



















































































Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Prepara i tuoi esami
Studia grazie alle numerose risorse presenti su Docsity
Prepara i tuoi esami con i documenti condivisi da studenti come te su Docsity
Trova i documenti specifici per gli esami della tua università
Preparati con lezioni e prove svolte basate sui programmi universitari!
Rispondi a reali domande d’esame e scopri la tua preparazione
Riassumi i tuoi documenti, fagli domande, convertili in quiz e mappe concettuali
Studia con prove svolte, tesine e consigli utili
Togliti ogni dubbio leggendo le risposte alle domande fatte da altri studenti come te
Esplora i documenti più scaricati per gli argomenti di studio più popolari
Ottieni i punti per scaricare
Guadagna punti aiutando altri studenti oppure acquistali con un piano Premium
Effective communication strategies, focusing on theories, nonverbal communication, and persuasion techniques. It covers key concepts such as message exchange, the role of context, cognitive and emotional dimensions, and behavioral outcomes. It also delves into nonverbal communication, including encoding and decoding emotions, lie detection errors, and the impact of body language. Furthermore, it discusses persuasive communication, fear appeals, and principles of conscious business, providing a comprehensive overview of communication dynamics and their practical applications. Useful for students and professionals seeking to enhance their understanding and skills in communication.
Tipologia: Appunti
1 / 91
Questa pagina non è visibile nell’anteprima
Non perderti parti importanti!




















































































March 3rd
INTRODUCTION
The communicative act: the communicative act is defined as the smallest part of communication that can be studied and broken down into three components: source, message and recipient. It is important also to take into account the context (either explicit or implicit). This is the basis to study birth communication and persuasion.
The power and specificity of non verbal communication: non verbal communication is effective in transmitting attitudes and emotions. It can be expressed in two main ways: posture and facial expression.
Persuasive communication: the language of persuasion is important for the success of campaigns. The aim is to make the audience do or believe something.
Heuristics: simplify way of reasoning. When we have to make decisions in situations of information overload we are inclined to simplify our reasoning. In some cases, this may lead to negative behaviors. This is exploited by companies in order to persuade the audience.
March 25
=> Communication is defined by two basic characteristics:
Since there is no such thing as no behavior, we cannot not behave. Even when behavior is salient. We are still communicating. Therefore, there is no such thing as non communication. Every behavior is communication. You cannot not communicate. It means that communication is not necessarily linked to intention. All scholars that belonged to the Palo Alto group agree with this. Communication does not need to be intentional to be defined as communication.
Human communication can be described as ‘’ a process of message exchanges in a social environment, involving cognitive activities, emotional states and behavioral outcomes .’’ (Geiger and Bradac 1996, Blackwell Encyclopedia)
This definition considers communication as a process of message exchanges and it is an exchange of cognitive activities, emotional states and behavioral outcomes. These Are the three dimensions usually studied by psychologists. The social environment is another crucial element we should take into account. While addressing communication we should always take into account the context in which communication takes place.
It refers to the process of reception, interpretation and store into our memory. It is the second moment of communication and it is the reception of the message. It requires a certain level of effort to understand the content of the message. It can be break down into three: perception, recognition and interpretation. We first perceive the message, then we recognize signs. This is based on the knowledge of a common code. The sender and receiver have to share a common code. Lastly, we interpret the message. It is the continuous reconstruction of the message. We interpret the meaning. However, individuals may interpret the same message in different ways. Expectations can play a role in this. We may have certain expectations also due to attitudes (whether positive or negatives). Also personality is relevant. People with high self esteem may protect themselves towards certain informations, on the on the other hand, individuals with a lower self esteem may weigh more negative information. We may also make some decoding mistakes. This occurs when the two individuals do not share the same system of meanings.
Channel > means through which the message passes through
We refer to the difference between the verbal channel and non-verbal channel. The verbal channel refers to words while the non-verbal one refers to body language. The non- verbal one is often more complex and articulated. It is the physical medium that makes the transmission of the message possible. Channels have different features: capacity and immediacy. Capacity is the amount of information the channel can transmit over a specific unit of time. For example, the verbal channel has a big capacity. The nonverbal channel has a lower capacity. Immediacy is the speed in which information is passed on. Both the verbal and non verbal channels are very much interconnected. Therefore we should not consider them separately.
