Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


General sociology, Apuntes de Administración de Empresas

Asignatura: Administracion de la empresa, Profesor: , Carrera: Administració i Direcció d'Empreses - Anglès, Universidad: UAB

Tipo: Apuntes

2016/2017

Subido el 26/04/2017

sara_sierra_lopez
sara_sierra_lopez 🇪🇸

4.1

(18)

9 documentos

1 / 50

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
GENERAL SOCIOLOGY
Sociology: “Scientific study of human social life, groups, and societies” Anthony Giddens.
Sociologist: “Someone concerns with understanding society in a discipline and scientific way”.
SOCIAL IMAGINATION
Break free of our personal circumstances, let go of our common-sense assumption.
See and make sense of personal lives and social dynamics in wider context.
Even the most mundane of thing.
Ex. Even a cup of coffee can give us some information about a society or person.
Everyday people is drinking coffee, something that may be a drug for the organism, if
only a few people in the society drunk coffee, this would be a drug.
GOAL = THEORY
Not just WHAT is happening but WHY it’s happening.
Dynamics that explain context A might be useful for explaining context B
Ex. Study of Erasmus student at the UAB finds that time in Barcelona corresponds with
a sharp increase in drug consumption, sexual promiscuousness, and adoption of
alternative lifestyle.
Theoretical implications:
Youth and absence of family, social controls
Influence of new ideas, experience/ friendship networks on lifestyle decision
Might help us to understand what happens to youth when the leave their religious
communities*
METHODS
Not all explanations are good explanations
Rules about how to establish cause and effect, and generalize help us determines what
theoretical we can draw and applicability to other situation
EMPIRICAL VS. NORMATIVE THEORIES
How society is (Empirical): how and why? scientific
Domain of sociologists, anthropologist, economists, political scientist
How society out to be (normative)
Moral, philosophy
Ex. Normative: should Donald Trump be the president?
should the country be governed by rich or by common people?
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c
pf2d
pf2e
pf2f
pf30
pf31
pf32

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga General sociology y más Apuntes en PDF de Administración de Empresas solo en Docsity!

GENERAL SOCIOLOGY

Sociology : “Scientific study of human social life, groups, and societies” Anthony Giddens. Sociologist : “Someone concerns with understanding society in a discipline and scientific way”.

SOCIAL IMAGINATION

  • Break free of our personal circumstances, let go of our common-sense assumption.
  • See and make sense of personal lives and social dynamics in wider context.
  • Even the most mundane of thing. Ex. Even a cup of coffee can give us some information about a society or person. Everyday people is drinking coffee, something that may be a drug for the organism, if only a few people in the society drunk coffee, this would be a drug. GOAL = THEORY
  • Not just WHAT is happening but WHY it’s happening.
  • Dynamics that explain context A might be useful for explaining context B Ex. Study of Erasmus student at the UAB finds that time in Barcelona corresponds with a sharp increase in drug consumption, sexual promiscuousness, and adoption of alternative lifestyle.
  • Theoretical implications: ▲ Youth and absence of family, social controls ▲ Influence of new ideas, experience/ friendship networks on lifestyle decision
  • Might help us to understand what happens to youth when the leave their religious communities* METHODS
  • Not all explanations are good explanations
  • Rules about how to establish cause and effect, and generalize help us determines what theoretical we can draw and applicability to other situation EMPIRICAL VS. NORMATIVE THEORIES
  • How society is (Empirical): how and why? scientific ▲ Domain of sociologists, anthropologist, economists, political scientist
  • How society out to be (normative) ▲ Moral, philosophy Ex. Normative: should Donald Trump be the president? should the country be governed by rich or by common people?

