




































Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity
Prepara tus exámenes con los documentos que comparten otros estudiantes como tú en Docsity
Encuentra los documentos específicos para los exámenes de tu universidad
Estudia con lecciones y exámenes resueltos basados en los programas académicos de las mejores universidades
Responde a preguntas de exámenes reales y pon a prueba tu preparación
Consigue puntos base para descargar
Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium
Comunidad
Pide ayuda a la comunidad y resuelve tus dudas de estudio
Ebooks gratuitos
Descarga nuestras guías gratuitas sobre técnicas de estudio, métodos para controlar la ansiedad y consejos para la tesis preparadas por los tutores de Docsity
An overview of the scientific process in psychology research, focusing on the importance of formulating research problems, reviewing literature, specifying hypotheses, and hypothesis testing. It covers various aspects of hypothesis testing, including types of hypotheses, statistical decision-making, and potential errors.
Tipo: Apuntes
1 / 44
Esta página no es visible en la vista previa
¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!





































Lecture 2 – Formulating the research question(s) | Developing the hypotheses
¤ Scientific understanding of human behavior ¤ Manipulate IVs, measure DVs ¤ Control extraneous influences ¤ Causal relationship between IV and DV
¤ e.g., Kitty Genovese murder ¤ 38 witnesses saw the attack; no one helped; only one person called the police ¤ idea that bystander intervention drops the more people are around ¤ “bystander effect” or “Genovese syndrome” ¤ e.g., impulse buying
¤ e.g., effect of alcohol on driving
¤ replicating the research ¤ generalizing the research ¤ e.g., bystander effect in all cultures? ¤ finding explanations for a phenomenon ¤ e.g., diffusion of responsibility ¤ finding factors under which a phenomenon does not occur ¤ e.g., low number of bystanders
Formulating the research problem ¤ Statement of a research question
¤ Designing good experiments to test it will be otherwise impossible!
Formulating the research problem ¤ Very important to define what the question is and what it is not. ¤ E.g., ¤ NOT à “The Spanish economic crisis” OR EVEN “The role of the housing market in the Spanish economic crisis”, ¤ BUT à “ How did deregulation in the housing market cause/contribute to the Spanish economic crisis? ”
Formulating the research problem: Building a problem tree There is a problem with litter in the streets of Barcelona People just throw their waste in the streets Spanish people don´t care about their environment There is a lack of dustbins Authorities don´t prioritize the litter problem Change in attitude through time Fastfood and coffee -‐to-‐go create more litter There is more litter than there used to be Cleanup services are understaffed Unpleasant environment Fewer tourists Could be injurious to health Lack of income to the municipality Higher medical Littered streets lead to more expenses people littering More difficult to change attitude Causes Consequences Is this a crisis issue? Should waste collection be privatized?
Formulating the research problem ¤ Criteria for good research problems :
¤ i.e., of the effect of an IV on a DV
¤ BAD : Consumers prefer ads with many arguments ¤ BETTER : Compared to consumers low in need for cognition, consumers high in need for cognition prefer ads with many arguments
¤ if…then… structure ¤ If people witness an emergency situation as part of a large group, they will be less likely to help than if they witness the same situation as part of a small group ¤ Non-directional vs. directional ¤ Witnessing an emergency situation as part of a large group affects helping behavior ¤ Witnessing an emergency situation as part of a large group has a negative effect on helping behavior
¤ as a researcher, you expect that the null hypothesis will be rejected ¤ If null hypothesis rejected à support for the theory
¤ Simple case: determine if two groups are different from each other ¤ cocaine study ¤ two groups of rats pushing a lever ¤ group 1 receives 0.5 mg/kg ¤ group 2 receives 1.0 mg/kg ¤ which group pushes the lever the most?
¤ Null hypothesis ¤ group 1 = group 2 ¤ Scientific hypothesis ¤ group 1 ≠ group 2