

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Reading response #1 for book using Article Annotation Analysis Organizer
Typology: Summaries
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


Article Annotation Analysis Organizer Thesis Statement: Edward L. Ayers contends that the Civil War was more than a war of armies but something that remade the everyday life of ordinary people. By a close reading of Augusta County, Virginia, and Franklin County, Pennsylvania, he shows how slavery, politics, and loyalty affected families and communities in intensely personal ways Supporting Evidence/Main Idea 1: Ayers begins by comparing Franklin and Augusta to show how different life looked on either side of the Mason–Dixon Line. Augusta's agriculture was dependent nearly entirely on slave labor, which tied its white residents to the defense of slavery as a part of civic identity. Franklin was established on free labor and the developing market economy, where people viewed slavery as immoral and economically reactionary. These conflicting foundations do an excellent job of explaining why every county entered the war with such conflicting opinions and drives (Ayers, pgs. 25–28). Supporting Evidence/Main Idea 2: He also points out that loyalty was frequently complicated. In Augusta, white citizens overall supported secession and the Confederacy, but some were worried about how war would affect their farms, their trade, and their families. In Franklin, Union loyalty
wasn't universal either. Although Lincoln had some staunch supporters, others especially Democrats who censured him for government intrusion and asked if the war was even necessary (Ayers, pgs. 40–43). This shows how those from both sides wrestled with political and ethical questions, rather than mindlessly following leaders. Supporting Evidence/Main Idea 3: Finally, Ayers points out how quickly the war seeped into everyday life. In Augusta, Union invasions upset agriculture, supplies became short, and slaves clamored for freedom by escaping to Union lines. These incidents unsettled the very foundation of Southern homes. In Franklin, civilians had a constant fear of Confederate raids and witnessed their economy turned upside down as factories and farms converted to support the war effort. This convergence of battlefront and home front made the war inevitable, no matter which side of the line one was on (Ayers, pgs. 55–59). Questions: