Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Fractura lumbar componentes, Esquemas y mapas conceptuales de Patología

En el esquema encontrarás definiciones, clasificaciones,Fisiopatologia, etiología ,signos, síntomas , diagnóstico y tratamiento de las fracturas en la columna lumbar

Tipo: Esquemas y mapas conceptuales

2024/2025

Subido el 15/10/2025

banelly-ocampo
banelly-ocampo 🇨🇴

2 documentos

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Location of impact; T11 to L2 being the
most susceptible to injury, due to the
transition from a rigid to a mobile zone
(7)
REASONS FOR THE MEDICAL
CARE RECEIVED
Pre viously, re st is indic ate d to the pa tie nt, in orde r t o perform t he relevant ex ami nations (X- ray and CT) an d
fac ilitate the ir evaluati on and diagnos is. On the oth er hand, rest hel ps to avoid co mplications in the medica l
int erventio n t o be perfor med (due to in fla mmation, pa in and instabi lit y of the bo ne structure, in this case t he L2
ver tebra). (3)
The surgica l i ntervention , w hich consis ted of a fixat ion and distra cti on of the f rac ture, was p erf ormed due t o t he
hig h collap se of the L2 v ert ebral body, th erefore, th is method allo ws the stabili zat ion of the aff ected verte bra ,
gre atly red uce s postopera tiv e complicat ion s, doesn`t gen erate a lon g h ospital sta y a nd provides a good degree of
cli nical im pro vement (4). In addition, it generates a go od treatmen t o f the inten se pain and av oid s neurologi cal
seq uels (2) . A lso, it is one of the mos t c ommon and u sed in cases o f t raumatic ve rte bral injuri es (4).
Following the tensegrity model, the fracture of the L2 vertebra
triggered a severe biomechanical imbalance, this affecting the
distribution of forces over the body and generating compensatory
adaptations in muscles, fascia and other structures in the whole body.
This caused alterations in the muscular tone and postural changes that
could lead to other problems. The surgery, done with nails, was to
realign the spine and restore stability and prevent complications.(9)(10)
TENSEGRITY
MODEL
RISK FACTORS
Age is important for the
prevalence of spinal injuries. Over
the age of 40 years, aging implies
loss of trabecular and cortical
bone, some changes generate
thinning of the trabeculae and
decrease in cortical thickness,
which makes it more susceptible to
injury (9).
Sport performed; Paragliding involves a
high risk of injury. 27.4 % suffer from a
spinal injury and 68 % of them were
injured on landing. (8)
The main risk factor for vertebral
fractures is high-impact trauma. falls
from great heights account for 38.8%
of vertebral fractures (7)
LUMBAR FRACTURE
Classification
Physiopathology
These are lesions in the lumbar vertebra that affect the
mechanical and neurological stability of the spine. They may be
caused by trauma or bone fragility (osteoporosis).(1)
Type A (compression)
Type B (distraction)
Type C (translocation).
Type A lesions may
affect a single vertebral
body, or may occur in
combination with type B
or C lesions.(2)
It is the combination of
axial compression and
flexion of the spine with
involvement of the anterior
and middle columns. The risk
of neurological damage
increases if the posterior
cortical wall of the vertebral
body is affected.
General Description
SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS(2)
SEVERE DORSAL
OR LUMBAR
PAIN.
SYMPTOMS DUE TO
NERVE
INVOLVEMENT.
INABILITY TO
PERFORM NORMAL
ACTIVITY.
SEVERE CASES,
NEUROLOGICAL
DAMAGE.
DIAGNOSTIC(2)
TREATMENT
X-RAYS: FIRST
CHOICE OF STUDY.
CT OR MRI: BETTER
EVALUATE BONE,
TISSUES, EDEMA AND
VERTEBRAL CANAL.
BONE DENSITOMETRY
AND BLOOD TESTS: IF
OSTEOPOROSIS IS
SUSPECTED.
Etiology
Traffic accidents (39.5%)
🚗
Falls (38.8%)
🏠
sports accidents.
violence or other traumas.
Non-traumatic causes (more common
in older adults):
Osteoporosis
🦴
Disc degeneration
Tumors and metastases
Infections
Metabolic or rheumatologic
diseases.
Chronic corticosteroid therapy.(1)
TREATMENT MAY BE CONSERVATIVE
(MEDICATION, ORTHOSIS AND REST). IF
PAIN PERSISTS, VERTEBRAL
CEMENTATION IS USED. IF THIS IS NOT
SUFFICIENT, OSTEOSYNTHESIS WITH RODS
AND SCREWS IS USED.
pf2

