


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Study Material. This module is founded on two insights: the analogy between problem-solving in ethics and design methodology and the eectiveness of case analysis for practicing skills in ethical problem-solving. Stu- dents will practice using a four-stage decision-making framework developed on analogy from the software development cycle. They will also learn socio-technical system analysis and how to use this to formulate and solve ethical problems that arise in everyday engineering practice. C
Typology: Study notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



This work is produced by The Connexions Project and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License †
Abstract This module is founded on two insights: the analogy between problem-solving in ethics and design methodology and the eectiveness of case analysis for practicing skills in ethical problem-solving. Stu- dents will practice using a four-stage decision-making framework developed on analogy from the software development cycle. They will also learn socio-technical system analysis and how to use this to formulate and solve ethical problems that arise in everyday engineering practice. This module has been developed to test the capacity of the EAC Toolkit to add value to engineering ethics modules and to draw together interdisciplinary teams in designing and modifying EAC modules. This module is being developed as a part of an NSF-funded project, "Collaborative Development of Ethics Across the Curriculum Resources and Sharing of Best Practices," NSF SES 0551779. Case Analysis Module for Engineering Ethics Chemical A or B? By William J. Frey Module Introduction: This module consists of three components designed to provide you with an opportunity to practice decision-making in real world situations. The rst component, the case presented below, Chemical A or B?, actually happened although the particulars have been altered to protect the condentiality of those involved. It provides you with a decision point. You must take on the role of one of the cases participants and make a decision from the standpoint of that participant. Following the case is a four stage process designed to help you make a rigorous ethical decision. First, you will specify the problem by specifying the underlying socio-technical system and identifying its conicting embedded moral and non-moral values. Second, you will brainstorm solutions to this problem in a solution generation stage. Third, you will evaluate each solution alternative using ethics tests and a global feasibility analysis. Finally, you will use a detailed feasibility test to identify underlying resource, interest, and technical constraints. This will provide guidance for developing a plan for implementing your solution. Introduction You are a chemical engineering student has been working with a local manufacturing rm as a part of your university's co-op program. For several years the rm has been using chemical A as a catalyst in their manufacturing process. Chemical A is carcinogenic, although studies supporting this claim have only recently been published. Without taking elaborate safety precautions, workers handling chemical A would be exposed to sucient amounts to risk developing cancer. The signicance of this risk is covered over by the fact that the disease takes up to 20 years to manifest itself. The company has tried to implement
∗Version 1.2: Mar 2, 2007 8:39 am US/Central †http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
safety procedures and controls, but workers routinely ignore them. The safety procedures slow down the manufacturing process, and the workers frequently cut corners to meet quotas. You know of another chemical, B, which also serves as a catalyst in this manufacturing process but is not carcinogenic. Nevertheless, chemical B is considerably more expensive.
Decision Situation: A meeting has been called to rene and possibly reengineer the company's manufacturing process. Along with you are four other group members: a senior engineer, a manager, an industrial engineer who supervises the manufacturing process, and a marketing specialist. To repeat, you are the co-op student. Should you suggest changing to catalyst B at this meeting? If so, how should you present your case?
Decision Point You decide to bring the issue up at the meeting. You cite the recently discovered dangers of chemical A and the tendency of the workers to violate safety procedures in using it. Then you present the preliminary research on chemical B: although B is more expensive than A, it is much safer and is as eective a catalyst as A in the manufacturing process. When you nish, your argument meets with sti resistance, especially from the manager present at the meeting. He tells you that your job is to make suggestions for streamlining the existing manufacturing process, not to design a new one. Furthermore, he argues, if there were a problem with safety he would have heard about it by now from the Human Resources or Legal Aairs departments. The two engineers present at the meeting say very little; they are intimidated by the manager and apparently intend to follow his lead. The manager asks the them if using chemical A violates OSHA regulations; they reply that to the best of their knowledge, it does not. The manager concludes by deciding that the company will continue to use chemical A.
You are the co-op student. What should you do?
Part/Level of Analy- sis
Hardware Software Physical Surround- ings
People, Groups, & Roles
Procedures Laws & Regula- tions
Data & Data Structures
Table 1
Time Cost Individual Organization Legal/ So- cial
Available Techno- logy
Manufacturability
Table 5