Docsity
Docsity

Prepara i tuoi esami
Prepara i tuoi esami

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity


Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Ottieni i punti per scaricare

Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium


Guide e consigli
Guide e consigli


Lingua Inglese - Relative Clauses, Schemi e mappe concettuali di Lingua Inglese

Dispensa di Grammatica di Lingua Inglese. Argomenti: relative clauses,restrictive,non restrictive<br />

Tipologia: Schemi e mappe concettuali

Pre 2010

Caricato il 27/09/2010

ilariaM
ilariaM 🇮🇹

4.4

(3181)

996 documenti

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima

Non perderti parti importanti!

bg1
WEEK 7: RELATIVE CLAUSES (LSGSWE, pp. 279-291)
See also http://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/clauses/relativeclauses.htm
Relative clauses can be:
1. RESTRICTIVE (defining): they identify the intended reference of the head noun. They pinpoint
the particular head being referred to.
2. NON-RESTRICTIVE (non-defining): they add elaborating, descriptive information about a head
noun that has already been identified or is assumed to be known.
Look at the following definition by the Longman Dictionary: it tells us which or what sort of person
we are talking about:
Ex1: A swot is someone who spends too much time studying and seems to have no other
interests (in infomal British English).
In the following example the relative clause tells us what sort of children were in the hospital.
Ex2: The hospital was full of children who/that had been injured in the fighting.
Ex3: The books which/that belong in this section are labelled with a white sticker.
Look at what happens if the relative clauses are removed from these sentences.
- A swot is someone.
- The hospital was full of children.
- The books are labelled with a white sticker.
From these examples, it is clear the a restrictive relative clause is a necessary part of the clause: the
first example makes no sense at all; the second makes sense, but its meaning is unclear as we do not
know whether the children were patients or merely visitors to the hospital; the third is not a truthful
statement, as it leads us to believe that all the books have stickers, which is not the case.
A non-restrictive relative clause, on the other hand, is not necessary in the sentence, but serves to
give additional information. Non-restrictive relative clauses are usually separated by commas.
Ex4: American Airlines, which began the daily flights to Chicago less than a
year ago, accused the government of being partly to blame.
In this case it is possible to omit the relative clause and still have a perfectly acceptable, clear and
truthful sentence. In fact, the identity of the head noun is already well-known to the readers, and the
non-defining relative clause is used to add newsworthy but INCIDENTAL information about the
referent.
- American Airlines accused the government of being partly to blame.
There are three key components related to relative clauses:
1. The HEAD NOUN (the noun modified by the relative clause);
pf3

Anteprima parziale del testo

Scarica Lingua Inglese - Relative Clauses e più Schemi e mappe concettuali in PDF di Lingua Inglese solo su Docsity!

WEEK 7: RELATIVE CLAUSES (LSGSWE, pp. 279-291) See also http://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/clauses/relativeclauses.htm

Relative clauses can be:

1. RESTRICTIVE (defining): they identify the intended reference of the head noun. They pinpoint the particular head being referred to. 2. NON-RESTRICTIVE (non-defining): they add elaborating, descriptive information about a head noun that has already been identified or is assumed to be known.

Look at the following definition by the Longman Dictionary: it tells us which or what sort of person we are talking about:

Ex1: A swot is someone who spends too much time studying and seems to have no other interests (in infomal British English).

In the following example the relative clause tells us what sort of children were in the hospital.

Ex2: The hospital was full of children who/that had been injured in the fighting. Ex3: The books which/that belong in this section are labelled with a white sticker.

Look at what happens if the relative clauses are removed from these sentences.

  • A swot is someone.
  • The hospital was full of children.
  • The books are labelled with a white sticker.

From these examples, it is clear the a restrictive relative clause is a necessary part of the clause: the first example makes no sense at all; the second makes sense, but its meaning is unclear as we do not know whether the children were patients or merely visitors to the hospital; the third is not a truthful statement, as it leads us to believe that all the books have stickers, which is not the case.

A non-restrictive relative clause , on the other hand, is not necessary in the sentence, but serves to give additional information. Non-restrictive relative clauses are usually separated by commas.

Ex4: American Airlines, which began the daily flights to Chicago less than a year ago , accused the government of being partly to blame.

In this case it is possible to omit the relative clause and still have a perfectly acceptable, clear and truthful sentence. In fact, the identity of the head noun is already well-known to the readers, and the non-defining relative clause is used to add newsworthy but INCIDENTAL information about the referent.

  • American Airlines accused the government of being partly to blame.

There are three key components related to relative clauses:

  1. The HEAD NOUN (the noun modified by the relative clause);
  1. The RELATIVIZER - WHO, THAT, WHICH, WHOM, WHOSE, WHERE, WHEN, WHY - which introduces the relative clause and refers to the same person or thing as the head noun;
  2. The GAP (the location of the missing constituent in the relative clause).

EX5: “I like the nice evening dress that she was wearing yesterday”

The head noun is “dress”, the relativizer is “that” (referring to dress) and the gap occurs in the direct object position after the verb “was wearing”.

If you have two independent sentences and you want to join them into one longer sentence with a relative clause, you will use a non-restrictive relative clause. There are a few important things to remember about this type of relative clause:

a) the relative pronouns used are who , which and the possessive relative pronoun whose ( that is only found in restrictive relative clauses );

b) a non-restrictive relative clause is always separated from the main clause by a comma/commas;

c) who and whose must come immediately after the person they refer to;

d) which can either refer to the thing immediately preceding it, or to the whole clause preceding it.

EXAMPLES:

  • Steven Spielberg's film tells the story of the German industrialist Oskar Schindler, who saved the lives of more than a thousand Jews during the Second World War.
  • Henri Matisse was one the leaders of the Fauve Movement, which developed in Paris after 1904, and was characterised by the use of intense colours.
  • Within months of its election victory the government announced plans to privatise the health service, which produced a huge public outcry.
  • Charles Darwin, whose revolutionary theory of evolution was to shock many of his Victorian contemporaries, failed to graduate in Medicine at Edinburgh University.

BUT WE DO NOT SAY

*Charles Darwin failed to graduate in Medicine at Edinburgh University, whose revolutionary theory of evolution was to shock many of his Victorian contemporaries.

Notice that postmodifiers other than relative clauses can be classified by restrictive and non-restrictive functions (see LSGSWE 9.7.1). The great majority of post-modifiers are restrictive.

Ex. 1: ING-clauses (RESTRICTIVE): “The Ethiopian army is failing to halt northern rebels advancing rapidly southwards to the capital city.