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Fractura lumbar componentes y más Esquemas y mapas conceptuales en PDF de Patología solo en Docsity!

Location of impact; T11 to L2 being the most susceptible to injury, due to the transition from a rigid to a mobile zone (7)

REASONS FOR THE MEDICAL

CARE RECEIVED

Previously, rest is indicated to the patient, in order to perform the relevant examinations (X-ray and CT) and facilitate their evaluation and diagnosis. On the other hand, rest helps to avoid complications in the medical intervention to be performed (due to inflammation, pain and instability of the bone structure, in this case the L vertebra). (3) The surgical intervention, which consisted of a fixation and distraction of the fracture, was performed due to the high collapse of the L2 vertebral body, therefore, this method allows the stabilization of the affected vertebra, greatly reduces postoperative complications, doesn`t generate a long hospital stay and provides a good degree of clinical improvement (4). In addition, it generates a good treatment of the intense pain and avoids neurological sequels (2). Also, it is one of the most common and used in cases of traumatic vertebral injuries (4). Following the tensegrity model, the fracture of the L2 vertebra triggered a severe biomechanical imbalance, this affecting the distribution of forces over the body and generating compensatory adaptations in muscles, fascia and other structures in the whole body. This caused alterations in the muscular tone and postural changes that could lead to other problems. The surgery, done with nails, was to realign the spine and restore stability and prevent complications.(9)(10) TENSEGRITY MODEL

Age is important for the RISK FACTORS

prevalence of spinal injuries. Over the age of 40 years, aging implies loss of trabecular and cortical bone, some changes generate thinning of the trabeculae and decrease in cortical thickness, which makes it more susceptible to injury (9). Sport performed; Paragliding involves a high risk of injury. 27.4 % suffer from a spinal injury and 68 % of them were injured on landing. (8) The main risk factor for vertebral fractures is high-impact trauma. falls from great heights account for 38.8% of vertebral fractures (7) LUMBAR FRACTURE

Classification

Physiopathology

These are lesions in the lumbar vertebra that affect the

mechanical and neurological stability of the spine. They may be caused by trauma or bone fragility (osteoporosis).(1)

Type A (compression) Type B (distraction) Type C (translocation). Type A lesions may affect a single vertebral body, or may occur in combination with type B or C lesions.(2) It is the combination of axial compression and flexion of the spine with involvement of the anterior and middle columns. The risk of neurological damage increases if the posterior cortical wall of the vertebral body is affected.

General Description

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS(2)

SEVERE DORSAL

OR LUMBAR PAIN. SYMPTOMS DUE TO NERVE INVOLVEMENT. INABILITY TO PERFORM NORMAL ACTIVITY. SEVERE CASES, NEUROLOGICAL DAMAGE.

DIAGNOSTIC(2) TREATMENT

X-RAYS: FIRST

CHOICE OF STUDY. CT OR MRI: BETTER EVALUATE BONE, TISSUES, EDEMA AND VERTEBRAL CANAL. BONE DENSITOMETRY AND BLOOD TESTS: IF OSTEOPOROSIS IS SUSPECTED.

