Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Understanding Audiences: Uses, Gratifications, and Decoding Media, Apuntes de Comunicación Audiovisual

Various theories on how audiences engage with media, focusing on uses and gratifications theory and stuart hall's encoding/decoding model. The theories discuss how audiences satisfy their personal and social needs through media consumption, and how they interpret and decode media messages based on their social and cultural positions. The document also touches upon the criticisms and limitations of these theories.

Tipo: Apuntes

2018/2019

Subido el 12/09/2019

ineslatre
ineslatre 🇪🇸

2 documentos

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
I NVEST I GATI NG AUDI ENCES: WHAT DO PEOPL E DO WI TH MEDI A?
About Audienc e
We define audience as consumers of all kind of media: TV, radio, press,
Internet…, considering the differences they have in the way of approaching each media
form.
We consider that the audience is active when it does not only receive
information but is involved with the media and reacts to its products (comment a TV
show, complain about a film´s end…).
Uses and Grat if ic ati ons Theory
The “uses and gratifications” theory states that the audiences approach media in
order to satisfy/gratify their personal or social needs. In addition, they make different
rational “uses” of it that could be explained. McQuail classifies in four the uses and
gratifications that people pursue:
Surveillance: using media in order to satisfy their need of information about the
world. A way of doing this is by consuming current affairs (newspapers, news
bulletins…). This somehow transforms media into a “fourth state” responsible of
the insight and guidance of society. Nevertheless, it also works as an element of
discussion among people.
Personal identity: refers to the way in which media play a part in defining us. It
can be through our preferences and tastes but also when approaching fictional
characters with who we can identify ourselves or not, or even wish to be like
them (what we could call “role models”).
Personal relationships: we may use media in order to guide our way of acting in
personal situations. Also, knowledge of and consumption of particular types of
media may open the doors to us in terms of personal relationships.
Diversion: we use media in order to relax, escape from our live, or just for
pleasure.
This theory approaches audiences as individuals engaging with media, rather
than a distant and amorphous construction of market or scientific research. Even though
it leaves space for the plurality of audiences´ interpretation, it has been criticised in
different aspects:
Its individualism, which relies way too much on assumptions about the audience
member´s psychology and personality, lacking also of social and cultural
perspectives that might condition the categories previously mentioned.
Its consumerist perspective of media use, only oriented to their aims or goals but
without making a critical reflexion of their uses and gratifications.
Its lack of attention to the content other than in very broad terms.
It is an interesting approach to what do audiences with media, but has not
addressed multiple issues that we could consider worthy of investigation when talking
pf3
pf4

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Understanding Audiences: Uses, Gratifications, and Decoding Media y más Apuntes en PDF de Comunicación Audiovisual solo en Docsity!

INVESTIGATINGAUDIENCES: WHATDOPEOPLEDOWITHMEDIA?

About Audience

We define audience as consumers of all kind of media: TV, radio, press, Internet…, considering the differences they have in the way of approaching each media form.

We consider that the audience is active when it does not only receive information but is involved with the media and reacts to its products (comment a TV show, complain about a film´s end…).

UsesandGratificationsTheory

The “uses and gratifications” theory states that the audiences approach media in order to satisfy/gratify their personal or social needs. In addition, they make different rational “uses” of it that could be explained. McQuail classifies in four the uses and gratifications that people pursue:

  • Surveillance: using media in order to satisfy their need of information about the world. A way of doing this is by consuming current affairs (newspapers, news bulletins…). This somehow transforms media into a “fourth state” responsible of the insight and guidance of society. Nevertheless, it also works as an element of discussion among people.
  • Personal identity: refers to the way in which media play a part in defining us. It can be through our preferences and tastes but also when approaching fictional characters with who we can identify ourselves or not, or even wish to be like them (what we could call “role models”).
  • Personal relationships: we may use media in order to guide our way of acting in personal situations. Also, knowledge of and consumption of particular types of media may open the doors to us in terms of personal relationships.
  • Diversion: we use media in order to relax, escape from our live, or just for pleasure.

This theory approaches audiences as individuals engaging with media, rather than a distant and amorphous construction of market or scientific research. Even though it leaves space for the plurality of audiences´ interpretation, it has been criticised in different aspects:

  • Its individualism, which relies way too much on assumptions about the audience member´s psychology and personality, lacking also of social and cultural perspectives that might condition the categories previously mentioned.
  • Its consumerist perspective of media use, only oriented to their aims or goals but without making a critical reflexion of their uses and gratifications.
  • Its lack of attention to the content other than in very broad terms.

It is an interesting approach to what do audiences with media, but has not addressed multiple issues that we could consider worthy of investigation when talking

about consumption such as social and domestic contexts and relations, agendas of media organizations and producers and the way in which we derive meaning from media texts.

Stuart Hall´s“Encoding/DecodingModel”

Stuart Hall defended that traditionally, researchers of mass-communication have approached the process of communication as a circulation loop, which has been criticised for its linearity (sender/message/receiver) concentrating way too much on the level on the message and not really considering the conception of the different moments as a complex structure of relations.

This is why he developed a theoretical way of thinking of the context in which media are made and interpreted and also of the relationship between the producer, text and the audience. This relationship could be encapsulated in the title of his theory: encoding/decoding.

Messages are part of a process in which they are encoded during the production and decoded in the consumption. This phenomenon takes place in a complex social structure in which the message is not isolated. In addition, media institutions set their own agendas, which means they have the power to decide what is important as media content and how they want it to be presented. Then, audience make what they can or will with this information that media presents them as well as make their own reading considering their social and cultural positions that underwrite how they are disposed to read and interpret this signs.

Producers and audiences share the systems of interpretation, but there are many individual factors that conditionate it. Hall classifies a series of different parameters to understand how the audiences make sense of the media´s influences. They are:

  • The dominant set of ideas in media texts are those who present a “preferred” reading amongst audiences, which if accepted, ratifies particular ways of seeing the world.
  • An oppositional reading is the one in which the message is understood but rejected.
  • A negotiated meaning is one in which the preferred meaning is accepted but it is mixed with oppositional positions that depend on the context of interpretation.

In this production-consumption relationships, text are made so the meaning is fixed. Nevertheless, while the interpretation is tied to context, that is why the message produced will never be the same as the consumed. This is believed to be a problem when the message and the behaviour of the consumer are directly linked.

DavidMorley

Stuart Hall´s encoding and decoding model feds into the innovative work of David Morley. Since Hall offered is theory as in need of exploration, his student, Morley, took on the encoding and decoding theory in order to explore the way in which audiences form different socio-economic backgrounds.

The study tended to confirm Hall´s model of interpretation, in which it was lightly supported a direct correlation between social position and receptivity to the

such as Dorothy Hobson who drew from the conversations of women´s lunch breaks to talk about their pleasure for soap operas.