Empirical: What is the best way to distribute the money? .... SOCIOLOGICAL IMAGINATION

  • Allows us to grasp connections between history and biography
  • Personal troubles of milieu vs. public issues of social structure ▲ Trouble lie with individual - Private matter VS. ANTHROPOLOGY (interesting in understand others no themselves)
  • Anthropology historically the study of the “Other” (non-western societies)
  • Sociology historically the study of Western societies
  • Today, there are sociologist who study non-Western societies and anthropologists who study western society
  • (^) Differences more methodological and theoretical VS ECONOMY
  • Economics ▲ Really focus in production, consumption, distribution of goods and services ▲ Historically based on idea of human as rational actor ▲ (^) Emphasis on creation of models to predict market behaviour
  • Sociology ▲ Focus on a larger range of issues ▲ Rationality just one influence on social practice ▲ Greater diversity of methods HOW TO STUDY SOCIETY
  • Watch how people act, relate to one another
  • Participate in the activities of the groups studying
  • Talk to people
  • Give people surveys to fill out
  • (^) Look for documentation of activities, transactions, resources.
  • Follows… ETHNOGRAPHY Is the typical method to studying a group being one of them with documentation, participating in the activities of the group. INTERVIEWS Is another method, is asking to people about the thing you are studying for, talk with them about they experience.

EMILE DURKHEIM

Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) helped to found the discipline of sociology and showed that sociology was different from philosophy and history BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH

  • He born in a small town in Eastern France, and was a son of a rabbi.
  • He studied philosophy and to become a rabbi, and it was interested in studying society from a scientific perspective.
  • Rejected Judaism
  • In 1879 entered the Ecole Normale Superiure in Paris, in his 3rd^ year he disencharted with the high-minded. So he decided to pursue sociology.
  • He wanted to examine the rational
  • He was concerned about the abuse of power by political and military leader
  • Once he graduated from the Ecole Normale began to teach in small town
  • 1887 married with Louse Dreyfus, and began professor career in the university
  • He had 2 children Marie and Andre
  • 1893 The division of labour in society
  • 1895 The rules of sociological Method
  • 1897 Suicide
  • 1898Founded the journal “L’anne sociologique”
  • No social science departments, difficulty finding job
  • Eventually gets dream job a Sorbonne in Paris, plays key role in development social science
  • He was liked by a lot of people but there were others who didn’t like him that much because he said that any social thing (even religion) could be studied sociologically.
  • Some analysis identity him as political conservant but Rubert Bellar points out that doing that is wrong because he says that Durkheim has “lifelong preoccupation with orderly continuous social change toward greater social justice”
  • He was viewed as a radical modernist and liberal
  • He infuriated religious conservative INTELLECTUAL INFLUENCES 2 main themes in Durkheim work:
  • The nature of society ▲ Society: supraindividual force existing independently of the actors who compose it. ▲ Task of sociology: analyse social facts that determine one’s course of action ▲ (^) Durkheim said that social facts can be ascertained by using collective data like suicide and divorce rate. Through systematic collection of data, the patterns behind and within individual behaviour can be uncovered ▲ Durkheim was on the cutting edge of the birth of sociology it owes much to the work of Auguste Comte (coined in the term of sociology 1839. Contended that social world could be studied in as rational and scientific) So Durkheim methology was a continuation of Comte
  • Social solidarity (cohesion of social groups) He said that without some semblance of solidarity and moral cohesion, society would not exist. But he was concerned with modern societies where people often don’t know their neighbours He relied on Comte and Spencer (British sociologist) in that societies are just like a system of interrelated parts that work together to form a unitary, stable whole, analogous to how the parts of human body function independently to sustain its general well being. However he did not agree a 100% with Comte and Spencer. Because he wasn’t friendly with the idea that all societies progress through a series of identifiable evolutionary stages. He dismissed Comte’s “Law of three stages” And with Spencer he was most influenced by Spencer theory on the evolution of societies. Spencer said that small scale communities become complex and diverse as the population grows just as biological organisms. Individuals living in simple societies depend on one and another but as population grows society specializes But Spencer saw society as composed of atomistic individuals each pursuing lines of self- interest conduct. And Durkheim emphasized that society is not a result or aftereffect of individual conduct rather it list prior to and thus shopes individual action
  • · Lack of social regulation o Normlessness (maybe is a famous or a very rich people…)
  • · Rapid social change o Acquisition or loss of $$$ o Breakdown of family o Migration o Transformation that unsettled existing order and the bases of social cohesion.
  • · Loss of personal “compass” o No direction in life o Overwhelmed by choices must make o Willing to submit to norms, try hard to do so, but not clear which norms should guide one’s life. There is an incredible change in the life of this people and they are not “acostumbrado” to the new lifestyle. A change in the social order, everyone have its social order that everybody take from the education, “costumbres”…, so they are not clear of what they should do. SOCIETY IS ORGANIC ENTITY:
  • We can think that society is like a body
  • Different social elements work together to produce fully functioning society
  • Everything has a social function
  • Example: inequality.
  • Healt societies and unhealthy societies
  • Sometimes societies can become dysfunctional ( too much inequlaity)
  • Sociology = medicie fo society Ex. there are people that are working in something that they shouldn’t due to their studies and they efforts.

