Dimensional Analysis, Lecture Notes - Physics - Prof IB Leader 1, Study notes of Physics

Introduction, Units scales of Units, Convention Principle of Dimensional Consistency, Dimensionless Quantities, Dimension Equations

Typology: Study notes

2010/2011

Uploaded on 09/07/2011

hawking
hawking 🇬🇧

4.4

(25)

268 documents

1 / 10

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
IA DA GTP
PART IA: DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS
HANDOUT 1
AIMS OF THE COURSE
To introduce and illustrate the use of Dimensional Analysis.
To develop an understanding of the principle of dimensional consistency and how it can
be used:
to check the units of an equation,
to convert from one system of measuring units to another.
To develop the techniques required to form dimensionless quantities and relationships.
To explain how Dimensional Analysis can be used:
to simplify problems by reducing the number of parameters,
to correlate experimental data,
to assist in the design of models for testing.
LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS
Use of Dimensional Analysis in model testing to obtain general expressions for a number of
problems:
Dimensional Analysis 1: The deflection of an elastic beam under load.
Dimensional Analysis 2A: The temperature variation in two blocks initially at
different temperatures.
Dimensional Analysis 2B: The flow over a “V” notch weir.
RECOMMENDED READING
Book Title: Dimensional Analysis and Scale Factors
Author: R.C. Pankhurst
Publisher: Chapman and Hall
Shelf Mark: EV 8
Guide: Guide to Units, Unit Symbols and Abbreviations
Author: G.T. Parks
Source: CUED Data Book Folder
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa

Partial preview of the text

Download Dimensional Analysis, Lecture Notes - Physics - Prof IB Leader 1 and more Study notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

PART IA: DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

HANDOUT 1

AIMS OF THE COURSE

 To introduce and illustrate the use of Dimensional Analysis.

 To develop an understanding of the principle of dimensional consistency and how it can

be used:

  • to check the units of an equation,
  • to convert from one system of measuring units to another.

 To develop the techniques required to form dimensionless quantities and relationships.

 To explain how Dimensional Analysis can be used:

  • to simplify problems by reducing the number of parameters,
  • to correlate experimental data,
  • to assist in the design of models for testing.

LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS

Use of Dimensional Analysis in model testing to obtain general expressions for a number of

problems:

 Dimensional Analysis 1: The deflection of an elastic beam under load.

 Dimensional Analysis 2A: The temperature variation in two blocks initially at

different temperatures.

 Dimensional Analysis 2B: The flow over a “V” notch weir.

RECOMMENDED READING

Book Title: Dimensional Analysis and Scale Factors

Author: R.C. Pankhurst

Publisher: Chapman and Hall

Shelf Mark: EV 8

Guide: Guide to Units, Unit Symbols and Abbreviations

Author: G.T. Parks

Source: CUED Data Book Folder

PART IA: DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS

1. INTRODUCTION

Dimensional Analysis uses our knowledge of the systems of measuring units and the

dimensions of physical quantities in the solution of engineering problems. If we have a

theory, dimensional analysis complements it, but we can also get close to the answer

without one.

Dimensional Analysis allows us to:

 Convert from one system of units to another.

 Check the units of an equation.

 Simplify problems by reducing the number of parameters.

 Plan experiments so as to reduce the effort required to investigate the situation under

consideration.

 Design and use models for experimental tests.

 Correlate experimental data.

 Graphically present the results of experimentation or analysis more concisely.

2. UNITS

Basic units are defined as standards for the purpose of comparison or measurement. In

many systems units of

mass , length , time , electric current , temperature and luminous intensity

are chosen. The S.I. (Système International) system of units (also known as the metric

system) takes as basic units:

Quantity Name Symbol Units

mass kilogram kg kg

length metre m m

time second s s

electric current ampere A A

absolute temperature kelvin K K

luminous intensity candela cd cd

Derived units are formed from the basic units either by definition or through some physical

law.

4. CONVERSION OF UNITS

Different systems of units (e.g. S.I., Imperial) have different definitions. By comparing the

definitions in different systems of units, we can convert between the systems. For the S.I.

and Imperial systems, the data books give:

1 lb = 0.45359237 kg (approximately)

1 ft = 0.3048 m (exactly!!)

So the feet-to-metres length conversion factor is 1 ft

  1. 3048 m = 1.

Example: A typical car is 14 ft long. Find its length in m.

14 ft = 14 ft × 1 ft

  1. 3048 m = 4.267 m

This is a typical conversion between basic units, involving a single conversion factor.

Conversions between derived units are slightly more complicated, generally requiring the

use of both conversion factors between basic units and scale factors.

Example: A typical car speed is 35 mph. Find this speed in m s

  • 1 .

35 mph = 35 hr

mile × 3600 s

1 hr × 1 mile

5280 ft × 1 ft

  1. 3048 m = 15.65 m s
  • 1

To minimise the chance of errors in conversion, keep unit symbols in your arithmetical

working (as in the examples above). If the conversion is set up correctly, unwanted units

should cancel. For example:

35 mph = 35 hr

mile × 3600 s

1 hr × 1 mile

5280 ft × 1 ft

  1. 3048 m = 15.65 m s
  • 1

 Now have a go at Questions 1 and 2 on the Examples Paper.

