Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Efecto de gotas mydriáticas en OCTA en degeneración macular relacionada a la edad, Apuntes de Oftalmología

Un estudio que evalúa el efecto de gotas mydriáticas en parámetros de OCTA (Óptica Coherente de Toma Angiográfica) en pacientes con degeneración macular relacionada a la edad. El estudio compara las mediciones de densidad de flujo (FD), zona avascular foveal (FAZ), índice de señal (SSI) y puntuación de artefactos de movimiento (MAS) antes y después de la instalación de tropicamida/fenilefrina en la misma región foveal central de 3x3mm y en las capilares radiales peripapilar (RPC) en todo el campo. No se encontró diferencia significativa en las áreas de la FAZ o en el SSI antes y después de la instalación de las gotas mydriáticas. Sin embargo, se encontró una diferencia significativa en el índice de masa subretinal (MAS) después de la aplicación de gotas mydriáticas (p = 0.003).

Tipo: Apuntes

2019/2020

Subido el 24/05/2020

fiorella-ibanez
fiorella-ibanez 🇨🇴

3 documentos

1 / 14

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Resources How To
Go to:
Journal List PLoS One v.14(10); 2019 PMC6777775
PLoS One. 2019; 14(10): e0223452.
Published online 2019 Oct 4.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223452
PMCID: PMC6777775
PMID: 31584983
Influence of mydriasis on optical coherence
tomography angiography imaging in patients with
age-related macular degeneration
Viktoria C. Brücher, Co nceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology,
Supervision, Visualiz ation, Writing – origina l draft, Writing – review & editing ,
Jens J. Storp, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software,
Writing – original draft, Laura Kerschke, Data curation, Methodolog y, Pieter Nelis,
Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing , Nicole Eter ,
Formal analysis, Proj ect administration, Re sources, Supervision, and
Maged Alnawaiseh, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation , Supervision,
Writing – review & editing
Manuel Alberto de Almeida e Sousa Falcão, Editor
Author information Article notes Copyright and License inform ation Disclaimer
Associated Data
Data Availability Statement
Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effect of topical mydriatic eye drops on optical coherence
tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters in patients with age-related
macular degeneration (AMD).
Methods
27 eyes of 27 patients suffering from AMD were included in this cross-
sectional study. Patients with ≥-4.5 diopters spherical equivalent, corneal
opacities or dense cataract preventing high-quality imaging were excluded.
Whole-en-face scans of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep
capillary plexus (DCP) in the central 3x3mm foveal region as well as whole-
en-face and peripapillary scans of the radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC)
were generated using OCTA (AngioVue®, Optovue). Imaging was first
conducted with patients’ eyes in miosis, then in mydriasis after instillation of
a dilating eye drop (0.5% tropicamide, 2.5% phenylephrine-HCl). Main
outcome measures were flow density (FD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ),
signal strength index (SSI) and motion artifact score (MAS).
Results
Our results reveal that in AMD patients there is no significant difference
Formats:
Article | PubReader | ePub (beta) | PDF
(1.2M) | Citation
Share
Facebook Twitter Google+
Sign in to NCBI
1,*
1 2
1
1
1
Search
Advanced Journal list
US National Library of Medicine
National Institutes of Health
PMC
Help
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Efecto de gotas mydriáticas en OCTA en degeneración macular relacionada a la edad y más Apuntes en PDF de Oftalmología solo en Docsity!

Resources How To Go to: Journal List PLoS One v.14(10); 2019 PMC PLoS One. 2019; 14(10): e0223452. Published online 2019 Oct 4. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. PMCID: PMC PMID: 31584983

Influence of mydriasis on optical coherence

tomography angiography imaging in patients with

age-related macular degeneration

Viktoria C. Brücher, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing , Jens J. Storp, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Laura Kerschke, Data curation, Methodology, Pieter Nelis, Data curation, Methodology, Software, Writing – review & editing , Nicole Eter, Formal analysis, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, and Maged Alnawaiseh, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing Manuel Alberto de Almeida e Sousa Falcão, Editor ▸ Author information ▸ Article notes ▸ Copyright and License information Disclaimer