THE DIVISION OF LABOUR IN SOCIETY

The division of labour means specialization, rather than eveybody do the same, there a people focusing in something and other in other things. SOLIDARITY Solidarity is something important for society. there are two main solidarities

  • Mechanical
  • Organic Simple societies:

o Rudimentary division of labour o Everyone does a bit of everything o Tightly-knit communities o Mechanical solidarity § Based on likenesses § Social solidarity comes from shared beliefs and values § Shared beliefs and values Complex societies (more specialize division of labour) o More developed division of labour due to specialization o More individualism o Less similarity in beliefs, values o Mechanical solidarity replaced by “organic solidarity”, shares beliefs are less important § Based on interdependence, each people is depending on others, because maybe one person that is not focus in something goes to another that it is focused and this one will help him. § Complementary difference RELIGION: Elementary forms of religious life: · Source = anthropological studies of religious life in indigenous communities · How is religion practiced experienced? · (…)

Mistake notions of Religion: · Supernatural Ø Mysterious, unknown, incorehensible · Divinity Ø Belief in god(s) · Problem Ø Supernatural/ divinity not central to all religion Ø Importance has varied over time

Essence of religion: · Form of collective conscience Ø Supports order and solidarity

  • Outgrowth, reflection of social relations (religion has a function to romain those social relations strong)
  • key role in fostering order necessary for social life
  • Religious changes come from shifting social relations
  • Religion has function of reinforcing group cohesion
  • Nationalism= (.... Further Questions
  • Is solidarity necessary in today’s world? It is necessary to feel as a part of something of the society, but in the real life a lot people do what is best for him.

KARL MARX

He was a German philosopher Democratic movement, rights of individuals, free speech

  • Wants French-style revolution in Germany
  • Unsuccessful attempt in 1848 Becomes a fugitive
  • Travels across Europe
  • Spends much time in England

He was in the beginnings of the industrial revolution, and saw an incredible poor people working on the factories, children working a lot of hours…. He wrote “Das Kapital” WHEEN’S INDEDX ON MARX ADAM SMITH (1723-1790) Karl Marx was in very contact with Adam Smith (the father of the economics) Adam Smith, was very agree with the capitalism, he thought that if there were an increase of the exchange markets the would be an increase of division of labour, then will be more productivity, that means more opulence and wealthy for all, that lead to an increase of the consumption. ASSUMPTION

  • Producers own, control products they produce – can exchange for excess surplus produced by others
  • Society made up of materially self-interested individuals who enter into voluntary relation with one another
  • Fair and deliberate exchange
  • Future evolves linearly out of the present

OWNERSHIP OF SURPLUS

  • Surplus produced by one group and appropriated by another group. Looking at the global level, some countries produce a lot of goods (south) and other countries appropriate this goods and take profits

EX: Textile factory, the owner take the profits of the cloths and everything that is make in the factory. Not to the people who is working in the factory with the machines and actually producing the textile. HUMAN NATURE AND MOTIVATIONS

  • (^) Society not just individuals ▲ Organization, institutions, groups
  • Material interest not only motivator of action ▲ Coercion ▲ Manipulation ▲ (^) Obligation

