Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Outline Unit 3.1, Apuntes de Idioma Inglés

Asignatura: Història de la llengua anglesa, Profesor: , Carrera: Estudis Anglesos, Universidad: UV

Tipo: Apuntes

2016/2017

Subido el 01/12/2017

anonymous0-3
anonymous0-3 🇪🇸

4.1

(75)

72 documentos

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Page 1
35349 History of the English Language
Outlines
UNIT 3.1
I. LANGUAGE FAMILIES AND LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY
A. Syllabic division
A) Consonant + Vowel (CV) labelled ‘open syllable’
a. Japanese, Arabic, Fijian
B) Vowel + Consonant (VC) labelled ‘(blocked/checked/closed)
syllable’
a. Germanic languages (e.g. Swedish and Danish tidskrift
"periodical", German schwatzhaft "talkative", Netherlandic herfst
"autumn" or English strength)
B. Morphosyntactic division (Wilhelm von Humboldt, 1822; our model after
Nikolaus Finck, 1909)
A) ‘Isolating’ (also called ‘monosyllabic’ or ‘analytic’) languages (e.g.
Classical Chinese, Vietnamese). These show isolated, invariable
morphemes, monosyllables and no affixation. They can be subdivided
into:
a. ‘root-isolating’ languages: words are invariable morphs (e.g.
Mandarin Chinese)
b. ‘stem-isolating’ languages: are characterised by possible
desinential inflection which allows for a certain degree of
grammatical order (e.g. Samoan, Indonesian)
B) ‘Agglutinative’ languages (e.g. Turkish, Hungarian, Finnish,
Japanese). These possess several syllables, stem and a certain number
of regular affixes
C) ‘Inflective’ (also called ‘flectional’, ‘inflectional’, ‘amalgamating’,
‘fusional’, ‘fusing’, ‘formal’ or ‘synthetic’ -but see below for specific
labelling) languages (e.g. Latin). These languages possess stem +
various affixes; regular affixation is used with grammatical
(morphological and syntactical) value. They can be subdivided into:
a. ‘Root-inflected’, also called ‘fusional’, or ‘fusing’ which
modify the radical vowel (e.g. Arabic)
b. ‘Stem-inflected’ that modify the inflections (e.g. Latin,
Sanskrit)
c. ‘Group-inflected’ or ‘amalgamating’, which modify entire
groups in free interrelation (e.g. Georgian)
D) ‘Incorporative’, ‘polysynthetic’, ‘agglomerative’, or ‘holophrastic’
languages (e.g. Eskimo and many native American languages including
the Macro-Algonkians of Eastern and central USA plus Eastern and
Central Canada and the Chinookan (e.g. British Columbia) among
them. In these languages verb + subject + objects are all condensed in
one word
E) Objections to this classification:
a. It is based upon biological assumptions that Early Man spoke
in monosyllables and that languages develop organically until
they reach the stage of the flective (Latin, Greek, Germanic)
languages, the same way life has developed from unicellular
pf3
pf4

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Outline Unit 3.1 y más Apuntes en PDF de Idioma Inglés solo en Docsity!