Associated Data

▸ Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effect of topical mydriatic eye drops on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) parameters in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods 27 eyes of 27 patients suffering from AMD were included in this cross- sectional study. Patients with ≥-4.5 diopters spherical equivalent, corneal opacities or dense cataract preventing high-quality imaging were excluded. Whole-en-face scans of the superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP) in the central 3x3mm foveal region as well as whole- en-face and peripapillary scans of the radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC) were generated using OCTA (AngioVue®, Optovue). Imaging was first conducted with patients’ eyes in miosis, then in mydriasis after instillation of a dilating eye drop ( 0. 5% tropicamide , 2. 5% phenylephrine-HCl ). Main outcome measures were flow density (FD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), signal strength index (SSI) and motion artifact score (MAS). Results Our results reveal that in AMD patients there is no significant difference Formats: Article | PubReader | ePub (beta) | PDF (1.2M) | Citation Share Facebook Twitter Google+ Sign in to NCBI 1,* 1 2 1 1 1 Search US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health Advanced Journal list PMC Help

Go to: Go to: between FD measurements taken in miosis and those taken in mydriasis around the SCP (p = 0.198), DCP (p = 0.458), RPC whole-en-face (p = 0.275) and RPC peripapillary (p = 0.503). Measurements taken in these two states appear to be equivalent for assessment of FD (90%CI within ± 0.05). No significant difference was found either in the area of the FAZ (p = 0.338) or in the SSI (p = 0.371) before and after the instillation of tropicamide/phenylephrine. MAS was significantly lower after the application of mydriatic eye drops (p = 0.003). Conclusions Our findings reveal that neither measurements of FD nor measurements of the FAZ area changed significantly in AMD patients after the application of tropicamide/phenylephrine. Since MAS improved significantly in dilation, mydriatic examination is recommended. Nevertheless, a comparison of OCTA metrics from images taken with different pupil states (miosis versus mydriasis) is valid for clinical trials.

Introduction

A new imaging technology, optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) has recently been gaining attention in scientific research [ 1 , 2 ]. It has been evaluated in different ocular and systemic diseases and is gradually being incorporated into routine ophthalmologic practice. OCTA produces structural images of the blood flow within the retinal and choriocapillaris plexuses by combining the properties of the well-established OCT with a motion contrast feature [ 2 ]. It can visualize retinal and choroidal vessels in different layers of the retina and choroid as well as pathological neovascularization [ 3 , 4 ]. Moreover, OCTA allows quantitative evaluation of retinal and optic nerve head blood flow. The repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative OCTA metrics have been evaluated in depth in various recent studies in patients with healthy eyes and in patients with different ocular diseases [ 5 – 11 ]. Many studies have investigated factors influencing OCTA metrics such as motion artifacts and image quality [ 12 – 16 ], age and gender [ 17 – 22 ], spherical equivalent and axial length [ 13 – 25 ] and systemic diseases [ 26 – 31 ] and thereby indicated how to apply and interpret OCTA most adequately. There is very little literature on the influence of mydriasis on quantitative OCTA parameters such as flow density (FD), foveal avascular zone (FAZ), signal strength index (SSI) or motion artifact score (MAS) for image quality. Cheng et al. [ 32 ] have looked into the effect of topical mydriatic eye drops on OCTA metrics in a young healthy control group (mean age: 30.13 ± 4. years). However, as patients in clinical practice are usually older and have visual impairment, quantitative OCTA metrics might be affected differently. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the impact of the state of the pupil on quantitative OCTA metrics in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. We achieved this aim and present our findings here.