Background or Context > spatial and temporal context / physical or non context in which the people are communicating, also take into account the psychological dimension of the context
When we address the context, we need to address different dimensions: time and space. The first thing to analyze is the place. Do the sender and the receiver are in the same place? Secondly, the time. Is it real time communication or do they communicate at different times? The psychological context and level of communication is also relevant. Psychological context is the experience and values of the communicator. We can distinguish the context into explicit and implicit. The explicit context is everything that has to do with the signs we are communicating, and also non verbal communication. The implicit context refers to the set of broader meaning to which both the sender and receiver can refer to. This occurs when we use jokes. In the pragmatic context I can communicate with the other person if the explicit and implicit context match. The source may use implicit communication: to avoid and manage conflict, to detect lies, to respect social norms and to criticize using apparently an ironic tone.
a lot of debate when it was proposed > idea of comm is a unidirectional process
The message can go from sender to receiver when there is an overlap between the fields of experience, the backgrounds > if the backgrounds are matching the message can be reached
A more elaborated model which is built on the mathematical model designed by Shannon and Weaver is the following. Communication is seen as a more dynamic mechanism. Here we have to add two new elements. In order for communication to be effective there must be an area of overlap between the field of experience of the sender and the one of the receiver. Only in this phase does the message get through. If this overlap is missing the message does not pass. The message is then transformed into a feedback which goes back to the source.
This is called the feedback loop. It is very important because it gives circularity to the process. It allows to decode the message and encode the message again on the basis of the feedback. Interactive communication
= the understanding of an expression/communication takes place on the basis of background assumptions about the context in which it is pronounced. Interactions between: Linguistic knowledge and Encyclopedic knowledge
idea of context > key concept
There must be an interaction between the linguistic knowledge which is the knowledge of the meanings we should associate to science and the encyclopedic knowledge. It is a sort of contextualization knowledge that allows us to make deduction and to refer to a much reacher meaning. It is the implicit meaning we exchange while communicating. Beyond the linguistic moment there is a second level also known as the unspoken level of communication.
Every communicative act involves the interlocutors exchanging:
a literal meaning (or direct, literal purpose ): explicit content conveyed by the signals used (words, gestures, postures…) an indirect meaning (or implicit, overlying purpose) : implicit content that can be inferred from the literal meaning taking into account contextual knowledge.
ANALYSIS OF COMMUNICATIVE SITUATIONS Components of the communicative act can be studied by focusing on various points:
- Source and receiver
Steps:
COMMUNICATIVE SITUATIONS
conversation). This can be described as a very poor type of communication as most of the features are missing.
FUNCTIONS OF COMMUNICATION What are the basic functions of communication?
COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE = the ability to be effectively use communicative behaviors in a given context
It is defined as the ability to effectively use communicative behaviors in a given context. Context is very relevant. It is the result of the pragmatic approach. Communicating effectively means to regulate our behaviors and actions taking into account the context in which we are communicating.
Example: second debate in 2016 between Trump and Clinton
VIDEO 2020 campaign Trump and BIden
Summary of debates: Debate between Trump and Clinton: ● Non verbal elements: space taking, speaking with arms, crossing arms or legs, pointing gestures (point with fingers another person which denotes an aggressive style), smile...
Debate between Trump and Biden: ● The moderator is sitting down while the two politicians are up and also in a higher position. This is the reason why he did not manage to calm down both Trump and Biden. Moreover, Biden talks directly to the camera and therefore directly to American citizens. He also uses a lower tone of voice to connect on a more empathetic dimension. (Similarly Harris)
Also face is something which is very important → Picture of Putin
Non verbal communication is so important > to what extent does it matter?
different elements One of the most important research, Mehrabian one of the first to study it Line of research called→
Speech rarely occurs in isolation from non verbal cues. Non verbal communication was first studied in the 30s by Albert Mehrabian. He conducted several experiments where people were presented with some neutral sentences and he asked them to associate these sentences with some face. People relied on non verbal cues for the 55% of the whole communication. 38% Reid on voice and tone, and only 7% on spoken words. Only 7% were not biased by non-verbal features. The main aim was to quantify the amount of communication conveyed by non verbal features.
Non verbal communication is 7.5 times more powerful than verbal communication in the expression of interpersonal attitudes.
