















Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Methods of collecting data for monitoring and evaluation of population programs.
Typology: Assignments
1 / 23
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!
















23 - 27 Septemebr, 2019 Vincent Jumbe MPH, MA(Bioethics), PhD
Aim To introduce the participants to a range of methods and combinations of methods appropriate to qualitative research in the social sciences of health Specific Objectives To distinguish between qualitative and quantitative research methods To be able to describe the characteristics and techniques of qualitative methods appropriate to fieldwork To be able to use appropriate qualitative data collection methods
Qualitative Quantitative Concept Concerned with understanding human behaviour from the informant’s perspective Concerned with discovering facts about social phenomena Assumes a dynamic and negotiated reality Assumes a fixed and measurable reality Methodology Data: participant observation and interviews Data: measuring things Data analysis: Themes from descriptions of informants Data analysis: Numerical comparisons and statistical inferences Data are reported in the language of the informant Data are reported through statistical analyses WHY WHAT Source: Adapted from Minchiello et al. (1990. p.5)
Enables an exploration about how knowledge and ideas develop and operate within a given cultural context - i.e. how people think as well as what they think Encourages discussion that could surface some social norms Empowering space to discuss issues which are important to the group Generates a lot of information in a short period of time Can ‘break the ice’ in discussing taboo subjects
Produce information on norms and socially acceptable behaviour rather than private views/behaviour Can minimise dissent and create false impression of agreement Can exclude less powerful e.g. due to language, disabilities Can raise ethical issues around disclosure [ emphasise confidentiality ]
A systematic method of data collection that relies on a researcher’s ability to gather data through their senses Observation provides the opportunity to document behaviour. Hawthorne Effect Observers are prone to bias of their own worldview.
Structured: Highly systematic and often rely on predetermined criteria related to the people, events, practices, attitudes, situations and phenomena being observed Semi structured: Observers generally use some manner of observation schedule or checklist to organize observations, but also attempt to observe and record the unplanned/unexpected Unstructured: Observers attempt to observe and record data without predetermined criteria
Candid: The researcher offers full disclosure of the nature of their study and the role of the observations can play in the research Covert: Can be non-participant i.e watching behaviour in the playground. Can be participating in the activities as well. The role involves researchers going undercover in an attempt to get a real sense of a situation, context or phenomenon
Closed Open Leading questions or direct questions , usually answered by ‘yes’ or ‘no’, or a number. Do you like participatory training methods? Do you think these methods are good for learning communication skills? Give little information, and often wrong info. Often used to confirm the idea or opinion of the researcher Ask the person to describe something There is no right or wrong answer. What do you think about using participatory methods in training? Open questions give a lot of information
It often makes people feel uncomfortable. Why? Because you are asking them to justify what they have done It is often clear that the person asking the ‘why’ question disagrees, and judges them negatively for what they have done. What medicines did you give her? Why did you give her that medicine? Be careful when using ‘why’ questions – it may lead to BIAS
Some leading questions can give you biased information These questions often contain the researcher’s own perceptions, judgements or conclusions Often start with ‘why’ or ‘do you’. Examples? Do you think you are lucky to have a doctor in your area? Do you also have problems with trusting laboratory results? Why did you give fansidar to the child?
Why is active listening important? Best way to get good quality information Makes you feel good- you have the full attention of another person It stimulates openness and creativity- helping to formulate ideas and opinions Feel respected and valued, personally and professionally