Etiology

Traffic accidents (39.5%) 🚗 Falls (38.8%) 🏠 sports accidents. violence or other traumas. Non-traumatic causes (more common in older adults): Osteoporosis 🦴 Disc degeneration Tumors and metastases Infections Metabolic or rheumatologic diseases. Chronic corticosteroid therapy.(1)

TREATMENT MAY BE CONSERVATIVE

(MEDICATION, ORTHOSIS AND REST). IF PAIN PERSISTS, VERTEBRAL CEMENTATION IS USED. IF THIS IS NOT SUFFICIENT, OSTEOSYNTHESIS WITH RODS AND SCREWS IS USED.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC

REFERENCES

Vera S, Ancavil C, Gómez M, Vega R. Spine fractures: review of current classifications, symptoms, and management [Internet]. Revistachilenadeneurocirugia.com. [citado el 9 de marzo de 2025]. Disponible en: https://revistachilenadeneurocirugia.com/index.php/revchilneurocirugia/arti cle/download/397/246/

Brance ML, Cóccaro N, Pastor M, Larroudé M. Fracturas vertebrales: evaluación, diagnóstico y tratamiento: Revisión del tema. Rev. argent. reumatolg. [Internet]. 2020 Sep [citado 2025 Mar 09] ; 31( 3): 57-67. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php? script=sci_arttext&pid=S2362-36752020000300008&lng=es.

Campagne D. Fracturas vertebrales por compresión [Internet]. Manual MSD versión para público general. Manuales MSD; 2022 [cited 2025 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.msdmanuals.com/es/hogar/traumatismos-y- envenenamientos/fracturas/fracturas-vertebrales-por-compresi%C3%B3n? ruleredirectid=752#Tratamiento_v830172_es

Re EO, De León Ar MP, Delgado-Brito, Cortés-González, Ri GA, De La Garza- Castro, et al. www.medigraphic.org.mx Artículo de revisión Fijación vertebral por vía transpedicular. Importancia de los estudios anatómicos y de imagen. Acta Ortopédica Mexicana [Internet]. 2012;26(6):402–11. Available from: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/ortope/or-2012/or126l.pdf

Vaquero G, Moya J, Pérez Á, Coordinador M, Fuentes A, Fremap S, et al. CAPÍTULO 67 -CLASIFICACIÓN FRACTURAS COLUMNA VERTEBRAL TORACO LUMBARES. PAUTA TERAPEÚTICA [Internet]. Available from: https://unitia.secot.es/web/manual_residente/CAPITULO%2067.pdf

Fracturas vertebrales: Síntomas, diagnóstico y tratamiento. CUN [Internet]. www.cun.es. Available from: https://www.cun.es/enfermedades- tratamientos/enfermedades/fracturas-vertebrales

clínica y manejo actuales Spine fractures: review of current classifications, symptoms, and management Sergio Vera, PhD (c)1,2, Camila Ancavil3 , Mariana Gómez3 , Roberto Vega1,2* 1 Instituto de Neurocirugía Asenjo. En: Fracturas vertebrales: revisión a las clasificaciones. Santiago, Chile. 2 Facultad de Medicina; Santiago, Chile; Santiago, Chile;

Crivellaro J, Almeida RMVR de, Wenke R, Neves EB. PERFIL DE LESÕES EM PILOTOS DE PARAPENTE NO BRASIL E SEUS FATORES DE RISCO. Rev Brasil Med Esporte [Internet]. 2017;23(4):270–3. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1517-

Referencia: (9) Olmos Martínez JM, Martínez García J, González Macías J. Envejecimiento músculo-esquelético. Rev Esp Enferm Metab Óseas [Internet]. 2007;16(1):1–7. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1132- 8460(07)73495-

Hutson M, Ward A, editors. Oxford textbook of musculoskeletal medicine. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016. p. 155-162.

Arregui R, Martínez-Quiñones JV, Aso-Escario J, Aso-Vizán J. Papel del refuerzo vertebral mediante cifoplastia en el tratamiento de las fracturas dorsolumbares de índole no osteoporótico. Revisión del tema y análisis de 40 casos. Neurocirugia [Internet]. 2008 [citado el 8 de marzo de 2025];19:537–

  1. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/neuro/v19n6/5.pdf

4A Patología músculoesquelético Londoño Daniela ,forero Juan Manuel , Garcia Juan José ,Ocampo Banelly Trujillo Andrés, Vallejo Susana.