Cognitive Theory and Philosophical Foundations: A Historical Overview, Exercises of Cognitive Psychology

A historical overview of cognitive theory and its philosophical foundations. It explores the development of cognitive theory from ancient philosophy to modern times, covering key concepts, influential theorists, and their contributions. Topics include Plato's idealism, Wilhelm Wundt, William James, John Dewey, Max Wertheimer, Wolfgang Kohler, Kurt Koffka, Gestalt theory, cognitive mapping, Kurt Lewin, Frederic C. Bartlett, Jean Piaget, Jerome S. Bruner, and Noam Chomsky.

Typology: Exercises

2021/2022

Uploaded on 07/05/2022

lee_95
lee_95 🇦🇺

4.6

(59)

999 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 372 324 CG 025 617
AUTHOR Grider, Clint
TITLE Foundations of Cognitive Theory: A Concise Review.
PUB DATE [93)
NOTE 15p.
PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070)
EDRS PRICE MF01/PC(1. Plus Postage.
DESCRIPTORS *Cognitive Psychology; *Epistemology; HerMeneutics;
Learning; Piagetian Theory
IDENTIFIERS Chomsky (Noam); *Cognitive Models; Cognitive
Research; Gestalt Psychology; Lewin (Kurt); Piaget
(Jean)
ABSTRACT
Cognitive-learning theories hold a unique place in
history: they explore the depths of the mind from the perspective of
process. This paper discusses the history of cognitive-learning
theories and how they grew to shape the way one perceives, organizes,
stores, and retrieves information. The paper, after providing a
definition and synopsis of cognitive theory and its basic concepts,
turns to the theories' philosophical foundations, beginning with
Plato. The psychological foundations of the functions of the mind,
and the pioneering efforts of the structuralists and Wilhelm Wundt
are discussed. As psychology matured, practitioners like William
James and John Dewey rejected structuralism, believing it to be too
narrow to understand the mind. The mind's mechinisms then underwent
numerous, pivotal shifts in interpretation moving from the Gestalt
viewpoint and its variations, like those introduced by Edward Tolman,
to the role of motivation in learning as expounded by Kurt Lewin, to
Frederic C. Bartlett's concept of schemata, to Jean Piaget's
explications of cognitive growth and development, and finally, to the
refinement of Piaget's theory by Jerome S. Bruner. The paper
concludes with a brief description of the contributions made by other
disciplines to cognitive understandings such as those advances made
by the linguist Noam Chomsky, and the powerful impact of the computer
on cognitive psychology. (RJM)
*******,..----****).*************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the beet that can be made
from the original document.
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Cognitive Theory and Philosophical Foundations: A Historical Overview and more Exercises Cognitive Psychology in PDF only on Docsity!

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 372 324 CG 025 617

AUTHOR (^) Grider, Clint

TITLE Foundations of Cognitive Theory: A Concise Review.

PUB DATE (^) [93)

NOTE (^) 15p.

PUB TYPE (^) Information Analyses (070)

EDRS PRICE (^) MF01/PC(1. Plus Postage.

DESCRIPTORS *Cognitive Psychology; *Epistemology; HerMeneutics;

Learning; Piagetian Theory

IDENTIFIERS Chomsky (Noam); *Cognitive Models; Cognitive

Research; Gestalt Psychology; Lewin (Kurt); Piaget

(Jean)

ABSTRACT

Cognitive-learning theories hold a unique place in

history: they explore the depths of the mind from the perspective of

process. This paper discusses the history of cognitive-learning

theories and how they grew to shape the way one perceives, organizes,

stores, and retrieves information. The paper, after providing a

definition and synopsis of cognitive theory and its basic concepts,

turns to the theories' philosophical foundations, beginning with

Plato. The psychological foundations of the functions of the mind,

and the pioneering efforts of the structuralists and Wilhelm Wundt

are discussed. As psychology matured, practitioners like William

James and John Dewey rejected structuralism, believing it to be too

narrow to understand the mind. The mind's mechinisms then underwent

numerous, pivotal shifts in interpretation moving from the Gestalt

viewpoint and its variations, like those introduced by Edward Tolman,

to the role of motivation in learning as expounded by Kurt Lewin, to

Frederic C. Bartlett's concept of schemata, to Jean Piaget's

explications of cognitive growth and development, and finally, to the

refinement of Piaget's theory by Jerome S. Bruner. The paper

concludes with a brief description of the contributions madeby other

disciplines to cognitive understandings suchas those advances made

by the linguist Noam Chomsky, and the powerful impact of the computer

on cognitive psychology. (RJM)

