

Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Dispensa di Grammatica di Lingua Inglese. Argomenti: relative clauses,restrictive,non restrictive<br />
Tipologia: Schemi e mappe concettuali
1 / 3
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!


WEEK 7: RELATIVE CLAUSES (LSGSWE, pp. 279-291) See also http://www.edict.com.hk/vlc/clauses/relativeclauses.htm
Relative clauses can be:
1. RESTRICTIVE (defining): they identify the intended reference of the head noun. They pinpoint the particular head being referred to. 2. NON-RESTRICTIVE (non-defining): they add elaborating, descriptive information about a head noun that has already been identified or is assumed to be known.
Look at the following definition by the Longman Dictionary: it tells us which or what sort of person we are talking about:
Ex1: A swot is someone who spends too much time studying and seems to have no other interests (in infomal British English).
In the following example the relative clause tells us what sort of children were in the hospital.
Ex2: The hospital was full of children who/that had been injured in the fighting. Ex3: The books which/that belong in this section are labelled with a white sticker.
Look at what happens if the relative clauses are removed from these sentences.
From these examples, it is clear the a restrictive relative clause is a necessary part of the clause: the first example makes no sense at all; the second makes sense, but its meaning is unclear as we do not know whether the children were patients or merely visitors to the hospital; the third is not a truthful statement, as it leads us to believe that all the books have stickers, which is not the case.
A non-restrictive relative clause , on the other hand, is not necessary in the sentence, but serves to give additional information. Non-restrictive relative clauses are usually separated by commas.
Ex4: American Airlines, which began the daily flights to Chicago less than a year ago , accused the government of being partly to blame.
In this case it is possible to omit the relative clause and still have a perfectly acceptable, clear and truthful sentence. In fact, the identity of the head noun is already well-known to the readers, and the non-defining relative clause is used to add newsworthy but INCIDENTAL information about the referent.
There are three key components related to relative clauses:
EX5: “I like the nice evening dress that she was wearing yesterday”
The head noun is “dress”, the relativizer is “that” (referring to dress) and the gap occurs in the direct object position after the verb “was wearing”.
If you have two independent sentences and you want to join them into one longer sentence with a relative clause, you will use a non-restrictive relative clause. There are a few important things to remember about this type of relative clause:
a) the relative pronouns used are who , which and the possessive relative pronoun whose ( that is only found in restrictive relative clauses );
b) a non-restrictive relative clause is always separated from the main clause by a comma/commas;
c) who and whose must come immediately after the person they refer to;
d) which can either refer to the thing immediately preceding it, or to the whole clause preceding it.
EXAMPLES:
BUT WE DO NOT SAY
*Charles Darwin failed to graduate in Medicine at Edinburgh University, whose revolutionary theory of evolution was to shock many of his Victorian contemporaries.
Notice that postmodifiers other than relative clauses can be classified by restrictive and non-restrictive functions (see LSGSWE 9.7.1). The great majority of post-modifiers are restrictive.
Ex. 1: ING-clauses (RESTRICTIVE): “The Ethiopian army is failing to halt northern rebels advancing rapidly southwards to the capital city. ”