Case analysis module chemical A or B, college study notes - Engineering ethics.pdp, Study notes of Engineering Chemistry

Study Material. This module is founded on two insights: the analogy between problem-solving in ethics and design methodology and the eectiveness of case analysis for practicing skills in ethical problem-solving. Stu- dents will practice using a four-stage decision-making framework developed on analogy from the software development cycle. They will also learn socio-technical system analysis and how to use this to formulate and solve ethical problems that arise in everyday engineering practice. C

Typology: Study notes

2011/2012

Uploaded on 10/12/2012

hollyb
hollyb 🇺🇸

4.8

(44)

431 documents

1 / 4

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Connexions module: m13789 1
Case Analysis Module: Chemical A
or B?
William Frey
This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution License
Abstract
This module is founded on two insights: the analogy between problem-solving in ethics and design
methodology and the eectiveness of case analysis for practicing skills in ethical problem-solving. Stu-
dents will practice using a four-stage decision-making framework developed on analogy from the software
development cycle. They will also learn socio-technical system analysis and how to use this to formulate
and solve ethical problems that arise in everyday engineering practice. This module has been developed
to test the capacity of the EAC Toolkit to add value to engineering ethics modules and to draw together
interdisciplinary teams in designing and modifying EAC modules. This module is being developed as a
part of an NSF-funded project, "Collaborative Development of Ethics Across the Curriculum Resources
and Sharing of Best Practices," NSF SES 0551779.
Case Analysis Module for Engineering Ethics
Chemical A or B?
By William J. Frey
Module Introduction:
This module consists of three components designed to provide you with an opportunity to practice
decision-making in real world situations. The rst component, the case presented below, Chemical A or B?,
actually happened although the particulars have been altered to protect the condentiality of those involved.
It provides you with a decision point. You must take on the role of one of the cases participants and make
a decision from the standpoint of that participant.
Following the case is a four stage process designed to help you make a rigorous ethical decision. First, you
will specify the problem by specifying the underlying socio-technical system and identifying its conicting
embedded moral and non-moral values. Second, you will brainstorm solutions to this problem in a solution
generation stage. Third, you will evaluate each solution alternative using ethics tests and a global feasibility
analysis. Finally, you will use a detailed feasibility test to identify underlying resource, interest, and technical
constraints. This will provide guidance for developing a plan for implementing your solution.
Introduction
You are a chemical engineering student has been working with a local manufacturing rm as a part
of your university's co-op program. For several years the rm has been using chemical A as a catalyst in
their manufacturing process. Chemical A is carcinogenic, although studies supporting this claim have only
recently been published. Without taking elaborate safety precautions, workers handling chemical A would
be exposed to sucient amounts to risk developing cancer. The signicance of this risk is covered over
by the fact that the disease takes up to 20 years to manifest itself. The company has tried to implement
Version 1.2: Mar 2, 2007 8:39 am US/Central
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
http://cnx.org/content/m13789/1.2/
pf3
pf4

Partial preview of the text

Download Case analysis module chemical A or B, college study notes - Engineering ethics.pdp and more Study notes Engineering Chemistry in PDF only on Docsity!

Case Analysis Module: Chemical A

or B?