*******,..----****).*************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the beet that can be made

from the original document.

FoundationsofCognitiveTheory:AConciseReview

Clint Grider

Howdowelearn?Withinpsychologicalthought,cognitivelearningtheorieshave,perhaps,

encompassedthebroadestarrayofmethodologies.Fromphilosophicalrootstoevolving

constructsandproponents,cognitivestrategiesprovideadivergentyetdistinctemphasisonthe

mentalprocessesthatenableindividualstolearnandtouseknowledge.

DefiningTheory

Definition

Thedominantaspectsofcognitivetheoryinvolvetheinteractionbetweenmentalcomponents

andtheinformationthatisprocessedthroughthiscomplexnetwork(Neisser,1967).As

individualslearn,theyactivelycreatecognitivestructureswhichdeterminetheirconceptsofself

andtheenvironment(McEntire,1992).Interestingly,thespecificprocessoflearningisnotthe

primaryareaofconcernincognitiveresearch;instead,learningisviewedasonlyoneofthemany

processescomprisedbythehumanmind(Anderson,1980).Althoughallcognitivetheorists

examinethesefunctionstodiscovermoreabouthumanlearningandbehavior,theyoftendiffer

regardingemphasis.Someapproachesdealwithdetailedanalysesofinformation-processing

skills,whileothersfocusonmentalmodelsorcognitivegrowthanddevelopment(Mayer,1981).

Thus,cognitivepsychologistsdonotadheretoaparticularsetofrulesormethodologiesintheir

research.

BasicConcepts

Cognitivetheoristsbelievethatlearninginvolvestheintegrationofeventsintoanactive

storagesystemcomprisedoforganizationalstructurestermedschemata(Baron&Byrne,1987).

Schemataserveanumberoffunctionsinhumancognition.Inadditiontostoringinformationin

long-termmemory,theyformulateframeworksintowhichnewinformationmustfitinordertobe

understood.Furthermore,schemataregulateattention,organizesearchesoftheenvironment,and

-PERMISSIONTOREPRODUCETHIS U.S.DEPARTMENTOFEDUCATION

CO MATERIALHASBEENGRANTEDBY

OfficeofEducationalResearchandImprovement

EDUCATIONALRESOURCESINFORMATION

  • (^) eider

CENTER(ERIC)

0Thisdocumenthasbeenreproducedas

receivedfromthepersonororganization

C:

originatingit

C)Minorchangeshavebeenmadetoimprove

reproductionquality

(-) BESTCOPYAVAILABLE

TOTHEEDUCATIONALRESOURCES 2

Pointsofviewoopinionsstatedinthisdocu.

mentdonotnecessarilyrepresentofficial

INFORMATIONCENTER(ERIC)." (^) OERIpositionorpohcy

Meaningfullearningoccurswhenknowledgestoredinlong-termmemoryisshiftedtoshort-

termmemorytointegratenewinformationintothemind(Bell-Gredler,1986).Themostimportant

cognitiveassociationsoccurwhenindividualsrelatestoredknowledgetosensoryinputand

consequentlyencodethestimuliintolong-termmemory(i.e.,newschemata)(Bell-Gredler,1986);

therefore,cognitivelearningemphasizestheinternalmental processesofassociation.Thisconcept

differsfromthebehavioralviewofassociationwhichisbaseduponexternalmotivation.AsBell-

Gredlerstates,"successfullearningdependsonthelearner'sactionsratherthanoneventsinthe

environment"(1986,p.171).

