




Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
A step-by-step guide for conducting a series of biochemical tests to identify the bacterium responsible for a rare infection in reptiles and amphibians. The tests include acid from glucose, gas from glucose, lysine decarboxylase, malonate utilization, salicin fermentation, sorbital fermentation, growth in kcn, and dulcitol fermentation. The goal is to identify the bacterium and understand its characteristics for epidemiological purposes.
Typology: Study notes
1 / 8
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!





BIOS 242 Week 7 iLab: EPIDEMIOLOGY EPIDEMIOLOGY Introduction I conducted a series of biochemical tests to identify the bacterium responsible for the situation presented in the case study. This week’s case study illustrates a situation that an epidemiologist might need to solve. A rare expensive monitor lizard dies and the following day a Gila monster and rare Tibetan Newt died as well. A bacteriological survey of the reptiles and amphibians was obtained with the end result being salmonella bongori with gram negative rods. Procedure You will conduct four biochemical tests (Acid from Glucose, Gas from Glucose, Lysine decarboxylase, Malonate Utilization, Salicin fermentation, Sorbital fermentation, Growth in KCN, and Dulcitol fermentation) on your unknown bacterium sample. You may have noted that you have conducted several of these tests in previous weeks. Conduct Acid from Glucose and Gas from Glucose Tests:
Conduct Sorbitol Fermentation Test :
View Lab Report Results:
DNase at 25C Neg NO Change Hydrogen Sulfide Neg Color Change Bacterium identified as: Salmonella Bongori with gram negative rods Discussion Identify the bacterium: Salmonella Bongori with gram negative rods Is this infection local, systemic, subclinical, or focal? What evidence supports your selection? This type of infection is a subclinical infection because the animals in this case study carried it on the surface of their skin and it was transmitted to their foods and ingested by human hands, and transmitted from one animal to the other by means of manual transmission or potentially by means of raw foods. Is this a primary infection, secondary infection, or nosocomial infection? Why? This infection is a nosocomial infection; it is the multiplication of microorganisms in the body. The hosts in this case could carry it on their skin and it can be transmitted from one animal to another through the food while they’re being fed.
What was the reservoir for this microbe? The reservoirs are body tissue, wastes, contaminated food and water as well as animals and insects. Would this be classified as a communicable, a contagious, or a noncommunicable disease? Why? Yes, this would be a communicable disease because it is spread through the food and water. In which disease category would this disease fall: acute, chronic, subacute, or latent? Why? – I would classify it as subacute because the symptoms of the disease were prolonged in the body but wasn’t chronic. Conclusion After conducting the lab experiment and observing the collected data, the conclusion was that the animals had salmonella from contaminated food that they had eaten from their handlers. This bacteria is subacute, meaning it is not chronic and can be avoided by washing hands thoroughly which helps prevent the spread amongst the food we handle.