35349 History of the English Language Outlines UNIT 3. I. LANGUAGE FAMILIES AND LINGUISTIC TYPOLOGY A. Syllabic division A) Consonant + Vowel (CV) labelled ‘open syllable’ a. Japanese, Arabic, Fijian B) Vowel + Consonant (VC) labelled ‘(blocked/checked/closed) syllable’ a. Germanic languages (e.g. Swedish and Danish tidskrift "periodical", German schwatzhaft "talkative", Netherlandic herfst "autumn" or English strength ) B. Morphosyntactic division (Wilhelm von Humboldt, 1822; our model after Nikolaus Finck, 1909) A) ‘Isolating’ (also called ‘monosyllabic’ or ‘analytic’) languages (e.g. Classical Chinese, Vietnamese). These show isolated, invariable morphemes, monosyllables and no affixation. They can be subdivided into: a. ‘root-isolating’ languages: words are invariable morphs (e.g. Mandarin Chinese) b. ‘stem-isolating’ languages: are characterised by possible desinential inflection which allows for a certain degree of grammatical order (e.g. Samoan, Indonesian) B) ‘Agglutinative’ languages (e.g. Turkish, Hungarian, Finnish, Japanese). These possess several syllables, stem and a certain number of regular affixes C) ‘Inflective’ (also called ‘flectional’, ‘inflectional’, ‘amalgamating’, ‘fusional’, ‘fusing’, ‘formal’ or ‘synthetic’ - but see below for specific labelling) languages (e.g. Latin). These languages possess stem + various affixes; regular affixation is used with grammatical (morphological and syntactical) value. They can be subdivided into: a. ‘Root-inflected’, also called ‘fusional’, or ‘fusing’ which modify the radical vowel (e.g. Arabic) b. ‘Stem-inflected’ that modify the inflections (e.g. Latin, Sanskrit) c. ‘Group-inflected’ or ‘amalgamating’, which modify entire groups in free interrelation (e.g. Georgian) D) ‘Incorporative’, ‘polysynthetic’, ‘agglomerative’, or ‘holophrastic’ languages (e.g. Eskimo and many native American languages including the Macro-Algonkians of Eastern and central USA plus Eastern and Central Canada and the Chinookan (e.g. British Columbia) among them. In these languages verb + subject + objects are all condensed in one word E) Objections to this classification: a. It is based upon biological assumptions that Early Man spoke in monosyllables and that languages develop organically until they reach the stage of the flective (Latin, Greek, Germanic) languages, the same way life has developed from unicellular

35349 History of the English Language Outlines protozoa to the Homo Sapiens b. This typology sometimes overlaps; the differences between flective and agglutinative languages are ill-defined c. Different languages might appear to be closer related than what they are: so isolating Mandarin Chinese and English vs. Latin, while, morphologically speaking, English is an isolating language derived from a flective one F) ‘Analytical’ vs. ‘synthetic’ languages An easier dichotomy for our purposes a. Within the 'analytical' languages (Vietnamese, Mandarin Chinese, up to a certain degree English) each word is roughly equivalent to a morpheme and to one, sole, semantic value. Only seldom are several morphemes found together in a single word. b. Within the synthetic (inflective and agglutinative), languages are capable of larger segmentation; each word can express various semantic values together and is made up of various grammatically and semantically defined morphemes C. Phonological division A) Segmental criteria a. Voiced/Voiceless phonemes (I.E. languages) b. Click (avulsive) languages (e.g. Hottentot languages) B) Suprasegmental criteria a. Tone-distinctive (polytonic) languages (e.g. Mandarin Chinese, which has 4 distinctive tones) b. Intonation languages (e.g. I.E. languages) c. Stress-distinctive languages (e.g. English, German) D. Syntactic division A) Nominative languages: (e.g. I.E. languages) B) Ergative languages (e.g. Basque, Georgian) E. Biblical division A) Semitic (e.g. Hebrew, Aramaic, Arabic, Ethiopian) B) Hamitic (e.g. Egyptian, Berber dialects) C) Japhetic (European languages, e.g. Greek, Latin) F. Genetic division A) Non-Indoeuropean languages a. Sinic languages (e.g. Chinese, Japanese) a) Uighur (spoken in China) b) Korean, Japanese, Ainu c) Chinese languages: Mandarin, Cantonese and many others d) Tai and Miao-Yao languages (China, Vietnam, Laos, Thailand) e) Tibeto-Burman languages (Central Tibetan, Burmese) b. American Indian languages (more a geographic than a linguistic concept) c. Basque d. Uralic languages e. Finno-Ugric (Finnish, Estonian, Hungarian) f. Altaic (Turkic languages, Mongolian and others)

35349 History of the English Language Outlines b) Balto-Slavic

  1. Baltic
    1. Lettish, Lithuanian, Prussian
  2. Slavic
    1. Southern (Serbo-Croatian)
    2. Western (Polish, Czecho-Slovak)
    3. Eastern (Russian) G. Genetic Tree Theory (A. Schleicher, 1861-1862) Languages evolve from a common proto-language (or Ursprache ) H. Wave Theory (J. Schmidt, 1872) Languages contact and interfere with each other on a synchronic and geographical level This theory is supported by the concept of linguistic alliance or Sprachbund and by dialectological findings that result from geographical neighbourhood, but cannot explain, for example, the influence of Latin upon English or the linguistic ascendance of Rumanian, while it does explain the strong Slavonic influence upon this Romance tongue.