TracingFoundations

PhilosophicalFoundations

Therootsofcognitivetheorycanbetracedtosystemsofancientphilosophythatdateasfar

backas400B.C.Plato'sidealismisbasedonthepremisethatrealityonlyconsists ofspiritand

mind.AccordingtoPlato,theuniverseiscomprisedofgoodandperfect absolutesthatareorderly

andeternal.One'sspiritualessence,orsoul,isalsodurableand permanent.Valuesreflectthe

inherentgoodintheuniverse,andethicalconductgrowsoutofone'smoraleducation.Idealism

holdsthatallknowledgeisinnate;thus,introspectionistheonlymethodofdiscoveringtruth.

Platobelievedthatoneshouldconstantlyexercisethemindbystudying mathematicsandthe

classics(Bell-Gredler,1986).

Descartesandhis17thcenturyphilosophyofrationalismwouldbuild onPlato'sconceptof

innateknowledge.Rationalismholdsthat onedevelopsintellectbystronglycontemplatingafew

innateideas;Descartes'conceptof"Ithink;thereforeIam" demonstratestheemphasisonlogical

thoughtanddeduction.Basedonmathematics,rationalism'smodel formentalgrowthisavast

systemthatrevolvesaroundjustafewaxioms(Bell-Gredler,1986).Theconceptsof

introspection,deduction,andinternalmental processesinthesetwophilosophieswouldlater

influencethetheoreticaldevelopmentofcognitivepsychology.

4

PsychologicalFoundations

EarnestattemptstoexploreandunderstandthefunctionsofthemindbeganinGermanyin

thelate1800s.WilhelmWundt,thefounderofexperimentalpsychology,wasthefirsttoresearch

thecognitivestructuresinvolvedinmentalprocessing(Bell-Gredler,1986).Thoughnot

consideredacognitivetheorist,Wundtformulatedabasisforcognitiveresearchanddevelopment.

Wundt's"physiologicalpsychology"holdsthatthemind'sstructureissimilartotheclassifications

indevelopmentalbiologyandchemistry;justasmatteriscomprisedofatomsandmolecules,sois

themindcomposedofbasic,unchangingelements(Bell-Gredler,1986).

AccordingtoWundt,humanexperiencefirstconsistsofmeasurablementalfunctionssuchas

awareness,reaction;andperception(Blumenthal,1977).Astheexperiencebecomesmore

focusedtotheindividual,mentalorganizationincreasesandtransforms"vagueawarenessinto

clearattention";atthispoint,"creativesynthesis"results(Blumenthal,1977,p.16).Thus,

experiencesatthis"high"levelarefundamentallydistinctfromlowerreactions.Wundtdescribed,

"inessence,aninternalconstructionunderthedirectionofcentralself-controlprocesses"

(Blumenthal,1977,p.16).Thisapproach,latertermedstructuralism,wouldbecomeoneof

psychology'sfirstmajortheories.Wundt'sprincipleswouldeventuallyevolveintothecognitive

conceptsofexecutivemonitorandstructures.

Aspsychologybegantoemergeasanindependentscience,severalAmericansrejected

structuralism.WilliamJamesandJohnDeweybelievedthatWundt'smethodicalanalysisand

classificationofcognitiveelementswastoonarrow(Bell-Gredler,1986).Stronglyinfluencedby

Darwin'stheoryofevolution,Jamesemphasizedthe processofcognitionasitrelatedto

environmentaladaptation(McEntire,1992).Similarly,Deweyfeltthatpsychologyshould

transcendclassificationbyfocusingontheentirescopeofconsciousnessandbehaviorincluding

therelationshipbetweenbiologicaladaptationandtheenvironment(i.e.,psychologyshouldbean

appliedscience)(Bell-Gredler,1986).Thus,whilestructuralismnarrowlyreliesonintrospection

similarstimuli(e.g.,similarshape,color,etc.)together(Hansen,1986).Theseconceptsfurther

illustratetheimpactofperceptiononcognition.