Methods

Patients The data in this study were derived from 27 eyes of 27 patients suffering from early, intermediate and advanced AMD (AREDS Classification) [ 33 , 34 ]. Patients were examined at the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center between 3 November 2017 and 15 December 2017. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee (approved by the ethics committee of the University of Muenster, Germany) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later rd th

Go to: 2. 5% phenylephrine-HCl ). The second imaging session was performed 15 minutes after the administration of one drop of tropicamide/phenylephrine. Additionally, the onset of dilation was checked visually by the expert examiner before continuing with the second imaging session. Furthermore, subjects had to rest for at least 10 minutes before imaging was performed, as recommended by Alnawaiseh et al. [ 35 ]. We selected the image with the fewest motion artifacts, correct segmentation and highest SSI. The motion artifact score, as described by Lauermann et al. [ 12 ] for macular OCTA images, was evaluated before and after the application of mydriatic eye drops by two independent examiners; the mean was taken for analysis. The two independent graders were unmasked for the images. The MAS score identifies five major imaging artifacts (quilting, displacement, vessel doubling, stretch artifacts, blink lines) and the presence/absence or extent of each artifact defined the attribution to OCTA MAS 1 through 4 [ 12 ]. Statistical analysis Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 25, 2017). The primary endpoint of this study was the FD at the SCP and DCP in the central 3x3mm foveal region and the whole-en-face RPC and peripapillary RPC area. The primary aim of the project was to establish whether or not there is a change in FD in the SCP and DCP and in the whole-en-face RPC and peripapillary RPC area with different pupil states (miosis versus mydriasis). In order to control a multiple significance level of 5%, a Bonferroni correction was applied, i.e. each test was carried out at the local level of 5%/4 = 1.25%. All further analyses were exploratory, not confirmatory, and were interpreted accordingly. P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Patient characteristics were described by standard descriptive statistical measures. Continuous variables are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables are reported as absolute frequencies. The distribution of the data was checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. FD and SSI showed normal distribution and were then compared using the paired t-test. FAZ and MAS showed non-normal distribution and were therefore analyzed using the paired Wilcoxon-test. Parameters for which no differences could be detected before and after administration of tropicamide/phenylephrine were investigated further based on the interval inclusion test for equivalence which is equivalent to Schuirmann’s [ 36 ] two one-sided tests approach (TOST). The test was performed on the relative differences between outcome measures using a pre- determined tolerance range of -0.05 to 0.05. To derive the test decision, the two-sided 90% confidence interval for the difference of means was calculated for each outcome measure. Where the respective confidence interval lay within the above-mentioned tolerance range, the two measurement conditions (miosis and mydriasis) were considered equivalent, meaning that the results generated under the two conditions did not differ in any clinically relevant way.

Results

Characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Characteristics of study population. ® ®

study subjects Age (y, mean ± SD) 78.07 ± 12. Gender (M/F) 10/ Visual acuity (LogMAR, mean ± SD) 0.54 ± 0. Spherical equivalent (D, mean ± SD) 0.24 ± 1. IOP (mmHg, mean ± SD) 15.96 ± 3. Early AMD 1 (3.70%) Intermediate AMD 7 (25.93%) Advanced AMD 19 (70.37%)

  • CNV 15 (78.95%)
  • cRORA 4 (21.05%) Systemic medication
  • Sympathomimetic/parasympatholytic drug 0
  • Sympatholytic/parasympathomimetic drug 0
  • Antidiabetic therapy 4
  • Antihypertensive drug 13
  • Tamsulosin 1 Systemic diseases
  • Stroke 2
  • Diabetes mellitus 4 SD (standard deviation), y (years), M (male), F (female), LogMar (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), D (diopter), mmHg (millimeters of mercury), IOP (intraocular pressure), age-related macular degeneration (AMD), choroidal neovascularization (CNV), complete retinal pigment epithelium and outer retinal atrophy (cRORA). Neither SCP (p = 0.198) nor DCP (p = 0.458) and neither RPC whole-en- face (p = 0.275) nor RPC-peripapillary (p = 0.503) appeared to be significantly different in the states of miosis and tropicamide/phenylephrine- induced mydriasis (Table 2). Table 2 Pre- and post-dilation FD results. pre-dilation (±SD) post-dilation (±SD) p- value 3x3mm foveal acquisition SCP, whole-en-face 45.19 ± 4.37 44.56 ± 3.45 0. DCP, whole-en-face 51.36 ± 3.90 51.00 ± 4.10 0. 4.5x4.5mm ONH acquisition RPC, whole-en-face 49.16 ± 4.70 49.66 ± 4.95 0. RPC, peripapillary 56.33 ± 5.62 56.33 ± 5.90 0. Results for pre- and post-dilation flow density (FD) of superficial capillary plexus (SCP) and deep capillary plexus (DCP)(3x3mm foveal acquisition) and

