Article Review Template | PDF Format, Lecture notes of Logic

For a good article review, every student need help. Here is an article review template, get help from it and write a great review in no time.

Typology: Lecture notes

2021/2022

Uploaded on 09/12/2022

mangaxxx
mangaxxx 🇬🇧

4.7

(10)

218 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Format
fo
r
Review
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
Outline
of the
Article
R
e
v
i
e
w
Please include the following categories in your article
review:
1. Full Bibliographic
Reference
2. Introduction: Objectives, Article Domain, Audience, Journal and Conceptual/
Empirical
Classificatin
3. Brief
Summary
4.
Results
5.
Contributions
6.
Foundation
7. Synthesis with
Concepts
8. Analysis and Additional
Analysis
9. General
Critique
10. Further Critique of a Conceptual Article/ an Empirical
Article
11. Issues (as listed by the
author)
12. Issues (as per your
opinion)
13.
Relevance/Impact
14.
Questions
15. Annotated
Bibliography
1. Full
Bibliographic
R
efe
r
en
c
e
State the full bibliographic reference of the article you are reviewing (authors, title,
journal
name,
volume, issue, year, page numbers,
etc)
2.
Introduction: Objectives, Article domain, Audience, Journal
and
C
on
c
eptu
a
l
/
Empirical/Review
C
l
a
ss
i
f
i
c
a
t
i
on
- State the Objective of the Article (goals or purpose), its domain/ topic
area.
-Identify the intended audience of the article, i.e. what background should reader
have;
what
background material one should be familiar to understand the
article?
- Is the journal appropriate (or inappropriate) for this
article?
- Classify whether the article is Conceptual or Empirical or
Review
3. Brief
S
umm
a
r
y
Summarize the article very briefly, roughly as
under:
Paragraph 1: What is the problem being
addressed?
Paragraph 2: which solution is being
proposed?
Article Review Template
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Article Review Template | PDF Format and more Lecture notes Logic in PDF only on Docsity!

Format fo rReview A rt i c l e

Outline of the Article Rev i ew

Please include the following categories in your article review:

  1. Full Bibliographic Reference
  2. Introduction: Objectives, Article Domain, Audience, Journal and Conceptual/ Empirical Classificatin
  3. Brief Summary
  4. Results
  5. Contributions
  6. Foundation
  7. Synthesis with Concepts
  8. Analysis and Additional Analysis
  9. General Critique
  10. Further Critique of a Conceptual Article/ an Empirical Article
  11. Issues (as listed by the author)
  12. Issues (as per your opinion)
  13. Relevance/Impact
  14. Questions
  15. Annotated Bibliography
  16. Full Bibliographic R efer ence State the full bibliographic reference of the article you are reviewing (authors, title, journal name, volume, issue, year, page numbers, etc)
  17. Introduction: Objectives, Article domain, Audience, Journal and Conceptua l/ Empirical/Review Cla ssi fi cation
  • State the Objective of the Article (goals or purpose), its domain/ topic area.

-Identify the intended audience of the article, i.e. what background should reader have; what background material one should be familiar to understand the article?

  • Is the journal appropriate (or inappropriate) for this article?
  • Classify whether the article is Conceptual or Empirical or Review
  1. Brief S umma r y Summarize the article very briefly, roughly as

under: Paragraph 1: What is the problem being

addressed? Paragraph 2: which solution is being

proposed?

Article Review Template

Paragraph 3: what evidence is put forward to support the solution provided (if article is of empirical type, highlight what kind of empirical study was conducted as part of the evidence)

  1. R e s ul ts Briefly summarize the important points (such as observations, conclusions, findings, inferences) and “take home points” in the article.
  2. Contribution s An article makes a contribution by adding to the knowledge of researchers in a research field. An article can make a contribution to research field in many ways. Does it provide a new way to look at a problem? Does it bring together or “synthesize” several concepts in an insightful way that has not been done before? Does it provide new results/ solutions or identify new issues? Are the issues addressed introduced in a way that their relevance/impact to practice is evident?

List the article’s original contribution. Discuss each contribution with due care.

  1. F ounda tion Identify the key pieces of prior research upon which article are built. If the article is entirely new domain, “This article does not build upon any foundation research” may be specified.
  2. Synthesis with Conc epts Synthesis means analysing a particular topic by comparing and contrasting it with, and thinking about it from the viewpoint of, the basic concepts related to the topic.
  3. An alys i s State that what has changed since the article was written? How do its lessons, ideas and theories still apply? To what extent has its issues been resolved?
  4. General Cri tique In this section one should state his/her opinions of how well the authors presented and discussed the research results including interpretations in the article. It should contain both positive and negative comments with due justification.

Following issues may be addressed:

  • Does it build upon the appropriate foundation (i.e., upon appropriate prior research)?
  • Is the approach and execution is correct?
  • Confidence with respect to the article’s results, and why?
  • Does article throws upon exclusive new ideas?
  • What are the article’s shortcomings and limitations?
  • Are all important aspects and issues of its domain covered?
  • Examine and comment the logic given in the article

10a. Further Critiques of a Conceptual A rti cle

Article shall be test upon clarity, theoretical grounding, design of hypotheses and research investigation, correctness (in measurements, analysis and inferences drawn).

10c. Further criticises of a Review Article

The logical sequence of background information and the focus as the state-of the art research should be examined.

Article should be checked upon clarity, theoretical background, latest literature & critical review, scope for further research in the related area.

  1. Issues (as listed by a utho r ) State issues as listed by author. How they are addressed or not addressed?
  2. Issues (as per your opi ni on ) State issues according to you which remain unresolved or issues which could arise in future. Also, provide suggestions for resolving them.
  3. R ele vance /Impa ct Determine how much this article has relevance/Impact, do a citation analysis.
  4. Ques tions List three insightful questions of your own arising from this article that could really make one think.
  5. Annotated Bib lio graph y For every item you have cited in your review, you need a full reference and an annotation explaining it, as under:
  6. List the full bibliographic references
  7. Write 2-4 sentences describing the article.
  8. Write 2-4 sentences describing why you cited it.