William Frey

This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License †

Abstract This module is founded on two insights: the analogy between problem-solving in ethics and design methodology and the eectiveness of case analysis for practicing skills in ethical problem-solving. Stu- dents will practice using a four-stage decision-making framework developed on analogy from the software development cycle. They will also learn socio-technical system analysis and how to use this to formulate and solve ethical problems that arise in everyday engineering practice. This module has been developed to test the capacity of the EAC Toolkit to add value to engineering ethics modules and to draw together interdisciplinary teams in designing and modifying EAC modules. This module is being developed as a part of an NSF-funded project, "Collaborative Development of Ethics Across the Curriculum Resources and Sharing of Best Practices," NSF SES 0551779. Case Analysis Module for Engineering Ethics Chemical A or B? By William J. Frey Module Introduction: This module consists of three components designed to provide you with an opportunity to practice decision-making in real world situations. The rst component, the case presented below, Chemical A or B?, actually happened although the particulars have been altered to protect the condentiality of those involved. It provides you with a decision point. You must take on the role of one of the cases participants and make a decision from the standpoint of that participant. Following the case is a four stage process designed to help you make a rigorous ethical decision. First, you will specify the problem by specifying the underlying socio-technical system and identifying its conicting embedded moral and non-moral values. Second, you will brainstorm solutions to this problem in a solution generation stage. Third, you will evaluate each solution alternative using ethics tests and a global feasibility analysis. Finally, you will use a detailed feasibility test to identify underlying resource, interest, and technical constraints. This will provide guidance for developing a plan for implementing your solution. Introduction You are a chemical engineering student has been working with a local manufacturing rm as a part of your university's co-op program. For several years the rm has been using chemical A as a catalyst in their manufacturing process. Chemical A is carcinogenic, although studies supporting this claim have only recently been published. Without taking elaborate safety precautions, workers handling chemical A would be exposed to sucient amounts to risk developing cancer. The signicance of this risk is covered over by the fact that the disease takes up to 20 years to manifest itself. The company has tried to implement

∗Version 1.2: Mar 2, 2007 8:39 am US/Central †http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

safety procedures and controls, but workers routinely ignore them. The safety procedures slow down the manufacturing process, and the workers frequently cut corners to meet quotas. You know of another chemical, B, which also serves as a catalyst in this manufacturing process but is not carcinogenic. Nevertheless, chemical B is considerably more expensive.

Decision Situation: A meeting has been called to rene and possibly reengineer the company's manufacturing process. Along with you are four other group members: a senior engineer, a manager, an industrial engineer who supervises the manufacturing process, and a marketing specialist. To repeat, you are the co-op student. Should you suggest changing to catalyst B at this meeting? If so, how should you present your case?

Decision Point You decide to bring the issue up at the meeting. You cite the recently discovered dangers of chemical A and the tendency of the workers to violate safety procedures in using it. Then you present the preliminary research on chemical B: although B is more expensive than A, it is much safer and is as eective a catalyst as A in the manufacturing process. When you nish, your argument meets with sti resistance, especially from the manager present at the meeting. He tells you that your job is to make suggestions for streamlining the existing manufacturing process, not to design a new one. Furthermore, he argues, if there were a problem with safety he would have heard about it by now from the Human Resources or Legal Aairs departments. The two engineers present at the meeting say very little; they are intimidated by the manager and apparently intend to follow his lead. The manager asks the them if using chemical A violates OSHA regulations; they reply that to the best of their knowledge, it does not. The manager concludes by deciding that the company will continue to use chemical A.

You are the co-op student. What should you do?

  1. Identify key components of the STS

Part/Level of Analy- sis

Hardware Software Physical Surround- ings

People, Groups, & Roles

Procedures Laws & Regula- tions

Data & Data Structures

Table 1

  1. Specify the problem: 2a. Is the problem a disagreement on facts? What are the facts? What are cost and time constraints on uncovering and communicating these facts? 2b. Is the problem a disagreement on a critical concept? What is the concept? Can agreement be reached by consulting legal or regulatory information on the concept? (For example, if the concept in question is safety, can disputants consult engineering codes, legal precedents, or ethical literature that helps provide consensus? Can disputants agree on positive and negative paradigm cases so the concept disagreement can be resolved through line-drawing methods? 2c. Use the table to identify and locate value conicts within the STS. Can the problem be specied as a mismatch between a technology and the existing STS, a mismatch within the STS exacerbated by the introduction of the technology, or by overlooked results?

Time Cost Individual Organization Legal/ So- cial

Available Techno- logy

Manufacturability

Table 5