






Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
An overview of the Image Processing with Biomedical Applications course offered by Prof. Barner at the University of Delaware. various topics related to image processing, including the structure of the human eye, brightness adaptation and discrimination, Weber ratio, simultaneous contrast, and human perception influences. It also discusses the electromagnetic spectrum, radiance and luminance, image acquisition, sampling and quantization, and digital image representation.
Typology: Exercises
1 / 10
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!







Image Processing Introduction Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 2
Digital Image Processing, Gonzalez & Woods Introduction to the Mathematics of Medical Imaging, Epstein
Tests: midterm and final Homework and small projects Final independent research project
Image Processing with Biomedical Applications ELEG-475/ Prof. Barner
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 4
Enclosing membranes: Outer – cornea, sclera Choroid Retina Iris opening (2-8 mm) Retina light receptors Cones in fovea 6-7 million color sensitive Photopic (bright-light) vision Rods 75-150 million Not color sensitive Scotopic (low-light) vision
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 5
Fovea Size: approximately 1.5 mm x 1.5 mm Cone density: approximately 150,000 elements per mm 2
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 6
Focal length distance between lens center and retina Approximately 14-17 mm By geometry, the image in the above example is 2.55 mm high on the retina Falls primarily in the fovea
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 7
Light sensitivity range: 10 10 Subjective (perceived) brightness logarithmic Entire range cannot be perceived simultaneously Brightness adaptation Photopic (cone) range is greater than scotopic (rod) range
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 8
Ability to discriminate between changes in light intensity Flat field I Short duration increment ∆ I Record 50% discrimination point Brightness discrimination is poor at low levels of illumination Rods have better discrimination
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 13
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 14
Wavelength (λ) and frequency (ν) relation:
where c is the speed of light (2.998x10 8 m/s) Energy (electron-volts) is given by
where h Planck’s constant Electromagnetic waves can be visualized as: Propagating sinusoidal waves A stream of massless particles (photons) moving at the speed of light Higher frequency photons possess more energy Gamma rays are dangerous while radio waves are not
E = hv
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 15
Monochromatic (achromatic) light is void of color Intensity (gray level) is the defining attribute Radiance is the total energy that flows from a light source Luminance is the level of energy and observer perceives from a light source
Fundamental limit: To see an object the electromagnetic wavelength must be no bigger than the object To image molecules far ultraviolet or soft x-ray waves must be used
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 16
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 17
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 18
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 19
Illumination bound: Reflectivity bound: Transmission cases (x-ray): transmissivity rather than reflectivity Frequency dependent functions
0 < i x y ( , )< ∞
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 20
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 25
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 26
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 27
Resolution requirements are detail-level dependent
Isopreference curves give ( N,k) pairs that produce equal subjective quality Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 28
Subjective quality for detailed images depends primarily on spatial resolution Low detail images are sensitive to the number of gray levels
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 29
Shannon Sampling Theorem: signals must be sampled at a rate at least twice the highest frequency to avoid aliasing
Paradox Only infinite time duration signals may be band-limited Finite time duration signals have infinite bandwidth No practical signals are band-limited
Special case: periodic signals can be preserved by sampling over a finite interval The sampling must capture an integer number of periods
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 30
Each grate is periodic Their superposition breaks the periodicity Aliasing occurs The problem is common in scanning of printed material Periodicities do not line up causing aliasing
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 31
Both operations involve resampling Zooming is oversampling Shrinking is undersampling
Nearest neighbor interpolation Overlay two sampling grids (known and unknown) Populate unknown grid with the closest sample from unknown grid Special case: pixel replication Integer increases in sampling rate Repeat rows, columns, etc.
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 32
Unknown pixels are formed as a (distance) weighted sum of the four closest known pixels
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 37
Consider the 4-, 8-, and m-paths of this figure Binary case, V ={1}
Under what connectivity are the 45° and -45° lines distinct?
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 38
A path is closed if p^0 =p N Let S be a subset of pixels in an image p and q are connected in S if there exists a path between them consisting entirely of pixels in S For any p in S , the set of pixels connected to p in S is the connected component of S S is a connected set if it has only one connected component Connected subsets are referred to as regions The boundary of a region R is the set of pixels in the region that have one or more neighbors outside R Boundaries form closed paths (different concept than edge)
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 39
Let p, q, and z be pixels. D is a distance functions (metric) if D ( p,q )≥ 0 ( D ( p,q )=0 iff p=q ), D ( p,q )= D ( q,p ), and D ( p,z )≤ D ( p,q )+ D ( q,z )
Euclidean distance: D (^) e ( p,q)= [( p (^) c1 -q (^) c1 )^2 + ( p (^) c2 -q (^) c2 )^2 ]½
City-block distance: D 4 ( p,q)= | p (^) c1 -q (^) c1 |+ | p (^) c2 -q (^) c2 |
Chessboard distance: D 8 ( p,q )=max(| p (^) c1 -q (^) c1 |, | p (^) c2 -q (^) c2 |)
Image Processing Imaging Fundamentals Prof. Barner, ECE Department, University of Delaware 40
D 4 example: 2 2 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 2 2 D 8 example:
D (^) m distance is defined as the length of the shortest m -path
2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2