Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


prisma - flow - ...., Ejercicios de Psicoestadística

prisma flow ..................

Tipo: Ejercicios

2021/2022

Subido el 26/11/2025

sara.artiga
sara.artiga 🇪🇸

2 documentos

1 / 1

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of
databases and registers only
*Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the
total number across all databases/registers).
**If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by
automation tools.
Source: Page MJ, et al. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Records identified from*:
Databases (n = )
Registers (n = )
Records removed before
screening:
Duplicate records removed
(n = )
Records marked as ineligible
by automation tools (n = )
Records removed for other
reasons (n = )
Records screened
(n = )
Records excluded**
(n = )
Reports sought for retrieval
(n = )
Reports not retrieved
(n = )
Reports assessed for eligibility
(n = ) Reports excluded:
Reason 1 (n = )
Reason 2 (n = )
Reason 3 (n = )
etc.
Studies included in review
(n = )
Reports of included studies
(n = )
Identification of studies via databases and registers
Identification
Screening
Included

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga prisma - flow - .... y más Ejercicios en PDF de Psicoestadística solo en Docsity!

PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for new systematic reviews which included searches of

databases and registers only

Consider, if feasible to do so, reporting the number of records identified from each database or register searched (rather than the total number across all databases/registers). If automation tools were used, indicate how many records were excluded by a human and how many were excluded by automation tools. Source: Page MJ, et al. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Records identified from: Databases (n = ) Registers (n = ) Records removed before screening : Duplicate records removed (n = ) Records marked as ineligible by automation tools (n = ) Records removed for other reasons (n = ) Records screened (n = ) Records excluded (n = ) Reports sought for retrieval (n = ) Reports not retrieved (n = ) Reports assessed for eligibility (n = ) Reports excluded: Reason 1 (n = ) Reason 2 (n = ) Reason 3 (n = ) etc. Studies included in review (n = ) Reports of included studies (n = ) Identification of studies via databases and registers Identification Screening Included