

Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Solutions to assignment 4 of chem 20a, winter 2001, covering topics such as interference conditions in the 2-slit experiment, energy calculations for electrons and neutrons, and energy level analysis for hydrogen, helium, and lithium atoms. It also discusses the limitations of the shielding model used for estimating ionization energies.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 3
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!


CHEM 20A. Winter 2001 Assignment 4. SOLUTIONS.
9.1.a) If the wave length is much longer than the object, it is like having the wave length (λ) much longer than the separation between slits (d). For the 2-slit experiment, nλ = dsinθ, where θ is the angle at which the beam is measured (scattering angle). The first diffraction maximum comes at n = 1, so if d/λ < 1, it is impossible to satisfy the interference condition. Why? On the other hand if λ is too small, d/λ >> 1, then the first interference maximum comes at such a small angle that it cannot be detected (it is unresolved). Why? b) E = (1/2)mv^2 = (1/2)(mv)^2 /m = (1/2m)(h/λ)^2 = (1/2)(1/9x10-31kg)(6.6x10-34J s/10-10m)^2 (1/1.6x10-19^ J eV-1) = 1.4x10^2 eV c) Same as above but mass is 1800 times larger. Since the energy above varied as m-1, the energy of the neutron is 1800 times less than than for the electrons. E = (1.4x10^2 /1.8x10^3 )eV = 0.08 eV.
9.2. This is done in many texts. You may come see DK about it if your are interested.
9.3. a). This is done in many texts. You may come see DK about it if you are interested. b) .This is done in many texts. You may come see DK about it if you are interested. c) If d is the distance between planes, and a bright spot is observed at an angle θ, then the distance between planes can be determined by the formula, d = (λl/2sinθ). d) See problem 9.1.
10.2. We ask first what constants can possibly enter the problem? Since it is a quantum mechanical problem it must contain Planck's constant, h. The kinetic energy must depend upon the electron mass, m. The potential energy must depend upon (Ze^2 /4πεo). Why? There are no other constant that can enter this problem. Why? If there is a length it must depend upon the constants above. Why? Let us call the length, az. Thus az = a function of the three constants above. Furthermore, the dimensions on the left of this equation are length (L) and so the dimensions on the right must be length (L). So aZ is proportional to (m)b(h)c(Ze^2 /4πεo)d where b,c, and d are dimensionless numbers that we wish to determine. The dimensions of mass are clearly mass {M}}. The dimensions of h can readily be determined since hν = energy = {ML^2 T-2} where {T} is time. Since the dimensions of ν are {T-1}, it follows that the dimensions of h are {ML^2 T-1}. The dimensions of (Ze^2 /4πεo) can readily determined since (Ze^2 /4πεo) divided by a length is an energy. (Coulomb's law). Thus (Ze^2 /4πεo) is an energy times a length, i.e. , {ML^2 T-2L} = {ML^3 T-2} Rewriting the equation just in terms of dimensions we have {L} = {M}b{ML^2 T-1}c{ML^3 T-2}d
For this to be so, note the powers of each dimension must be the same on both sides: for M: 0 = b+c+d for T: 0 = -c-2d for L: 1 = 2c+3d. Three equation in three unknowns. I leave it up to you. Since this is the only characteristic length that can appear in the problem (no other one can be formed from these quantities) it must be a fundamental length scale for the problem.
11.1* For H the energy levels are given by -RHn-2^ where n = 1,2,3,... For He+^ the levels are given by -(2)^2 RHn-2^ where n = 1,2,3,..... For Li2+^ the levels are given by -(3)^2 RHn-2^ where n = 1,2,3,..... These are the ionization energies.
For He we can only estimate. The two 1s electrons are in the same orbital and so they shield each other only partially, say about 0.5. Thus the effective charge on each of them is about 2 - 0.5 = 1.5. And this means the ground state energy is about -(1.5)^2 RH(1)-2^ for each electron, i.e ., 4.5RH for the two of them. If one electron is removed, the remaining electron is subject to the full nuclear charge of Z = 2, and it has energy -(2)^2 RH(1)-2. Thus the ionization energy is about 4.25 RH - 4 RH = 0.25 RH Actually it should be closer to 2RH, which means that our shielding model is not sufficiently good to estimate the ionization energy of He. The trouble is that the effective charge for the 1s electrons in the ground state is about 1.7e rather than 1.5e. When squared this yields about 2.9 rather than 2.25, which gives a ground state of about 5.8RH rather than 4.25RH. This raises the ionization energy to about 1.8RH which is quite close to the actual value. I have gone through the arguments for you - now it is your turn to make sense of it.
For Li, the outer 2s electron is quite well shielded by the two inner 1s electrons so the effective Z ≈ 1. Thus the orbital energy for the outer electron is about -(1)^2 RH(2)-2. When ionized this electron's contribution to the atomic energy is 0. Thus the ionization energy is about RH/4. Of course, this assumes that the two inner 1s electrons completely shield the 2s electron (which is not exactly the case), i.e., the ionization energy should be slightly higher. But furthermore, it assumes that the shielding of the 1s electrons by the 2s electrons was completely negligible; this, too, is not exactly the case. So in sum the actual ionization energy is higher than estimated by our very oversimplified model.
b) Our simple shielding model states that the 2s electron has no effect on the 1s electrons, and that the 1s electrons are perfect shielders of the 2s electrons; thus the effective Z for the 2s electron is about (3-2) = 1, and the estimated ionization energy is the about RH/4. The second electron to be removed is a 1s electron which is only partially shielded from the nucleus so that its effective Z ≈ (3-.5) ⋅≈ 2.5, and the ionization energy is about (2.5)^2 RH=6.25RH. Actually we might expect the effective Z for the remaining 1s electron (once it loses the shielding of the removed 1s electron) to be the full Z = 3 instead of 2.5, which accounts for an energy drop of about (3)^2 RH-(2.5)^2 RH = 2.75RH.