Some recent studies argue that while individuals express their opinions on candidates in twitter posts, they rely much more on candidates’ nonverbal behavior, rather than on their speeches.
to quantify the weight of non verbal communication> he presented people with some neutral sentences, and then asked to associate the sentences with some faces on the pictures (positive or negative emotions) then asked how the speaker was expressing himself Results: people relied on non verbal clues for the 55%; 38% the voice while only 7% referred to the verbal
Starting from this, he developed the idea that only the 7% of the communication can be extracted from the words, while the majority from the body language (most important)
Another psychologist Argyle> some researchers following this line (to quantify) to what extent the non verbal communication dimension counts. Some people were instructed to tell something about their experiences, in different ways. IN one condition used non verbal communication consistent with the tone (ex. some positive> use non verbal comm related such as smiling), In another condition asked to do it with an incongruent (opposite) Results: people relied much more on the non verbal when there was the ambiguity condition Non verbal communication is 7.5 times more powerful than verbal communication in the expression of interpersonal attitudes.
FUNCTIONS OF NVC
The interconnection of one code and another produces meaningful outcomes.
KINESICS - Facial expression → Face: the most important channel of nonverbal communication, defines a lot who we are. Anatomy of face→ some areas that can be broken down in some groups
March 17
Facial expressions are particularly important to express emotions > much research about how the face expresses emotions. The human face is used to communicate a variety of messages. Face is also the location of several different nerves. We have lots of muscles which produce different expressions. For instance, the zigomatic ones are important and they allow us to smile. It is a complex anatomic structure. One of the most important non verbal functions is the expression of the face.
Brain sciences > important in emotions, they are involved in the recognition of emotion and also in the production
Researchers focused their attention on specific expressions and they found out there is consistency among cultures. The expressions of some emotions are the same across cultures. Expressions can be distinguished into intentional and unintentional. Our brain activities work differently according to the type of expressions. Difference between intentional and unintentional expressions
There are some famous studies conducted by Elkann and Friesen in the 70s. They compared facial expressions of people coming from western countries and people coming from more isolated countries. These studies concluded that facial expressions conveyed by people in Guinea (they did not have contact with other societies) are the same of the ones from western countries. They then developed the neuro-cultural theory that assumes that there is an interaction between cultures and basic facial expressions. Some emotions and facial expressions of emotions are the same across cultures and they are also shaped by the culture individuals belong to.
Evolutionary origin of the expression of emotions →Facial expressions associated with basic emotions show high cross cultural recognition (see Darwin and Ekman studies)
Ekman > he studies nonverbal behavior and face expression
(Two famous coding systems of facial expressions:) Systems of description and coding of emotion expression:
Some basic movements of the face > combined together they can form all the ways we express emotion → This was a more simplified version
‣ First to provide a common definition and common names for facial movements
individuals. They are innate as they are the same. Furthermore, he argues that each emotion can be conceived as a family where we can find different nuances that correspond to the verbal labels we used to define emotions (we have different graduation of the same emotions and therefore they have to be considered as families).
◦For example > emotions common to all humans, and innate in babies ◦These should be considered “families” of emotions
FACE SIGNALS (Ekman, 1982)
Static signals → are permanent facial signals such as our bone structure and face color. They are stable for a long period of time. They usually do not directly convey emotions but they provide a sort of canvas where emotions are expressed.
Slow/slo changing signals → clues that gradually change over time; wrinkles, skin textures, shape of the face and so on > this does not show the emotions, but can affect the overall person's facial expression.
Rapid signals → the ones studied by Erkman, these express emotions. There are some muscles which produce very quick changes on our face and these rapid movements involve all the facial movements people make while expressing emotions. Many facial cues of emotions are dynamic and change very quickly. They can be divided into:
Micro-expressions study: the patient was a 40 years old woman (hospitalized for depression) who tried to kill herself more than twice before being hospitalized. Doctors during the sessions claimed she was no longer depressed and she was feeling better. She used to
smile a lot and be enthusiastic. Fortunately, before leaving the hospital she confessed she was lying. Elkann decided to analyze the video recording and he noticed some expressions of deep sadness on her face. In the recordings they noticed some very very quick expressions of deep desperation and deep sadness > they lasted less than a second. These reveal feelings of people because these are little moments in which we express our real emotions (tells whether a person is being honest). These expressions were very rapid and were visible only in slow motion. He argues that patient faces often showed a number of rapidly changing emotions.
Kato Kaelin argues that micro-expressions occur when people try to hide the real emotions they are feeling. They also occur when someone is totally unaware of what he/she is feeling. Micro-expressions are the result of either conscious suppression (intentional) or unconscious repression (unintentional). They look exactly the same. Usually, the context in which they occur will make clear if it is either generated by repression or suppression.
KINESICS - FACIAL EXPRESSION Deception detection (tell if we were lying) The line of research starting from micro-expressions has also brought to identifying some signs/ signals about deception.
Elkann proposed some possible signs of the deception beside micro-expressions:
Display rules Another kind of classification of Ekman > when analyzing deception detection he said that this happens not only when we lie, but also when we adapt out behavior to the situation.