Working Memory - Lecture Notes | PSY 400, Study notes of Psychology

Material Type: Notes; Class: Selected Topics; Subject: Psychology; University: Syracuse University; Term: Spring 2005;

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 08/09/2009

koofers-user-kl0
koofers-user-kl0 🇺🇸

10 documents

1 / 128

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Working Memory
PSY 400, Human Memory
February 22, 2005
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32
pf33
pf34
pf35
pf36
pf37
pf38
pf39
pf3a
pf3b
pf3c
pf3d
pf3e
pf3f
pf40
pf41
pf42
pf43
pf44
pf45
pf46
pf47
pf48
pf49
pf4a
pf4b
pf4c
pf4d
pf4e
pf4f
pf50
pf51
pf52
pf53
pf54
pf55
pf56
pf57
pf58
pf59
pf5a
pf5b
pf5c
pf5d
pf5e
pf5f
pf60
pf61
pf62
pf63
pf64

Partial preview of the text

Download Working Memory - Lecture Notes | PSY 400 and more Study notes Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

Working Memory

PSY 400, Human Memory

February 22, 2005

Housekeeping

  • You should have done the Sternberg task by now.
  • Sternberg experiment report due 3/1.
  • Hope to get you something back by Thursday.

Our Results (10 participants) as of

11:22 last evening

RT (ms) S Pres Abs Avg 1 535 700 620 3 715 745 730 5 820 795 810 (^5001 2) Set size 3 4 5

600

700

800

RT

Positive Negative Average

All SU Results (55 Ss since Fall ’03)

RT (ms) S Pres Abs Avg 1 615 720 665 3 785 790 790 5 890 900 890 1 2 3 4 5 Set size

500

600

700

800

900

RT (ms)

Positive Negative

Slope about 50 ± 15 ms/item in our version of exp.

Three questions

  • Empirical issues: ???
  • Methodological issues: ???
  • Theoretical issues: ???

Overview of today’s material

  • Approaches to Working Memory
  • Baddeley and Hitch’s Working Memory.
  • Data pertaining to the Baddeley and Hitch framework.
  • Focus switching and working memory

Different meanings of “working

memory”

  • “Working memory capacity” studies.
  • “Focus of attention” theory
  • Baddeley’s working memory.

Differences between STS and

“working memory”

  • WM emphasizes ability to manipulate information (control processes?)
  • WM emphasizes separable storage areas for different modalities (avl storage?)
  • WM studies (generally) do not describe tasks to the degree of detail Atkinson and Shiffrin (and Raaijmakkers and Shiffrin) did.

Capacity studies of WM

  • Construct a measure that is referred to as working memory capacity.
  • E.g. “Reading span” (Daneman and Carpenter,
    1. or “Operation Span” (Turner and Engle,
  • Determine if span correlates with other things.

Where have we seen the term “span”

before?

WM span measures correlate with a

lot of stuff

  • Reading comprehension, language comprehension, spelling... -... vocabulary learning, writing and reasoning
  • Perhaps this “working memory” is a basic property of human intelligence.

Operation Span task (Turner and

Engle, 1989)

  • What do you do?
  • What do you measure?

What factors could affect performance

in operation span?

Baddeley’s Approach

  • Short-term memory is something interesting that should be studied.
  • The Atkinson and Shiffrin model was taking heat (and had equations)
  • Free recall is a poor test of short-term memory.
  • Let’s use immediate serial recall as a test.