


Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
What is CPR? CPR is a medical intervention performed on a person whose heart has stopped beating (cardiac arrest) or whose breathing has stopped (respiratory ...
Typology: Lecture notes
1 / 4
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!



There often comes a time when patients are so ill that they may only be kept alive by “artificial” means. Prior to about 1960, such patients died, but since then a number of life-sustaining or even life-restoring technologies have been invented, providing patients, families and physicians with previously unimaginable options. These technologies may at times be clearly beneficial and assist in restoring the patient to health. At other times the very same technology serves only to prolong dying and even increase the suffering of the patient. In such cases, physicians will often recommend that the technology be withheld and that the focus of treatment shift from cure to comfort. The purpose of this publication is to provide you with information about one of these life-restoring technologies, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
CPR is a medical intervention performed on a person whose heart has stopped beating (cardiac arrest) or whose breathing has stopped (respiratory arrest). CPR generally includes forceful compression of the chest over the breastbone, the placement of a tube in the windpipe (intubation) with artificial (mechanical) assisted breathing, electrical shocks to the body, the placement of large-needle IV (intravenous) lines for the administration of drugs and other more complicated procedures.
Yes and no. It is most effective in younger adult patients with certain types of heart problems or in response to complications from various medical interventions. In fact, CPR was invented to respond to unexpected death associated with anesthesia or surgery. Subsequently, many citizens in our society have been trained to perform basic CPR while awaiting the arrival of medical professionals. Heart defibrillators are often available in public spaces and many persons know of someone whose life was
saved by CPR. However, CPR is significantly less successful than portrayed on television. Overall it does not work as often or as well as many think. This is especially true when CPR is performed in the setting of expected death, and it often increases suffering.
What are the circumstances of patients for whom CPR increases suffering and is not likely to work? Frail and often older patients with multiple acute and chronic medical problems such as advanced cancer, infections, heart, liver, lung or kidney diseases so severe that they must be hospitalized are unlikely to benefit from CPR. These are patients for whom physicians may be providing aggressive medical therapies, and yet the physician would not be surprised if the patient died. Although CPR may initially restore a heartbeat in up to 25 percent of such patients, very few of these patients survive long enough to be discharged from the hospital. When they do survive, they typically have serious brain injuries and need other forms of life support that require nursing home care. See end notes.
When CPR is likely to fail, physicians will usually follow one of the oldest ethical principles of medicine, first do no harm, and recommend that resuscitation not be attempted in the event of death. A Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) order will be written, meaning that chest compressions, intubation, electrical shocks and the other technological interventions of CPR will not be attempted.
DNAR orders alone do not mean other treatments will be withdrawn or withheld. At Baylor Scott &
White, DNAR orders are always modified by an additional order to either Continue Other Treatments (COT) or to Allow Natural Death (AND). When a doctor writes a DNAR/COT order and a patient’s condition deteriorates, current treatments will be maintained or even increased, but should death occur, CPR will not be attempted. When a doctor writes a DNAR/AND order and a patient’s condition deteriorates, the patient will be allowed to die as naturally and peacefully as possible without an increase in other treatments and without any attempt at CPR. (For more information about life-sustaining treatments, please ask your nurse, physician, social worker or chaplain for Baylor Scott & White publications about Serious Illness, Artificial Nutrition and Hydration and Severe Brain Injuries. You may also access these resources and more at BSWHealth.com/PatientInformation
Many of the same considerations apply. The sad reality is that the very frailties, illnesses and advanced age that leave a patient homebound or nursing-home confined make the same patient extremely unlikely to benefit from CPR. Texas law recognizes this natural phenomenon and provides for a special type of advance directive to limit CPR outside the hospital, known as an Out-of-Hospital Do-Not-Resuscitate Order. This document is the only way to prevent paramedics from providing futile attempts at resuscitation outside the hospital setting.
Yes. Decisions about whether or not to attempt CPR (or other advanced life-sustaining therapies) are not only scientifically complex; they are ethically and emotionally difficult as well.
Deciding what is ethically right or wrong is a complicated process and individual beliefs certainly play a role in this process. We would like to share a few of our thoughts based upon years of study and reflection upon the ethical aspects of modern medicine. At Baylor Scott & White, we pride ourselves on delivering modern, quality treatment, while at the same time accepting the classic goals of medicine dating back over 2,500 years to the time of Hippocrates. Those goals in modern language are:
We also recognize that even the best science is accompanied by uncertainty that varies with the unique clinical circumstances of each patient. These unique circumstances are not only biological, but also psychological, social and even spiritual. Thus, we endorse “patient-centered decision making.” Competent patients able to communicate their preferences may make their own treatment decisions, accepting or rejecting any offered therapy.
However, when patients are no longer able to communicate, we believe that decisions should be made based upon a combination of what the patient would want if they could know all of the medical facts about their condition, and/or what is in the best interest of the patient. In circumstances in which patients are no longer able to directly make their wishes known, we turn to advance directives such as Living Wills. We also turn to families or others close to the patient, asking them to serve not so much as the final decision maker for the patient, but as a “messenger” for the patient.
this study also demonstrated a clear distinction between a “witnessed arrest”—cessation of heartbeat or breathing that occurs in the presence of a nurse or while the patient’s heart is being continuously monitored—and an “unwitnessed arrest” in which the patient is not being monitored at the moment of the arrest. Eighteen of 235 witnessed arrests survived to discharge. Four of 164 unwitnessed arrests survived to discharge.