Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Arguments for and against Protectionism in International Trade, Apuntes de Comercio Exterior

The reasons for and against protectionism in international trade. Protectionism refers to government policies aimed at restricting free trade to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. Various arguments for protectionism, including the protection of domestic jobs, national security, and the maintenance of health, safety, and environmental standards. It also presents arguments against protectionism, such as the misallocation of resources, the potential for trade wars, and increased costs of production. The document concludes by discussing the potential consequences of protectionist policies, including downward multiplier effects and retaliation.

Tipo: Apuntes

2019/2020

Subido el 28/11/2020

carmen-zuazua
carmen-zuazua 🇪🇸

6 documentos

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Now that you understand there are many good reasons for the world to have free trade you need to know that there are
also arguments for restricting free trade, referred to as ”protectionism” because it is an attempt to protect domestic
industries from foreign (often cheaper - for whatever reason such as enjoying a better technology, being more efficient,
having low wage workers or exchange rate differences) competition.
What ways countries try to restrict free trade will come later.
Arguments for protectionism
the protection of domestic jobs
national security
protection of infant industries
the maintenance of health, safety and environmental standards
anti-dumping and unfair competition
a means of overcoming a balance of payments deficit and
a source of government revenue.
Governments use the following arguments to justify protectionism:
To safeguard domestic employment - protectionist policies reduce the level of imports and increase
national production, (ie, national output) and therefore domestic employment.
To protect strategic industries - a particular product or industry might be of strategic importance to a
country, e.g. agriculture or coal or defense, and protectionism may be justified on the grounds that it is keeping
alive an industry which plays a vital part in the security of the economy.
To safeguard infant industries - The new and competitive industries (followers) need some protection from
the power of already established competitors (leaders) to be able to grow and achieve economies of scale. So
protection for infant industries could be temporarily justified.
To prevent dumping - which is where exporting economies sell goods in overseas markets at a price below
their domestic price (or even below the price cost of production!). Consumers from the importing country pay
more than consumers from the exporting country. Such low prices are part of a policy to destroy rivals in the
importing country (and to increase prices later on!).
To correct balance of payments disequilibrium - as imports are discouraged, and exports encouraged, the
balance of payments improves.
Source of government revenue - where protectionism takes the form of a tariff, this will also raise revenue
for the government, like any other tax.
To prevent labour exploitation in developing economies - preventing import of goods produced by
exploiting cheap labour in developing countries will prevent this labour exploitation (competitiveness in the
exporting country comes from not addressing basic international labour rights set by the International Labour
Organization ILO; www.ilo.org). However, for some of the poorest economies in the world it might also reduce
export income and job opportunities.
To enable a developing country to diversify - Many developing countries are heavily dependent on exports
of primary commodities. This can leave them very exposed to changes in international commodity prices. If
they want to diversify and develop new export revenue streams, they may need to protect these new industries
from full exposure to international competition for a while. (This is an argument for the LDC to protect
themselves from international competition)
pf2

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Arguments for and against Protectionism in International Trade y más Apuntes en PDF de Comercio Exterior solo en Docsity!

Now that you understand there are many good reasons for the world to have free trade you need to know that there are also arguments for restricting free trade, referred to as ” protectionism” because it is an attempt to protect domestic industries from foreign (often cheaper - for whatever reason such as enjoying a better technology, being more efficient, having low wage workers or exchange rate differences) competition. What ways countries try to restrict free trade will come later. Arguments for protectionism the protection of domestic jobs national security protection of infant industries the maintenance of health, safety and environmental standards anti-dumping and unfair competition a means of overcoming a balance of payments deficit and a source of government revenue. Governments use the following arguments to justify protectionism:  To safeguard domestic employment - protectionist policies reduce the level of imports and increase national production, (ie, national output) and therefore domestic employment.  To protect strategic industries - a particular product or industry might be of strategic importance to a country, e.g. agriculture or coal or defense, and protectionism may be justified on the grounds that it is keeping alive an industry which plays a vital part in the security of the economy.  To safeguard infant industries - The new and competitive industries (followers) need some protection from the power of already established competitors (leaders) to be able to grow and achieve economies of scale. So protection for infant industries could be temporarily justified.  To prevent dumping - which is where exporting economies sell goods in overseas markets at a price below their domestic price (or even below the price cost of production!). Consumers from the importing country pay more than consumers from the exporting country. Such low prices are part of a policy to destroy rivals in the importing country (and to increase prices later on!).  To correct balance of payments disequilibrium - as imports are discouraged, and exports encouraged, the balance of payments improves.  Source of government revenue - where protectionism takes the form of a tariff, this will also raise revenue for the government, like any other tax.  To prevent labour exploitation in developing economies - preventing import of goods produced by exploiting cheap labour in developing countries will prevent this labour exploitation (competitiveness in the exporting country comes from not addressing basic international labour rights set by the International Labour Organization ILO; www.ilo.org). However, for some of the poorest economies in the world it might also reduce export income and job opportunities.  To enable a developing country to diversify - Many developing countries are heavily dependent on exports of primary commodities. This can leave them very exposed to changes in international commodity prices. If they want to diversify and develop new export revenue streams, they may need to protect these new industries from full exposure to international competition for a while. ( This is an argument for the LDC to protect themselves from international competition )

Arguments against protectionism a misallocation of resources, the danger of retaliation and “trade wars”, the potential for corruption, increased costs of production due to lack of competition, higher prices for domestic consumers, increased costs of imported factors of production and reduced export competitiveness. Various arguments are used against protectionism. These include:  Loss of allocative efficiency (welfare loss) in the short run - a tariff leads to a reduction in imports and increases the price. There is a loss of consumer surplus. Some of the welfare loss is transferred to the government (tariff revenue), and some to producers (increase in producers surplus). But overall, for the country as a whole there is a welfare loss, a welfare cost to society (loss to consumers that is not transferred to anybody else) represented by the deadweight loss.  Inefficiency of resource allocation in the long run - the imposition of tariffs, or other protectionist measures, in the long run for the country using protections measures results in losses of allocative efficiency Protected producers are not exposed to international competition, do not have enough incentive to decrease costs or innovate and, in the long run, become less competitive and fall behind the rest of the world (producers effect). In addition, tariffs increase prices in the domestic market and distort the price signals directing investments towards inefficient industries (consumers effect).  Downward multiplier effects - if a country protects against imports, this will reduce the exports of other countries and therefore their national output (especially if they are export oriented countries). Consequently, they will also import less as the level of imports is a function of national income level. This process could continue and result in a decrease in world production and income.  Retaliation - protectionist measures tend to be met with some form of retaliation. This will mean that any success in protecting against imports is likely to result in a fall in exports as countries will react accordingly to the protectionist measures.  Bureaucracy - many protectionist measures are bureaucratic to enforce and result in extra cost to society.  Adjustment costs - changes in comparative advantage may require adjustments in the structure of industry, which may take some time and cause temporary increases in unemployment.  Environmental costs - free trade may encourage firms to relocate to countries where environmental regulations (and other regulations such as labour regulations) are more relaxed and compliance costs are lower. Although this may increase producers' profits, it may lead to long-term environmental problems.