Go to: 90%-CI 3x3mm foveal acquisition SCP, whole-en-face -0.011–0. DCP, whole-en-face -0.013–0. 4.5x4.5mm ONH acquisition RPC, whole-en-face -0.029–0. RPC, peripapillary -0.024–0. Results for the 90%-confidence intervals of the relative differences between measurements in miosis and mydriasis in their respective locations for age- related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. Statistically significant results (i.e. inclusion of the respective CI in the pre-defined tolerance range of ± 5%) indicate equivalence of the two measurement conditions and are marked in bold. Acronyms: confidence interval (CI), superficial capillary plexus (SCP), deep capillary plexus (DCP),radial peripapillary capillaries (RPC), millimeter (mm), optic verve head (ONH). When analyzed using the interval inclusion test for equivalence, both FAZ and SSI exceeded the preset tolerance range of ± 0.05 in the negative half (FAZ: -0.288–0.028; SSI: -0.056–0.012), indicating that FAZ and SSI results were on average higher in mydriasis than in miosis. Therefore, while not being significantly different (p = 0.338; p = 0.371), no equivalence of FAZ and SSI measurements in the two states of the pupils could be shown, either.

Discussion

Over the years OCTA has become the focus of an increasing number of studies, several of which do not mention whether the state of the pupil was considered in their trials, while comparing quantitative OCTA values taken in possibly different pupil states. This has raised the question, whether quantitative OCTA results are different in miosis and mydriasis and whether they are comparable to each other in various pathologies, such as AMD. Thus, we analyzed OCTA imaging before and after application of a mydriatic drug ( 0. 5% tropicamide , 2. 5% phenylephrine-HCl ) and evaluated FD, FAZ, SSI and MAS. Our findings point to an equivalence of FD evaluation in miosis and mydriasis with tropicamide/phenylephrine in AMD patients. The mean MAS improved significantly after the tropicamide/phenylephrine mixture had been instilled. Several clinical trials have investigated the influence of mydriasis on OCT [ 37 – 46 ]. Some authors report a significant difference in OCT-based parameters between pre- and post-dilation [ 39 – 41 , 46 ], whereas most studies describe no significant difference between pre- and post-dilation measurement results [ 37 , 38 , 42 – 45 ]. A study by Cheng et al. [ 32 ] analyzed OCTA images of 16 eyes of 8 healthy patients undergoing pupil dilation using different eye drop mixtures. First pupil dilation was performed using tropicamide eye drops. The following week, study subjects received a phenylephrine/tropicamide mixture. The authors applied three eye drops at 10-minute intervals and imaged 10 minutes after the last eye drop. When tropicamide eye drops were used, there were no significant differences in peripapillary, perifoveal or parafoveal measurements or in FAZ outcomes. Analysis of results with the phenylephrine/tropicamide mixture revealed no significant differences for the