AccordingtoGestalttheory,stimulionlyhavemeaningasthey arecognitivelyorganizedby

theperson.Learningisbasedonchangesintheperceptual process;thus,truelearning,orinsight,

occurswhentheindividualperceivesnewrelationshipswithinthefield(Bell-Gredler,1986).For

example,ifapersondoesnotunderstandhowtouseacertaintool,insightwillnotoccuruntilhe

orshefiguresouttherelationshipbetweenmetoolanditsfunction.Afterthatpointofdiscovery,

hisorherperceptionoftheobjectwillbeconsistentlylinkedtoits usage.Gestaltists'holistic

emphasisonperception,fields,andinsightprovidedthebasisforanumberofcognitiveconcepts,

includingschemata.Thoughbehaviorismbecamethedominant movementduringthenextfew

decades,Gestalttheorywasthetruebeginningofcognitivepsychology.

Duringthe1930s,EdwardTolmancomplementedtheGestaltviewpointwithhisconceptof

purposivebehaviorism.AccordingtoTolman,individualslearnspecificeventsthatresultinthe

satisfactionofparticulargoals.Thus,inthissystem,allbehavioris goal-oriented(Bell-Gredler,

1986).Learninginvolvesone'sexpectationsinagivensituation.Iftheexpectanciesarefulfilled,

thentheyareconfirmedandremainpartofone'sschematicframework. Naturally,one's

perceptionsofasituationgreatlyinfluenceone'sexpectationswithinthatscenario.

InoneofTolman'sintriguingexperiments,threesetsof ratsranamazedailyforseveral

weeks.Thefirstgroup-eceivedfoodattheendofthe mazewhiletheseconddidnot.Thelast

groupreceivednofoodforthefirsttendays,butwasthengiventherewardontheeleventhday.

Thethirdgroup'sperformancesubsequentlyimprovedtotheextentthatitserrorratevirtually

matchedthatofthefirstgroup(Bell-Gredler,1986).Thus,thethird setofratslearnedby

receivingthefood;however,therewardwasnotrequiredforlearningtotakeplace.Thisconcept

oflatentlearningseparatestheprocessoflearningfromperformance (Blumenthal,1977).

Tolman'sviewsharplycontrastsbehaviorallearningtheoriesthat directlylinkstimuluswith

response.Thetheoristeventuallydeterminedthatindividualsdevelopcognitivemapsofthe

environmentthatformulatethebasisforperceptionsandexpectations.Cognitivemapping

involvesthepsychologicalprocessesthatdevelopone'sviewpointsaboutrelativelocationsand

attributesinone'senvironment(Bell-Gredler,1986).Tolman'semphasisonexpectationsin

additiontohisseparationofprocessfromproductcontributedsignificantlytocognitivetheory.

Duringthisperiod,KurtLewintookasomewhatdifferentapproachtocognitivepsychology

byfocusingonaspectsofmotivationinlearning.Inseveralprominentstudies,roterehearsalof

informationresultedinlittleornosuccesswhentheindividualdidnotplantolearnthe

information.Therefore,accordingtoLewin,onelearnsonlywhenonespecificallyintendstodo

so(d'Ydewalle&Lens,1981).Lewindevelopedtheconceptofcognitivestructurestodistinguish

motivationallearningfromothertypesof;earning(Bell-Gredler,1986).Factorssuch asneeds,

motivations,andfuturetimeperspeCtiveinteractwiththesestructures toinstigatethoughtsand

behaviors(d'Ydewalle&Lens,1981).

Lewinfurtherstatedthatcognitivebehavioriscontingentuponone'swholepsychological

environment,whichincludesanumberofpositiveandnegativepsychologicalforces. These

forcesgreatlyaffectone'sreactionstocertainsituations,orlifespaces(Bell-Gredler,1986).

Whentheindividualencountersaregionoflifespacewithtwopositiveforces,theeventistermed

anapproach-approachconflict.Forexample,ifachildweregoingtoaplaygroundwithothers,he

orshewouldgettoplaywiththefriendsinadditiontoenjoyingtherides.Whenbothpositiveand

negativeforcesareexertedinasituation,theconflictiscalledapptoach-avoidance, while

avoidance-avoidanceconflictsresultfromtwonegativeforces(Bell-Gredler, 1986).Individuals

experiencethesecognitiveinfluencesinvirtually everyaspectoflife.

