Spreading Ratio – The number of “chips” per bit
DSSS Spreading Ratios
- Higher Ratios Resist Interference Better
- Lower ratios allow for use of more bandwidth
- FCC dictates spreading ratios must be more than ten
- IEEE 802.1 standard requires a spreading ratio of eleven
- Sender & Receiver must synchronize to the spreading code
- Orthogonal spreading codes allow sharing of the band between LANs
- DSSS systems use wide subchannels, limiting LANs possible
- Recovery is faster with DSSS due to ability to spread the signal over a wider band
- Example Product = WaveLAN
Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum (FHSS) (Continued)
- Used by military and law enforcement
- Jamming is very difficult as the whole band must be jammed
- Orthogonal hopping sequence allows for co-location of
multiple LANs
- Allows for more co-located LANs than DSSS
- Common new product method for wireless
- Product Example = BreezeNet
Multipath Interference
- Interference caused by signals bouncing off of physical objects and arriving at a receiver at differing times
- Multipath is a problem for all wireless modes
- DHSS resists the issue by hopping to other frequencies
- Anti-Multipath algorithms exist to resist the problem
- Rayleigh fading is a subset of Multipath and can completely cancel out the signal
- Infrared resists Rayleigh fading due to small wavelengths
End Of Module
2 - Examples of Wireless protocols and technologies
The two main protocols and technologies discussed in this sections
are:
- Wireless ATM
- Wireless Application protocol