Electrical Engineer - Commerce and Risk - Exam, Exams of Trade and Commerce

Electrical Engineer, Greenlight, Sick Leave, Albert Telephoned Simon, Wrongly Decided, Ordinary Agency Rules, Business Repairing, Insurance Policy, Contract Clause, Under the Policy. Past exam for Commerce and Risk.

Typology: Exams

2011/2012

Uploaded on 12/13/2012

deviprasad
deviprasad 🇮🇳

3.7

(7)

74 documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
PRIFYSGOL ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY
DEGREE EXAMINATIONS 2012
DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY
COMMERCE AND RISK (LA31810)
Time allowed ONE AND A HALF hours
Answer TWO questions
Candidates are not permitted to bring any books, notes or any other materials into the
examination.
1. Answer (a) and (b)
(a) Albert is an electrical engineer employed by Greenlight Ltd which has been
contracted to build a wind farm near Aberystwyth. Albert telephoned Simon, who is the sales
co-ordinator of Plasto Ltd, to ask for a quotation for cables on behalf of Greenlight Ltd.
Albert introduces himself as an engineer of Greenlight Ltd. Simon faxes the quotation of
£13,476 to Greenlight Ltd for the attention of Albert. One week later Simon telephones
Greenlight Ltd to find out whether the quote was acceptable and asks the secretary who
answers the phone as to who is responsible for purchase orders and is told that it is Albert but
that he is on sick leave. Two weeks after that Albert telephoned Simon to confirm the order,
telling him that he would collect the cables that afternoon. In the afternoon Albert arrives at
Plasto Ltd‟s site in a van with Greenlight Ltd written on it, wearing a company uniform and
giving Simon the completed purchase order form signed by Albert on behalf of Greenlight
Ltd. Simon gives him the delivery order and the invoice, and Albert drives off with the
cables. When Plasto Ltd seeks payment from Greenlight Ltd, Greenlight Ltd refuses having
never received any cables. Albert who has since been dismissed, used to be responsible for
administering the orders, but not for making them.
Advise Plasto Ltd.
(b) Explain why the case of Watteau v Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346 cannot be
accommodated within ordinary agency rules. Do you think it was wrongly decided?
Please turn over….
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download Electrical Engineer - Commerce and Risk - Exam and more Exams Trade and Commerce in PDF only on Docsity!

PRIFYSGOL ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY

DEGREE EXAMINATIONS 2012

DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY

COMMERCE AND RISK (LA31810)

Time allowed ONE AND A HALF hours

Answer TWO questions

Candidates are not permitted to bring any books, notes or any other materials into the examination.

1. Answer (a) and (b)

(a) Albert is an electrical engineer employed by Greenlight Ltd which has been contracted to build a wind farm near Aberystwyth. Albert telephoned Simon, who is the sales co-ordinator of Plasto Ltd, to ask for a quotation for cables on behalf of Greenlight Ltd. Albert introduces himself as an engineer of Greenlight Ltd. Simon faxes the quotation of £13,476 to Greenlight Ltd for the attention of Albert. One week later Simon telephones Greenlight Ltd to find out whether the quote was acceptable and asks the secretary who answers the phone as to who is responsible for purchase orders and is told that it is Albert but that he is on sick leave. Two weeks after that Albert telephoned Simon to confirm the order, telling him that he would collect the cables that afternoon. In the afternoon Albert arrives at Plasto Ltd‟s site in a van with Greenlight Ltd written on it, wearing a company uniform and giving Simon the completed purchase order form signed by Albert on behalf of Greenlight Ltd. Simon gives him the delivery order and the invoice, and Albert drives off with the cables. When Plasto Ltd seeks payment from Greenlight Ltd, Greenlight Ltd refuses having never received any cables. Albert who has since been dismissed, used to be responsible for administering the orders, but not for making them.

Advise Plasto Ltd.

(b) Explain why the case of Watteau v Fenwick [1893] 1 QB 346 cannot be accommodated within ordinary agency rules. Do you think it was wrongly decided?

Please turn over….

2. Answer (a) and (b)

(a) Adam runs a business repairing antique clocks and other antique mechanical devices. His combined property and contents insurance includes a section on loss due to fire. When a fire due to an electrical fault destroys the premises and all of its content, the insurance company refuses to pay out on the following alternative grounds:

 The insurance policy contained „a basis of the contract clause‟ and in the proposal form Adam had answered „yes‟ to the question: „Is an operational intruder alarm fitted in the property?‟ which was not true at the time. However, Adam has had one fitted shortly afterwards.  Adam had failed to disclose that he was the subject of an internal fraud inquiry by his previous employer 4 years ago. He was eventually cleared of all suspicions.  Adam had wrongly valued the replacement cost of the content of the premises at £50,000, when in fact it was £70,000.

Advise Adam. Also, would Adam‟s customers who left their antiques in Adam‟s shop in order to be repaired be able to recover under the policy?

(b) An insurance company seeks your advice in relation to its all-risk standard form insurance policy for small businesses. What advice would you give in relation to:

 Ensuring full disclosure of relevant facts in the proposal form  The use of the term “warranty” in the policy document  The use of sections in the policy

Please turn over…..