perifoveal and parafoveal layers or for the FAZ. However, peripapillary layers did show a slight but significant reduction in FD after dilation (p = 0.034). The authors concluded that topical phenylephrine reduced the retinal vessel density at peripapillary locations [ 32 ]. We, however, did not observe any significant difference in FD or FAZ pre- and post-dilation using a phenylephrine/tropicamide mixture. One possible explanation for these contradictory findings could be the number of eye drops applied. In the study presented by Cheng et al. (n = 8) the mydriatic eye drops were applied every 10 minutes, for a total of three instillations. We chose to apply mydriatic eye drops only once, then to wait 15 minutes and check for proper dilation, as is done in clinical practice. It is reasonable to assume that multiple instillations of phenylephrine/tropicamide eye drops could affect FD more significantly than just one single instillation. Our studies are corroborated by Polak et al. [ 47 ], who found no relationship between phenylephrine and retinal vessels. Retinal vessel diameter was measured using a Zeiss retinal vessel analyzer (Zeiss FF 450, Jena, Germany). Retinal leucocyte velocity, flow and density were measured with the blue field entoptic technique. The authors found that neither placebo nor phenylephrine influenced retinal hemodynamics. Among the factors influencing FD and FAZ, artifacts as well as image quality have proved to be of critical importance. Several investigations have shown that these artifacts may affect the accuracy of measurements [ 12 – 16 ]. To our knowledge, there is no study-based consensus or recommendation stating which state of the pupil provides the fewest motion artifacts and highest image quality and is therefore most favorable for OCTA imaging. Previous studies have reported various cutoff values for the signal strength index [ 48 – 50 ]. Al-Sheik and co-workers elaborated on the effect of different levels of SSI on a quantitative analysis of OCTA images in healthy eyes. The study group found the frequency of artifacts to be higher and the repeatability of FD measurements to be lower in images of reduced quality [ 51 ]. In our study, no significant difference was found between SSI results pre- and post- dilation. As Lauermann et al. pointed out, “a high SSI level and a high repeatability of FD measurements do not necessarily preclude the presence of motion artifacts, even if active eye-tracking is used” [ 52 ]. Thus, there is pressing need for other quantitative parameters. The motion artifact score described by Lauermann et al. provides information on OCTA image quality with regard to image artifacts. Our results reveal that pre-dilation MAS was significantly higher than post-dilation MAS, translating to fewer and/or less severe motion artifacts in mydriasis. One explanation for this might be that the tracker of the OCTA device fails due to a worse fundus image in miosis. Further studies using different OCTA devices are needed to investigate this issue. Even though the overall FD does not change in this study, it is possible that focal changes are present due to artifacts (Fig 2). This is of special relevance in the many studies where angiograms are examined topographically in AMD [ 53 – 55 ] or for the detection of ischemic areas in diabetic retinopathy [ 56 , 57 ]. Our study has some limitations. Firstly, we analyzed only a small cohort (n = 27), which nevertheless represents the largest cohort in the literature to date. Nevertheless the results cannot be extrapolated to patients with media opacities. Secondly, we analyzed only AMD patients, which prohibits us from applying conclusions drawn from this trial to other patient groups. Thirdly, we merely analyzed the effect of a tropicamide/phenylephrine mixture on OCTA imaging. We cannot therefore make statements about the effects of mydriatic drugs on OCTA imaging in general. Other drugs, such as

[Google Scholar]

  1. Manalastas PIC, Zangwill LM, Saunders LJ, Mansouri K, Belghith A, Suh MH, et al. Reproducibility of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Macular and Optic Nerve Head Vascular Density in Glaucoma and Healthy Eyes. J Glaucoma. 2017; 26 ( 10 ): 851–859. 10.1097/IJG. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lei J, Durbin MK, Shi Y, Uji A, Balasubramanian S, Baghdasaryan E, et al. Repeatability and Reproducibility of Superficial Macular Retinal Vessel Density Measurements Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography En Face Images. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017; 135 ( 10 ): 1092–1098. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3431 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Sheikh M, Tepelus TC, Nazikyan T, Sadda SR. Repeatability of automated vessel density measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101 ( 4 ): 449–452. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-308764 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Yanik Odabaş Ö, Demirel S, Özmert E, Batioğlu F. Repeatability of automated vessel density and superficial and deep foveal avascular zone area measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography: Diurnal Findings. Retina. 2018; 38 ( 6 ): 1238–1245. 10.1097/IAE. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Alnawaiseh M, Schubert F, Heiduschka P, Eter N. Optical coherence tomography angiography in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Retina. 2019; 39 ( 1 ): 210–217. 10.1097/IAE.000000000000190 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lauermann JL, Treder M, Heiduschka P, Clemens CR, Eter N, Alten F. Impact of eye-tracking technology on OCT-angiography imaging quality in age-related macular degeneration. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017; 255 ( 8 ): 1535–1542. 10.1007/s00417-017-3684-z [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghasemi Falavarjani K, Al-Sheikh M, Akil H, Sadda SR. Image artefacts in swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101 ( 5 ): 564–568. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016- [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Spaide RF, Fujimoto JG, Waheed NK. Image Artifacts in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Retina. 2015; 35 ( 11 ): 2163–2180. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000765 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ghasemi Falavarjani K, Al-Sheikh M, Darvizeh F, Sadun AA, Sadda SR. Retinal vessel calibre measurements by optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101 ( 7 ): 989–992. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309678 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Camino A, Zhang M, Gao SS, Hwang TS, Sharma U, Wilson DJ, et al. Evaluation of artifact reduction in optical coherence tomography angiography with real-time tracking and motion correction technology. Biomed Opt Express. 2016; 7 ( 10 ): 3905–3915. 10.1364/BOE.7.003905 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Alnawaiseh M, Brand C, Lauermann JL, Eter N. Flow density measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography: Impact of age and gender. Ophthalmologe 2018; 115 ( 8 ): 659–662. 10.1007/s00347- 017-0539-2 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Iafe NA, Phasukkijwatana N, Chen X, Sarraf D. Retinal Capillary Density and Foveal Avascular Zone Area Are Age-Dependent: Quantitative

