Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Research Design and Hypothesis Testing in Psychology: Understanding the Scientific Process, Apuntes de Administración de Empresas

An overview of the scientific process in psychology research, focusing on the importance of formulating research problems, reviewing literature, specifying hypotheses, and hypothesis testing. It covers various aspects of hypothesis testing, including types of hypotheses, statistical decision-making, and potential errors.

Tipo: Apuntes

2013/2014

Subido el 27/04/2014

roilea
roilea 🇪🇸

1

(1)

3 documentos

1 / 44

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
MARKETING RESEARCH II
Lecture 2 – Formulating the research question(s) | Developing the
hypotheses
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff
pf12
pf13
pf14
pf15
pf16
pf17
pf18
pf19
pf1a
pf1b
pf1c
pf1d
pf1e
pf1f
pf20
pf21
pf22
pf23
pf24
pf25
pf26
pf27
pf28
pf29
pf2a
pf2b
pf2c

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Research Design and Hypothesis Testing in Psychology: Understanding the Scientific Process y más Apuntes en PDF de Administración de Empresas solo en Docsity!

MARKETING RESEARCH II

Lecture 2 – Formulating the research question(s) | Developing the hypotheses

Previous lecture

¤ What is an experiment?

¤ Scientific understanding of human behavior ¤ Manipulate IVs, measure DVs ¤ Control extraneous influences ¤ Causal relationship between IV and DV

Sources of research ideas

¤ Everyday life

¤ e.g., Kitty Genovese murder ¤ 38 witnesses saw the attack; no one helped; only one person called the police ¤ idea that bystander intervention drops the more people are around ¤ “bystander effect” or “Genovese syndrome” ¤ e.g., impulse buying

¤ Practical issues

¤ e.g., effect of alcohol on driving

Sources of research ideas

¤ Past research (i.e., already published

findings). You can think of …

¤ replicating the research ¤ generalizing the research ¤ e.g., bystander effect in all cultures? ¤ finding explanations for a phenomenon ¤ e.g., diffusion of responsibility ¤ finding factors under which a phenomenon does not occur ¤ e.g., low number of bystanders

Formulating the research problem ¤ Statement of a research question

¤ Research problem should be very specific

¤ Designing good experiments to test it will be otherwise impossible!

Formulating the research problem ¤ Very important to define what the question is and what it is not. ¤ E.g., ¤ NOT à “The Spanish economic crisis” OR EVEN “The role of the housing market in the Spanish economic crisis”, ¤ BUT à “ How did deregulation in the housing market cause/contribute to the Spanish economic crisis?

Formulating the research problem: Building a problem tree There is a problem with litter in the streets of Barcelona People just throw their waste in the streets Spanish people don´t care about their environment There is a lack of dustbins Authorities don´t prioritize the litter problem Change in attitude through time Fastfood and coffee -­‐to-­‐go create more litter There is more litter than there used to be Cleanup services are understaffed Unpleasant environment Fewer tourists Could be injurious to health Lack of income to the municipality Higher medical Littered streets lead to more expenses people littering More difficult to change attitude Causes Consequences Is this a crisis issue? Should waste collection be privatized?

Formulating the research problem ¤ Criteria for good research problems :

¤ Variables should express a relation

¤ Stated in question form

¤ Capable of empirical testing

¤ Question should be formulated in a way that

leaves no doubt about how we’re going to

link the question to the evidence we collect.

Specifying hypotheses

¤ After narrowing down the research problem

and reviewing the literature, you can develop

hypotheses

Specifying Hypotheses

¤ A hypothesis represents a prediction of the

relation that exists among variables

¤ i.e., of the effect of an IV on a DV

¤ Must be capable of being refuted or confirmed

¤ Should be as specific as possible and provide a

clear “tendency” between the variables

¤ BAD : Consumers prefer ads with many arguments ¤ BETTER : Compared to consumers low in need for cognition, consumers high in need for cognition prefer ads with many arguments

Types of Hypotheses

¤ Different types of scientific hypotheses

¤ if…then… structure ¤ If people witness an emergency situation as part of a large group, they will be less likely to help than if they witness the same situation as part of a small group ¤ Non-directional vs. directional ¤ Witnessing an emergency situation as part of a large group affects helping behavior ¤ Witnessing an emergency situation as part of a large group has a negative effect on helping behavior

Hypothesis testing

¤ In an experiment, you test the null

hypothesis

¤ To accept the scientific hypothesis, you

must collect evidence to reject the null

hypothesis

¤ as a researcher, you expect that the null hypothesis will be rejected ¤ If null hypothesis rejected à support for the theory

Hypothesis testing

¤ Example

¤ Simple case: determine if two groups are different from each other ¤ cocaine study ¤ two groups of rats pushing a lever ¤ group 1 receives 0.5 mg/kg ¤ group 2 receives 1.0 mg/kg ¤ which group pushes the lever the most?

Hypothesis testing

¤ Example

¤ Null hypothesis ¤ group 1 = group 2 ¤ Scientific hypothesis ¤ group 1 ≠ group 2