Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


Unit 1Approach VS Method , Apuntes de Idioma Inglés

Asignatura: lengua inglesa avanzada, Profesor: Carmen Pastor, Carrera: Estudios Ingleses, Universidad: UMA

Tipo: Apuntes

2016/2017

Subido el 31/07/2017

olprn
olprn 🇪🇸

3.8

(20)

14 documentos

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
Unit 1
Approach VS Method
Method tidy way to get to a result, specially the truth or to sistematice our
knowledge. It is the way of teaching.
Approach it is getting something, a result, focusing on an specific topic.
Context in Approaches to Grammar
Each approach in grammar makes assumptions about:
Nature of language
Develops its own techniques
Terminology for grammatical analysis
The focus on the relationship between grammar, context and how a number of
approaches to grammar consider this and have things to say about it.
1. Types of Approaches
Formal “set of rules which specify all the possible grammatical structures of
language”
A distinction between ungrammatical and grammatical sentences is made but the
primary concern is together with the forms of grammatical structures and their
relationship rather than in meaning or use in different contexts.
Set of rules, structure of sentences // traditional and generative grammar
Functional it sees language first as a system of communication and analyses
grammar to discover how it is originated to allow speakers and writers to make
and exchange meanings. The focus is on the appropriateness of a form for a
particular communication purpose in a particular context. The primary concern
is with the functions of structures, constituents and also meaning in context.
Context, semantics, pragmatics, use of language, communication, interaction,
appropriateness, frequency // systematic, emergent and pattern grammar.
2. Types of Grammar
Traditional it is concerned with linguistic forms and grammatical meaning,
acknowledgement of the relationship between context and grammatical is
limited. There is little or no attempt to describe which grammatical forms might
be considered appropriate or possible in given social situations, limited
comment on potential difference between spoken and written English.
Generative it contains the most influential approaches given by Chomsky and
it differs from traditional grammar in a number of fundamental aspects:
1. Formal apparatus for representing language is radically different.
E.g.: traditional grammar sees a noun as ‘a word used for naming a
person...’ while generative grammar defines it in formal terms,
pf3

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga Unit 1Approach VS Method y más Apuntes en PDF de Idioma Inglés solo en Docsity!

Unit 1

Approach VS Method

  • Method tidy way to get to a result, specially the truth or to sistematice our knowledge. It is the way of teaching.
  • Approach it is getting something, a result, focusing on an specific topic.

Context in Approaches to Grammar

Each approach in grammar makes assumptions about:

  • Nature of language
  • Develops its own techniques
  • Terminology for grammatical analysis

The focus on the relationship between grammar, context and how a number of approaches to grammar consider this and have things to say about it.

  1. Types of Approaches
  • Formal “set of rules which specify all the possible grammatical structures of language”

A distinction between ungrammatical and grammatical sentences is made but the primary concern is together with the forms of grammatical structures and their relationship rather than in meaning or use in different contexts.

Set of rules, structure of sentences // traditional and generative grammar

  • Functional it sees language first as a system of communication and analyses grammar to discover how it is originated to allow speakers and writers to make and exchange meanings. The focus is on the appropriateness of a form for a particular communication purpose in a particular context. The primary concern is with the functions of structures, constituents and also meaning in context.

Context, semantics, pragmatics, use of language, communication, interaction, appropriateness, frequency // systematic, emergent and pattern grammar.

  1. Types of Grammar
  • Traditional it is concerned with linguistic forms and grammatical meaning, acknowledgement of the relationship between context and grammatical is limited. There is little or no attempt to describe which grammatical forms might be considered appropriate or possible in given social situations, limited comment on potential difference between spoken and written English.
  • Generative it contains the most influential approaches given by Chomsky and it differs from traditional grammar in a number of fundamental aspects: 1. Formal apparatus for representing language is radically different. E.g.: traditional grammar sees a noun as ‘a word used for naming a person...’ while generative grammar defines it in formal terms,

referring perhaps to the fact that a noun occurs before plural or its alternant.

  1. Chomsky rejected the view that a grammatical description should account for what is observed in a body data. Instead, he argued that a grammar should be able to generate all the grammatical but none of the ungrammatical sentences of a language.
  2. The concert is to represent the relationship between linguistic features and the innate ability of human beings to master language. It is assumed that people have a innate system of rules in other words, a grammar; some of these rules are universal in that all human beings posses them, while other are language specific.

“not all of the language produced by a native speaker will reflect their knowledge of language”

Chomsky considers that grammar is independent of the study of the use of language situation.

  • Systematic functional it places the social context of language and explores how language is used and how it is structured for this use in its centre. Halliday considers that the clause in the unit in which three different kinds of meaning are combined: - Experimental: concerned with content and ideas. - Interpersonal: concerned with the relationship between participants in the interaction between participants in the interaction and the speaker/ writer’s attitude towards the context. - Textual: concerned with how the language is used to organise the text itself. We can look at the clause from each of these perspectives which all suggest a different way of dividing up a clause and labelling its components parts:
  1. Transitivity: grammatical resource for expressing the experimental function.
  2. Mood: grammatical resource for expressing the interpersonal function.
  3. Information Structure: theme (topic) and rhyme (content), grammatical resource for expressing textual function.

Systematic functional grammar recognises a hierarchy of grammatical unit: words make up groups which make up clauses. Above the clause is a clause complexes rather than sentences. The analysis of texts is common and the main aim is to consider how the social context in which it was created is reflected in the text. Not only is language influenced by the context in which it is used, it is also considered to influence that context.

  • Emergent context and communication are the core of grammar. Paul Hopper argues that the starting point of grammar is communication. The resulting discourse will include routines or repeated patterns of language. The categories of these irregularities constitute grammar which will emerge from interaction. Language is seen to be largely a collection of formulaic or constructions which speakers will borrow or adapt from previous experiences. Different routines will emerge relevant to the context. When enough routines have similar patterns form part of a system of the grammar. Because speaker will have more or lose