Eventually,Lewinstudiedsocialnormsandcomprehensive groupprocessesasrelatedto

thesefunctions(Baron&Byrne,1987).Hisconceptsofmotivationandpsychologicalforces

formedafoundationuponwhichothertheoristswouldlaterbuild; forexample,BernardWeiner's

andtransformation;theindividualcannot,however,heseparatedfromtheseobjects(Bell-Gredler,

1986).

Duringthisgrowthofintellect,oneformulatesnewmentalstructures(similartoschemata).

Inassimilation,theindividualintegratesnewinformationintotheexisting components.Analogous

tomanybiologicalprocesses(e.g.,digestion),assimilationinvolvesthe"filteringofthestimulus

throughanactionstructuresothatthestructuresarethemselvesenriched"(Bell-Gredler,1986, p.

198).Accommodationoccurswhenone'sinternalstructuresadjusttothediversityof

environmentalstimuli.Manytimes,accommodationresultsinthereorganizationofstructuresas

individualschangetheirwaysofthinking.Topreventfragmentationanddisarraywithincognitive

growth,theactiveprocessofequilibrationregulatesassimilationandaccommodationby

maintainingstabilitywithintheindividual(Bell-Gredler,1986).

Piagetalsoformulatedcognitivelevelsofdevelopment:preoperational,concreteoperations,

andformaloperations(d'Ydewalle&Lens,1981).Inthepreoperational stage(ages2-6),the

childbeginstocreaterelationshipsbetweenhis orherexperiencesandmentalactions.Theworld

isrepresentedthroughtheuseofbasic,generalizedsymbolsandlanguage.Inconcreteoperations

(ages6-10),cognitiveprocessesareusedtomanipulatesymbolsandlanguagethatdirectlyrelateto

concreteobjects.Withintheseoperations,thepersonorganizesinformationforproblem-solving

tasksintheimmediatepresent.Duringtheformaloperations stage(ages10-14),thechildcan

delveintoabstractthinking.Mentaloperationsinvolve anumberofvariablesincludingscientific

reasoningandintrospection(Bruner,1960).Piaget'sdevelopmentaltheory wouldultimatey

becomedistinctfromcognitivepsychology.Still,histhoughtscontributed tocognitivemental

modelswhicharebasedontheconceptthatthemindconstructsmodelsforuseinproblem-

solving,incomplexthought,andintheanticipationofsituations.Manycognitivetheoristswould

continuallybuilduponPiaget'sideasintheirstudies.

JeromeS.Brunerwasonesuchindividual.BrunersupportedPiaget'sfindings regarding

thenatureofknowledgeatdifferentstagesofdevelopment,buthewentontodescribethelevelsof

processinvolvedinthisgrowth.Bruner'sexaminationofsymbolicrepresentationincludesthree

components:enactive,iconic,andsymbolic.Individualsexperiencethesestagesofdevelopment

untiltheymasterallthree(Bruner,1966).Knowledgeintheenactive stageofcognitionis

manifestedthroughone'sactions.Forexample,onecandemonstratehowtorideabicyclequite

easily,butitisextremelydifficulttotellhowitisdone.Theiconiclevel involvesone'svisual

organizationandsummarizationofimages.Inthisstage,thepersoncanrecognizespecificvisual

patternsasrelatedtoparticularsituations.Ofcourse,one'sperceptionofthescenario cangreatly

affecthowonevisualizestheeventorobject.Inthesymbolicstage,experiencesaredescribed

throughsymbolicsystemssuch aslanguage(Bruner,1966).Brunerwentontostressthe

importanceoflanguageinhumancognition.Byusingthese concepts,heformulateda

prescriptive,instructionaltheoryforeffectiveteaching(Bruner, 1966).Bnmer'semphaseson

symbolicsystemsandlanguagebecamekeycomponentsofcognitivepsychology.