Analysis Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57 ( 13 ): 5780–5787. 10.1167/iovs.16- [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

  1. Alten F, Heiduschka P, Clemens CR, Eter N. Exploring choriocapillaris under reticular pseudodrusen using OCT-Angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016; 254 ( 11 ): 2165–2173. 10.1007/s00417-016-3375- [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Nassisi M, Baghdasaryan E, Tepelus T, Asanad S, Borrelli E, Sadda SR. Topographic distribution of choriocapillaris flow deficits in healthy eyes. PLoS One. 2018. November 15 10.1371/journal.pone. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Spaide RF. Choriocapillaris Flow Features Follow a Power Law Distribution: Implications for Characterization and Mechanisms of Disease Progression. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 170 : 58–67. 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Sacconi R, Borrelli E, Corbelli E, Capone L, Rabiolo A, Carnevali A, et al. Quantitative changes in the ageing choriocapillaris as measured by swept source optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018. October 25 pii: bjophthalmol-2018-313004. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018- 313004 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Milani P, Montesano G, Rossetti L, Bergamini F, Pece A. Vessel density, retinal thickness, and choriocapillaris vascular flow in myopic eyes on OCT angiography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256 ( 8 ): 1419–1427. 10.1007/s00417-018-4012-y [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Sung MS, Heo H, Park SW. Microstructure of Parapapillary Atrophy Is Associated With Parapapillary Microvasculature in Myopic Eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 192 : 157–168. 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.05.022 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee MW, Kim KM, Lim HB, Jo YJ, Kim JY. Repeatability of vessel density measurements using optical coherence tomography angiography in retinal diseases. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018. July 4 pii: bjophthalmol-2018- 312516 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312516 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Alnawaiseh M, Ertmer C, Seidel L, Arnemann PH, Lahme L, Kampmeier TG, et al. Feasibility of optical coherence tomography angiography to assess changes in retinal microcirculation in ovine haemorrhagic shock. Crit Care. 2018; 22 ( 1 ): 138 10.1186/s13054-018-2056-3 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Holló G. Valsalva Maneuver and Peripapillary OCT Angiography Vessel Density. J Glaucoma. 2018. July 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000983 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Mansouri K, Rao HL, Hoskens K, D'Alessandro E, Flores-Reyes EM, Mermoud A, et al. Diurnal Variations of Peripapillary and Macular Vessel Density in Glaucomatous Eyes Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. J Glaucoma. 2018; 27 ( 4 ): 336–341. 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000914 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chua J, Chin CWL, Hong J, Chee ML, Le TT, Ting DSW, et al. Impact of hypertension on retinal capillary microvasculature using optical coherence tomographic angiography. J Hypertens. 2019; 37 ( 3 ): 572–580. 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001916 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Rotsos T, Andreanos K, Blounas S, Brouzas D, Ladas DS, Ladas ID. Multimodal imaging of hypertensive chorioretinopathy by swept-source

coherence tomography. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011; 39 ( 3 ): 215–221. 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2010.02460.x [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

