Docsity
Docsity

Prepara tus exámenes
Prepara tus exámenes

Prepara tus exámenes y mejora tus resultados gracias a la gran cantidad de recursos disponibles en Docsity


Consigue puntos base para descargar
Consigue puntos base para descargar

Gana puntos ayudando a otros estudiantes o consíguelos activando un Plan Premium


Orientación Universidad
Orientación Universidad


UNIT 3: SPEECH ACT THEORY, Resúmenes de Filología

UNIT 2: THE SEMANTICS-PRAGMATICS INTERFACE + PRACTICAS

Tipo: Resúmenes

2021/2022

Subido el 09/05/2022

anon444d
anon444d 🇪🇸

4

(4)

8 documentos

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

Esta página no es visible en la vista previa

¡No te pierdas las partes importantes!

bg1
UNIT 3
3.1. !Performative and constative acts "
Performative > to perform (to act, carry out an action)"
Speech act theory "
In class activity: What these utterances have in common?"
I bet you six pence it will rain tomorrow."
I hereby christen this ship the Queen Elizabeth II."
I declare war on ..."
I apologise.
I object.
I bequeath you my Picasso. "
Answer: all the speakers preform something, all of them have the first person singular,
performative verb, all of them are in present simple, perform an action and the intention of
the speaker. The action changes reality. "
PERFORMATIVES
Cannot be true or false."
Syntactically, performatives seem to share three common features:"
– They are declarative sentences in present simple."
The subject is always the first person pronoun – referring to the speaker(s). (can be
plural or singular)"
Performative verbs will take the adverb “hereby” . (this word can be include. “Por la
presente….”)"
I hereby declare you Mayor of Canterbury”."
(?)“I hereby jog ten miles on Sundays.” This is not performative because it does not
have an eect in reality nor it changes. This is constative and can be true or false. "
PROBLEMS WITH THE THEORY
However, these distinctive features are not so clear and Austin soon had to reformulate
his performative hypothesis."
When faced with examples as the following ones, we see that:"
– “I betted you five pounds...”"
(Performative verbs can be used non-performatively)"
– “You are hereby warned”"
(The subject is not necessarily the first person pronoun)"
– “Guilty!”"
pf3
pf4
pf5

Vista previa parcial del texto

¡Descarga UNIT 3: SPEECH ACT THEORY y más Resúmenes en PDF de Filología solo en Docsity!

UNIT 3

3.1. Performative and constative acts Performative > to perform (to act, carry out an action) Speech act theory In class activity: What these utterances have in common?

  • I bet you six pence it will rain tomorrow.
  • I hereby christen this ship the Queen Elizabeth II.
  • I declare war on ...
  • I apologise.
  • I object.
  • I bequeath you my Picasso. Answer: all the speakers preform something, all of them have the first person singular, performative verb, all of them are in present simple, perform an action and the intention of the speaker. The action changes reality. PERFORMATIVES
  • Cannot be true or false.
  • Syntactically, performatives seem to share three common features:
  • They are declarative sentences in present simple.
  • The subject is always the first person pronoun – referring to the speaker(s). (can be plural or singular)
  • Performative verbs will take the adverb “hereby”. (this word can be include. “Por la presente….”)
  • I hereby declare you Mayor of Canterbury”.
  • (?)“ I hereby jog ten miles on Sundays.” This is not performative because it does not have an effect in reality nor it changes. This is constative and can be true or false. PROBLEMS WITH THE THEORY
  • However, these distinctive features are not so clear and Austin soon had to reformulate his performative hypothesis.
  • When faced with examples as the following ones, we see that:
  • “I betted you five pounds...” (Performative verbs can be used non-performatively)
  • “You are hereby warned” (The subject is not necessarily the first person pronoun)
  • “Guilty!”

(Sometimes, there are cases that do not contain a verb at all) A POSSIBLE SOLUTION

  • It is possible then to distinguish two kinds of performatives (Levinson, 1983; Thomas, 1995: 47)
  • explicit performatives (or primary performatives in Austin’s terms) that speakers use when they want to be unambiguous. You utter.
  • implicit performatives , which also carry out an action but using other devices such as mood, adverbs, intonation, etc. No subject. In class activity:
  • “Shut the door” IMPLICIT (SYNTACTICALLY THERE’S NO SUBJECT)
  • “I order you to shut the door”. EXPLICIT
  • • “I’ll be there without fail” IMPLICIT (PERFORMING A PROMISE) TO MAKE IT EXPLICIT: I PROMISE…
  • “I promise I’ll be there”. EXPLICIT
  • “Therefore, …” IMPLICIT (NO “I”, NO PRESENT SIMPLE)
  • “I conclude that…” EXPLICIT ONE MORE PROBLEM
  • “I state that I am alone responsible”
  • Can be considered as both a performative and a constative (based on true-false conditions) • Austin’s solution:
  • the performative/constative dichotomy was untenable since there is no real incompatibility between utterances being truth-bearers (constatives) and simultaneously performing actions (performatives).
  • Finally, Austin admitted a whole family of speech acts where constatives and performatives were particular members 3. 2. The utterances as Act Locutive, illocutionary, and perlocutionary force When we utter a sentence we are also performing actions
  • Austin isolates three kinds of acts that are simultaneously performed when saying something:
  1. locutionary act: the utterance of a sentence (the actual words uttered) Example: If someone asks you to go the party with them and you respond “nah”
  2. illocutionary act (aka illocutionary force ): the force or intention behind the words (promising, offering, warning, etc.) Example: what you really mean so that “nah” would mean “no way I’m going with you”

(If there is no satisfactory uptake on the hearer’s part –“you’re on” or something similar, condition B (ii) is not fulfilled). 3.3. Types of Speech Acts SEARLE’S TAXONOMY (Exam)

1. Representatives: The speaker states what s/he believes to be the case (describing, claiming, insisting, predicting, etc.) (Austin’s constatives) They state facts of reality. E.g. “It’s cold in here” 2. Directives: The speaker aims at making the hearer to do something (commanding, requesting, inviting, forbidding, suggesting, etc.) E.g. “Be quiet, please” 3. Commissives: The speaker commits him/herself to future action (promising, offering, threatening, refusing, vowing, volunteering, etc.) E.g. I’ll help you if you have any problems. 4. Expressives: The speaker states what s/he feels (apologising, praising, congratulating, deploring, regretting, etc.) E.g. I feel I should have apologised for my behaviour. 5. Declaratives: The speaker changes the world (reality) by the very utterance of the words. (Austin’s performatives) E.g.“I hereby declare you husband and wife” Examples

  • The fact that girls have been outstripping boys academically has been acknowledged for the past 12 years or so. (Glasgow Herald: 28 November 2000). REPRESENTATIVE
  • From ghoulis and ghosties and long-leggety beasties / and things that go bump in the night, / Good Lord, deliver us. (Scottish prayer) DIRECTIVE (BECAUSE WHEN YOU ARE PRAYING YOU WANT THAT GOD GIVES THAT TO YOU)
  • I’ll love you, dear, I’ll love you / till China and Africa meet, / and the river jumps over the mountain / and the salmon sing in the street. (Auden) COMMISSIVES
  • To a hostess who had sent an invitation stating “Mrs Eleanor Higgins will be at home 10 April 7-9 pm”, Bernard Shaw succintly replied: “So will G. Bernard Shaw”. DECLARATIVE (THE ONE WHO SENDS THE INVITATION) COMMISSIVES (BY BERNARD SHAW)