ForNoamChomsky,linguistics weretheultimaterepresentationofcognitiveprocesses.In

hisstudies,Chomskyanalyzedfactorsthat wereresponsibleforlhegenerationandcomprehension

oflanguage(Mayer,1981).AccordingtoChomsky,individuals possessinnatestructuresthat

determineauniversallanguage.Thisconcept accountsforthe"spontaneous,uniform,and

complexcharacteroftherulesofsentenceproductionand comprehension(Piattelli-

Palmarini,1980,p.53).Individuals,thus, cancomprehendanunlimitednumberofsentencesthat

arelinguisticallycorrect(i.e.,thatfitintotheuniversallanguage).Chomskyrelates languageto

twotypesofelements:surfacestructuresanddeepstructures(Hayes,1970).Surfacestructures

ofgrammardetermineobviousdetailssuch aswordorderwithinasentence.Forexample,the

sentenceThecatbitthedogisobviouslydifferentfromThedogbitthe catonasuperficiallevel.

Whenexaminingthedeepstructuresofthesesentences,however,theyareactuallyquitesimilarin

Otherproponentsexaminedinformationprocessing fromtheperspectiveoflanguage.For

example,JohnBransfordandJ.J.Franksemphasized theconstructiveprocessofproviding

meaningforsentences.Byconducting sentencerecognitionexperiments,BransfordandFranks

discoveredthatindividualstendtointegrateseparateideasintounifiedrepresentationsofthe

concepts.Thisprocess,inputsynthesis,involvesone's useofinternalknowledgetohelp

formulatemeaningforthesentences.Thus,the learnerconstructsthesepersonalmeaningsbased

onrelevantschemataaswellasontheexternalenvironment (Jones&Idol,1990).

Amonginformationprocessing proponents,AllenNewellandHerbertSimonwerethefirst

toapplyproblem-solvingprocessesdirectly tocomputeroperations.NewellandSimon

comprehensivelyresearched,apalyzed,andtestedproblem-solvingstrategiesintheattempt to

formulateaparallelwithincomputers(Mayer, 1981).Theprocessofstrategizinggenerally

involvesthreesteps.First,theissueispresented totheindividualaspartofaproblem space,

whichincludesthestatedproblem,the givens,andallpossibleoperations.Secondly, theperson

developsspecificgoalsandsubgoalsand beginstosearchforanswerstothesubgoals. Finally,

theindividualemploysmeans-endanalysis inordertoselectivelytestthevarious operations,to

alterorcreatenewsubgoalsifneeded,and toassessprogress(Mayer,1981).Oneonly workson

onesubgoalatattimeinthemethodicalattempttosatisfythe goalswithinthestrategy(Mayer,

1981).Inthelate1960s,Newell'sand Simon'sresearchresultedintheirdevelopment ofthe

monumentalGeneralProblemSolver, acomputerprogramthatsimulatedavarietyofhuman

problem-solvingcapabilities(Bell-Gredler,1986).Thetheoristshadopenedthefloodgatesforthe

explorationofartificialintelligence, aconceptbasedonthepremisethatcomputerscanbe

programmedtothink.Byencouragingdistinct conceptualanalysesofmentalfunctions, Newell's

andSimon'sworkcontributed tocognitiveprocessmodels,whichinvolvetheuseofflowcharts

andprogramstorepresentandpredict problem-solvingstrategies(Mayer,1981).

Conclusion

Cognitivelearningtheorieshold auniquenlaceinhistory--theyexplorethe captivatingdepths

ofthemindfromtheperspectiveof

process.Accordingtothesetheories,one'sabilitytolearn

stemsfromthewayoneperceives, organizes,stores,andretrieves information.Cognitive

approachescanbeappliedto anydiscipline.Primaryemphasesinvolve problem-solvingandthe

facilitationofstorageandretrieval ofinformationforapplication. Theongoingstudyand

enhancementofthese processescanonlybenefitourabilitytolearn moreefficientlyand

effectively.