  1. Garas A, Vargha P, Holló G. Reproducibility of retinal nerve fiber layer and macular thickness measurement with the RTVue-100 optical coherence tomograph. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117 ( 4 ):738–746. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.08.039 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Savini G, Carbonelli M, Parisi V, Barboni P. Effect of pupil dilation on retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurements and their repeatability with Cirrus HD-OCT. Eye (Lond). 2010; 24 ( 9 ): 1503–1508. 10.1038/eye.2010. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mwanza JC, Sayyad FE, Banitt MR, Budenz DL. Effect of pupil dilation on macular choroidal thickness measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2013; 33 ( 4 ): 335–341. 10.1007/s10792-012-9689-z [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Savini G, Zanini M, Barboni P. Influence of pupil size and cataract on retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by Stratus OCT. J Glaucoma. 2006; 15 ( 4 ): 336–340. 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212244.64584.c [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Polak K, Dorner G, Kiss B, Polska E, Findl O, Rainer G, et al. Evaluation of the Zeiss retinal vessel analyser. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000; 84 ( 11 ): 1285–
  6. 10.1136/bjo.84.11.1285 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang Q, Chan S, Yang JY, You B, Wang YX, Jonas JB, et al. Vascular Density in Retina and Choriocapillaris as Measured by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016; 168 : 95–109. 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.05.005 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang X, Zheng Y, Kong X, Zhu L, Sun X. The Characteristics of Peripapillary Retinal Perfusion by Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Tessellated Fundus Eyes. PLoS One. 2016. July 27 10.1371/journal.pone.0159911 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang Y, Wang J, Jiang H, Yang X, Feng L, Hu L, et al. Retinal Microvasculature Alteration in High Myopia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57 ( 14 ): 6020–6030. 10.1167/iovs.16-19542 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Al-Sheikh M, Ghasemi Falavarjani K, Akil H, Sadda SR. Impact of image quality on OCT angiography based quantitative measurements. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2017; 3 : 13 10.1186/s40942-017-0068-9 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lauermann JL, Woetzel AK, Treder M, Alnawaiseh M, Clemens CR, Eter N, et al. Prevalences of segmentation errors and motion artifacts in OCT-angiography differ among retinal diseases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018; 256 ( 10 ): 1807–1816. 10.1007/s00417-018-4053- [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Borrelli E, Shi Y, Uji A, Balasubramanian S, Nassisi M, Sarraf D, et al. Topographic Analysis of the Choriocapillaris in Intermediate Age-related Macular Degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018; 196 : 34–43. 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.08.014 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nassisi M, Baghdasaryan E, Borrelli E, Ip M, Sadda SR. Choriocapillaris flow impairment surrounding geographic atrophy correlates with disease progression. PLoS One. 2019; 14 ( 2 ):e0212563 10.1371/journal.pone. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

NLM NIH DHHS USA.gov

  1. Nassisi M, Shi Y, Fan W, Borrelli E, Uji A, Ip MS, et al. Choriocapillaris impairment around the atrophic lesions in patients with geographic atrophy: a swept-source optical coherence tomography angiography study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019; 103 ( 7 ): 911–917. 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018- [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hwang TS, Gao SS, Liu L, Lauer AK, Bailey ST, Flaxel CJ, et al. Automated Quantification of Capillary Nonperfusion Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Diabetic Retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016; 134 ( 4 ): 367–73. 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rosen RB, Andrade Romo JS, Krawitz BD, Mo S, Fawzi AA, Linderman RE, et al. Earliest Evidence of Preclinical Diabetic Retinopathy Revealed Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Perfused Capillary Density. Am J Ophthalmol. 2019.pii: S0002-9394(19)30025-X. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD, 20894 USA Policies and Guidelines | Contact Support CenterSupport Center