CONFLICT

  • (^) Higher wages mean lower profits, there is a conflict between the workers and the owners
  • Workers and capitalist have opposing interests
  • Greater accumulation of wealth does not necessarily make everyone better off if wealth concentrated in hands of one class Marx said that the conflict between the workers and the owners would end if all the workers get together and said that they don’t want that all the power stay concentrate in one small group. MARX’S BEEF WITH CAPITALISM
  • Alienation ▲ Working essential tour identities ▲ (^) If alienated from products we make we become alienated from ourselves
  • Inequality, exploitation ▲ Capitalists and other exploiting classes benefit from poverty ▲ Without poverty, nobody would accept working for cheap wages, under poor conditions ▲ (^) Profits would decline EXPLOITION VS. OPPRESSION
  • Exploitation ▲ Exploiter need exploited because dependent on efforts ▲ Exploited have measure of power
  • (^) Oppression (non-exploitative) ▲ No dependence ▲ Powerless IDEOLOGY: Ideology for Marx
  • Ruling class doesn’t just control means of material production, but also means of mental production (education system, media)
  • What we value ▲ Freedom, autonomy
  • What we want! (advertisement) ▲ Personal property, endless consumption
  • (^) False consciousness

WEBER

BIOGRAPHY (1864 – 1920)

  • Bored by high school and hated his teacher
  • Studied law, history, philosophy and economics at Heidelberg University – exceled at all of them!
  • Law degree and Ph.D.
  • Wrote on many topics ▲ Religion, law, economy, power/authority, bureaucracy, human action
  • Difficult relationship with his father ▲ Mental breakdown when he died in 1897 ▲ Intermittently PROTESTANT ETHINC AND THE SPIRIT OF CAPITALISM IDEAS AND HISTORICAL CHANGE
  • Marx ▲ Ideas reflects underlying material reality ▲ Contradictions in material relation -> social change, ideational change
  • Weber ▲ Ideas play causal role in development of social and economic system ▲ Subjective meaning that actors attach to their actions important ▲ Cultural and religious traditions shape social and economic behaviour MODERN WESTERN BOURGEOIS RATIONAL CAPITALISM (MWBRC)
  • Formally free labor ▲ Organized relationally, efficiency
  • Bookkeeping and calculation ▲ Constant search for more efficient way of doing things
  • Separation of home and business ▲ Can really focus on work ▲ Organize work most efficient
  • Rational legal system ▲ Guarantees certainty ▲ Contracts subject to law (…) PROTESTANTISM AND CAPITALISM
  • Geographic variation

TWO FORMS OF PROTESTANISM

  • (^) Luther ▲ Calling (your destiny, what you really want) - Highest moral obligation = fulfilment worldly duties, you should focus on that. - Don’t retreat from world - (^) Find place in division of labor ▲ Worldly duties no longer subordinated to ascetic ones - Should not lead monastic lifestyle - Fatalism -> accept station in life
  • Calvin ▲ (^) Predestination (you don’t have control of your destiny, because is already written.) - Only some human chosen to be saved from damnation ▲ Good beyond comprehension - Can’t know intentions, choices - (^) Don’t know whether elect or damned PSYCHOLOGICAL ANXIETY
  • What would you do??
  • Lives on earth = indicator of place in afterlife
  • Looks for signs about your fate and fate of others ▲ (^) See what others people purchasing, consuming ▲ Mutual surveillance
  • Act in ways that delivers those signs so you can be confident that saved ▲ Churches increasingly teach people that level of resources that possess on earth reflective of fate in afterlife ▲ (^) Frenzied accumulation of wealth = way of reducing anxiety. SPIRITCAPITALISM
  • 2 dimensions ▲ Devotion to work ▲ Making money for money’s sake
  • (^) Protestant ethic -> conditions necessary for development of capitalism ▲ Disciplined workforce ▲ Accumulation of capital that may be invested to produce more capital
  • Protestant ethic no longer tied to religion but it is still very much a part of us and how lead our lives
  • Has become an “iron cage” CAPITALIS REPRODUCTION The capitalist economy of the present day is an immense cosmos into which the individual is born, and which present itself to him, at least as an individual, as unalterable order of things in which he must life. It forces the individual, in so fast as he involved in the system of the market relationships, to conform to capitalistic rules of action. The manufacturer who in the long run acts counter to these norms, will just inevitably be eliminated from the economic scene as the worker who cannot (…) “Not ideas, but Materia and ideal interests, directly govern men’s conduct. Yet very frequently the “world images” that have been created by “ideas” have, like switchmen, determined the tracks along which action has been pushed by the dynamic of interest.” Max Weber. Essays in Sociology (1958) Both Catholic and Protestant have the same interest that is heaven. Catholics want to get this accumulating a lot of well (Ascetic Humble) Protestant want to get this accumulating work (max wealth work devotion)

