Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Napoleón pros y contras, Apuntes de Historia

Trabajo de Napoleón sus pros y sus contras

Tipo: Apuntes

2020/2021

Subido el 28/02/2021

ana-rodado-raigal
ana-rodado-raigal 🇪🇸

1 documento

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
NAPOLEON
Ana Rodado, Laura Pérez Cuenca & Carmen Martinez
8/11/2020
What is your main argument?
Napoleon did not support the revolution because he established a dictatorship since only
he could make the decision
What are your reasons for thinking this?
Napoleon was at one time seen as a firm believer in revolutionary ideas; he supported
Jacobin policies to the point that he was imprisoned for a month for being seen as a
robespierristes.
A tax on salt was introduced, such as gabelle. This went against the ideals of the
revolution as it sought to ease the burden of the poor.
Napoleon didn't make life easier for workers either, they wouldn't be helped to form
unions, which meant that if employers were unfair or had them working in a dangerous
environment then they couldn't speak out against it.
they were forced to wear a livret, which restricted their freedom of movement.
Napoleon also reintroduces the idea that Catholicism was the main religion in France,
but he did it for his own good rather than the people. It suited Napoleon because it
ensured loyalty, since all the priests were under the pay of the state, and they along
with the bishops and archbishops were also chosen by him.
What evidence is there against your argument? What do you think the
pair on the opposite side of the argument are going to say?
The evidence against my argument could be that Napoleon brought stability back to France
with his Reforms, he was the best military Leader in history, and his legacy was cemented by his
family dynasty.
1
pf3
pf4

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Napoleón pros y contras y más Apuntes en PDF de Historia solo en Docsity!

NAPOLEON

Ana Rodado, Laura Pérez Cuenca & Carmen Martinez

What is your main argument?

Napoleon did not support the revolution because he established a dictatorship since only he could make the decision

What are your reasons for thinking this?

● Napoleon was at one time seen as a firm believer in revolutionary ideas; he supported Jacobin policies to the point that he was imprisoned for a month for being seen as a robespierristes. ● A tax on salt was introduced, such as gabelle. This went against the ideals of the revolution as it sought to ease the burden of the poor. ● Napoleon didn't make life easier for workers either, they wouldn't be helped to form unions, which meant that if employers were unfair or had them working in a dangerous environment then they couldn't speak out against it. ● they were forced to wear a livret, which restricted their freedom of movement. ● Napoleon also reintroduces the idea that Catholicism was the main religion in France, but he did it for his own good rather than the people. It suited Napoleon because it ensured loyalty, since all the priests were under the pay of the state, and they along with the bishops and archbishops were also chosen by him.

What evidence is there against your argument? What do you think the
pair on the opposite side of the argument are going to say?

The evidence against my argument could be that Napoleon brought stability back to France with his Reforms, he was the best military Leader in history, and his legacy was cemented by his family dynasty. 1

Can you find reasons why this evidence may be flawed? i.e. What
evidence are they going to use? Is it good evidence or weak? Can it be
interpreted in a different way?

The idea is quite strong since it is of the little that Napoleon did well in the French Revolution but in 1799 the Consulate was formed, which followed the ideas of its constitution, which was seen to follow the basic principles of "property, equality and liberty. ", which were ideas of the revolution. A plebiscite was held to show support for their changes. The plebiscite was also seen as making things fair. Napoleon carried out many reforms that vaguely carried out the work of revolutionary governments; Napoleon took more pride in his Civil Code. This code was considered to encompass revolutionary principles: freedom of conscience and employment, and equality as in the division of states between children and the abolition of feudalism. 2

Can you find reasons why this evidence may be flawed? i.e. What

evidence are they going to use? Is it good evidence or weak? Can it be

interpreted in a different way?

Yes, this evidence is flawed and weak since Of the three key principles of the Revolution, liberty, equality and fraternity, it was liberty that suffered the most under Napoleon. However, many historians point out that France had not established freedom prior to Napoleon's rise to power, so Napoleon had not betrayed the revolution any more than his predecessors.