5. AN EXAMPLE OF WHY THE FOREGOING IS IMPORTANT

For more information about this story see:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/514763.stm

http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/

To read about another famous “conversion factor” incident see:

http://www.wadenelson.com/gimli.html

Friday, October 1, 1999 LA Times

Mars Probe Lost Due to Simple Math Error

By ROBERT LEE HOTZ, Times Science Writer

Why it is so crucial to always double check your data entries and data manipulations.

NASA lost its $125-million Mars Climate Orbiter because spacecraft engineers failed

to convert from English to metric measurements when exchanging vital data before the

craft was launched, space agency officials said Thursday.

A navigation team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory used the metric system of newtons

and meters in its calculations, while Lockheed Martin Astronautics in Denver, which

designed and built the spacecraft, provided crucial data in the English system of

inches, feet and pounds.

As a result, JPL engineers mistook readings measured in English units of pound-

seconds for a metric measure of impulse called newton-seconds. In a sense, the

spacecraft was lost in translation.

"That is so dumb," said John Logsdon, director of George Washington University's

space policy institute…

7. THE PRINCIPLE OF DIMENSIONAL CONSISTENCY

A complete statement of a physical law is independent of the system of measurement.

This implies that any consistent system of units may be used to substitute in a proper

(dimensionally consistent) algebraic equation.

As a demonstration, consider the simple pendulum:

Quantity Symbol Typical Units Dimensions

period t s T

length l m L

gravitational acceleration g m s

  • 2 LT - 2

In one system of units, we find, by experiment, that the period t is given by:

Equation t = 2 π g

l

Dimensions T 2 LT

L

!

= T

Both the LHS and RHS have dimensions T, so the equation is dimensionally consistent.

(Being a pure number, the term “2π” is dimensionless, of course.)

Now, consider using another set of measuring units, say, “heart-beats” (symbol hb) and

“arm-lengths” (symbol al):

Quantity Symbol Typical Units Dimensions

period t! hb T

length l! al L

gravitational acceleration g! al hb

  • 2 LT - 2

We would have time (1 hb =! s) and length (1 al = !m) conversion factors:

time: 1 1 hb

s

length: 1 1 al

m

Now: t !hb = t! hb × 1 hb

! s = t "! s = t s

So, we have t = " t !and, similarly, l = " l !, while:

g! al hb

  • 2 = g! 2 hb

al × 1 al

! m ×

2

s

1 hb !

2 !

g # m s

  • 2 = g m s - 2

Hence g = g!

" 2 #$.

The equation in the original measuring units is:

g

l t = 2!

On changing the measuring units we obtain:

g

l t !

2

i.e. g

l t !

!^ = 2 " THE SAME!!

So the principle of dimensional consistency is demonstrated.

In reality, any valid equation must be dimensionally consistent.

There are many equations that, on first inspection, appear not to be dimensionally

consistent. Consider, for example, the equation for the gravitational force between two

bodies, of masses m and M , a distance r apart:

Equation F = 2 r

GMm

Dimensions

2 MLT

! 2 L

(M)(M)

2 2 M L

!

These expressions appear not to be dimensionally consistent. So what is wrong?

The answer is that the constant G is not dimensionless, as has been assumed here. In fact, it

has dimensions L

3 M

  • 1 T - 2 . Thus:

Equation F = 2 r

GMm

Dimensions

2 MLT

! 2

3 1 2

L

(L M T )(M)(M )

!!

2 MLT

!

The practical significance of this is that, although if a given system of units is used G will

have a constant value, if a different system of units is used the governing equation will be of

the same form, BUT G will take a different value, G !, say. The value of G! can be found

from the value of G using the rules for conversion of units shown earlier.

Conversely, if a constant appearing in an equation is dimensionless, then its value will be

the same whatever system of units is used.

 Now have a go at Questions 3 and 4 on the Examples Paper.

Example: For the simple pendulum we have, in different systems of units:

g

l t = 2! and g

l t !

These can be rearranged to give the dimensionless form:

l

g t and =! "

l

g t

Thus, the dimensionless group ( t gl ) has the same value in both measuring systems.

9. DIMENSIONLESS EQUATIONS

The observation that the value of a dimensionless group does not depend on the system of

measuring units suggests that this type of quantity could be “fundamental” in physical

problems. The principle of dimensional consistency (PDC) tells us that:

In a complete statement of a physical law,

it is possible to rearrange the terms so that all groups or quantities are dimensionless.

Example: Consider a car moving at an initial velocity u which is then accelerated at a

constant rate a. We require the velocity v after a time t.

Equation v = u + at

Typical units m s

  • 1 m s - 1 m s - 2 s = m s - 1

Dimensions LT

  • 1 LT - 1 LT - 2 T = LT - 1

The equation is, of course, dimensionally consistent and we can rearrange it to give:

Equation u

v = 1 + u

at

Inspection shows that both vu and atu are dimensionless. Thus, this dimensionless

equation contains all the information in the original equation, but in just two dimensionless

groups ( vu and atu ) and one dimensionless quantity (1).