Marx say that to understand a person ant to define them we have to know its class, the status and the party.

  • If you get the profits of the companies, and the business you are the owner then you are from a high class, if you work there but you don’t have the profits you are from a worker class (Economic)
  • Status: sometime people make something that is contradictory to its economy goal, but they buy it to take status, for example cars, maybe the family don’t really like luxury cars, but they get one to have more status.
  • (^) Not only political parties, but labor unions

First of all the main character just a teacher in the school, but suddenly the situation, he know that he have cancer, that force him to break out, and do thing that he would never do. Ex. Babies Babies didn’t know about themselves, they just act to have what they want. GENERALIZED OTHER

  • At an early ages children learn to take the role of others -> assume their social position ▲ (^) Happens unconsciously ▲ Key for developing sympathy toward others and interpersonal understanding
  • Game Stage ▲ Children become able to view themselves through the eyes of multiple others involved in group activity
  • (^) After childhood, role taking increasingly abstract ▲ People learn to assumer position of general community ▲ Generalized others: communal norms, sentiments, values

COOLEY’S LOOKING-GLASS SELF

  • (^) Children begin looking in the mirror and experimenting facial expressions around age
  • Begin to understand what expressions signify (happiness, sadness…)
  • Our self-concepts come from how we interpret other’s perceptions of us based on visual and verbal cues. 3 STEPS TO THIS PROCESS
  • (^) Imagine how we appear to others
  • Imagine what others think of us based on our appearance
  • Develop emotion and feelings about ourselves based on our interpretation of others’ impressions/ evaluation of us SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
  • (^) People act on the basis of the meanings things have for them ▲ Not simply responding to stimuli or enacting social position
  • Meanings arise through social interaction ▲ Not intrinsic to objects
  • Meanings handled and modified through interpretive process Erving Goffman was the father of the symbolic interactionism DERMATURGICAL PERSPECTIVE
  • Social life is like theatre
  • Frontage, Frontage would be what we project to others, people have ideas about us. ▲ (^) Performance of role in front of social audience ▲ Open to social judgment
  • Backstage, would be the reality what really are, we put our costume and our make up to show our positive face to people. ▲ Individuals can practice, polish, and discuss aspects of themselves that audience would find unacceptable.
  • Different degrees of frontage/ backstage. There are some social interactions that are more frontage and others that are more backstage. SETTING
  • Moving between frontage and backstage often involves moving in and out of different settings
  • Settings generally static spaces
  • Sometimes follow people ▲ Processions ▲ Parades PERSONAL FRONT Developing dressing some ways acting some ways, in order to have personal front (professors, police, doctors…) Ex. Hipster Hipster’s have a special way to dress and to look (bear, glass, Starbucks, Apple, ponytail…) MILAGRAM EXPERIMENTS One of interesting experiments was Milgram Experiment, this experiment is psychology experiment, it says that some people have to press a button that will make some electroshock to other in other room. The experiment is to know how time the people can press the button while they hear the other person shutting. DRAMATIC REALIZATION
  • Performance of tasks not enough
  • Must give impressions that we are performing well
  • Sometimes time we spend on appearance come at expense of our actual performance ROLE PLAYING
  • (^) Different roles correspond to different dimensions of self
  • Can be cynic, but roles often have power over us
  • More we enact them and get positive reinforcement from others, more we believe our own acts Ex. There are some situation that people assume their role (Kim Jong Un that are surrounded by people under they orders, that really think that he has special powers)