Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Marx's Analysis of Differential and Absolute Rent and Profit, Apuntes de Economía Ambiental

An analysis of marx's theory on differential and absolute rent and profit in agriculture and industry. It explains the concept of surplus value and how it relates to the productivity of land and capital. The text also discusses the impact of monopolies and the organic composition of capital on rent and profit.

Tipo: Apuntes

2018/2019

Subido el 22/03/2019

DarioCositore86
DarioCositore86 🇪🇸

1 documento

1 / 2

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Rent and Prot
In Marx we distinguish two types of land rent. The rst is the dierential land
rent while the second is the absolute land rent. The rst, in turn, is split into
dierential rent I and dierential rent II. We begin to see the rst type of
dierential rent. It depends on investing the same capital, the same amount of
money, on land with dierent productivity. The second type of dierential rent,
on the other hand, depends on investing dierent capitals, dierent amounts
of money, on land with similar productivity. Thus, in the rst case the surplus
value comes from the productivity of the best land while in the second case it
comes from the productivity of the worst. In turn, absolute ground rent can
come from two factors. On the one hand, from the monopoly on the ground.
The second, instead, depends on the organic composition of capital in the
agricultural sector which, being lower compared to the industrial, allows a
greater production of surplus value and, consequently, a greater value
(greater working time) of the products and of the agricultural production
compared to their production prices determinened by the social necessary
labour time which, implying an higher organic composition of capital
compared to agricultural production, would capture a greater share of social
working time, i.e., of suprlus value by exchanging less labour time coagulated
in industrial production.
The same process takes place within industrial production. The prot we can
thus distinguish it in absolute and relative. The relative, in turn, can be
divided into two parts. Relative prot I arises when the same amount of
capital is invested in productions with dierent degrees of productivity. The
relative prot II arises when dierent amounts of capital are invested in
production with similar degrees of development (productivity). Thus, in the
rst case, the surplus prot comes from the productivity of the highest
industry while in the second case it comes from the productivity of the most
backward industry. Finally, absolute prot depends, on the one hand, on the
private ownership of the means of production (including means of transport,
communication, etc.) and, on the other, from the dierent organic composition
of capital in the industrial sector which, being higher than another industrial
pf2

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Marx's Analysis of Differential and Absolute Rent and Profit y más Apuntes en PDF de Economía Ambiental solo en Docsity!

Rent and Profit

In Marx we distinguish two types of land rent. The first is the differential land rent while the second is the absolute land rent. The first, in turn, is split into differential rent I and differential rent II. We begin to see the first type of differential rent. It depends on investing the same capital, the same amount of money, on land with different productivity. The second type of differential rent, on the other hand, depends on investing different capitals, different amounts of money, on land with similar productivity. Thus, in the first case the surplus value comes from the productivity of the best land while in the second case it comes from the productivity of the worst. In turn, absolute ground rent can come from two factors. On the one hand, from the monopoly on the ground. The second, instead, depends on the organic composition of capital in the agricultural sector which, being lower compared to the industrial, allows a greater production of surplus value and, consequently, a greater value (greater working time) of the products and of the agricultural production compared to their production prices determinened by the social necessary labour time which, implying an higher organic composition of capital compared to agricultural production, would capture a greater share of social working time, i.e., of suprlus value by exchanging less labour time coagulated in industrial production.

The same process takes place within industrial production. The profit we can thus distinguish it in absolute and relative. The relative, in turn, can be divided into two parts. Relative profit I arises when the same amount of capital is invested in productions with different degrees of productivity. The relative profit II arises when different amounts of capital are invested in production with similar degrees of development (productivity). Thus, in the first case, the surplus profit comes from the productivity of the highest industry while in the second case it comes from the productivity of the most backward industry. Finally, absolute profit depends, on the one hand, on the private ownership of the means of production (including means of transport, communication, etc.) and, on the other, from the different organic composition of capital in the industrial sector which, being higher than another industrial

sector or higher than the social average and being in addition higher than the agricultural production, it allows a greater hoarding of surplus value produced in industries with a lower organic composition of capital or of the agricultural sector and, consequently, a lower value (less working time) of industrial products and industrial production than their production prices determinened by the social necessary labour time which, implying a lower organic composition of capital compared to backward industrial or agricultural sector, would capture a greater share of social working time, i.e., of suprlus value by exchanging less labour time coagulated in industrial production.