



Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Prepare for your exams
Study with the several resources on Docsity
Earn points to download
Earn points by helping other students or get them with a premium plan
Quantitative Research Format Research - IMRaD
Typology: High school final essays
1 / 5
This page cannot be seen from the preview
Don't miss anything!




Juan A. Dela Cruz, Pedro G. Penduko, & Harry S. Roque Senior High School, International School, Lyceum of the Philippines University Cavite Abstract A concise and factual abstract is required (between 200 - 250 words). The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. It should be bold Italic. The whole manuscript except the title must follow the Times New Roman Font Style with 11 font size and single spaced. The 8.5” x 11” is the size of the paper to be used with margin of 1” in all sides. The name and surname of the author(s), their title, and the affiliation they work for and email address must be written. A concise and factual abstract is required (between 200 - 250 words). The abstract should state briefly the purpose of the research, the principal results and major conclusions. It should be bold Italic. The whole manuscript except the title must follow the Times New Roman Font Style with 11 font size and single spaced. The 8.5” x 11” is the size of the paper to be used with margin of 1” in all sides. The name and surname of the author(s), their title, and the affiliation they work for and email address must be written. Keywords: Provide 3-5 keywords or phrases in alphabetical order, separated by commas.
1. Introduction Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs in total. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. Background of the study is composed of at least in one to two paragraphs. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale
and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The research gap, rationale and/or purpose of your paper should be explained at least in one (1) paragraph. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. The scope and limitation and significance of the study should be stated at least in one to two paragraphs. 1.1 Literature Review The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7- published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7-10 published articles/sources. The synthesis of Review of Related Literature (RRL) is composed of at least three to five paragraphs with minimum of 7- published articles/sources. 1.2 Objectives of the Study The first paragraph of this portion should underscore the general objective of your study. The number of sentences may be from one to two sentences and should not necessarily apply the rule of number of sentences prescribed in your Introduction.
variables involved in the topic under investigation. The paragraph should account at least 5 and maximum of 7 sentences in total. Explain your conceptual framework in one to two paragraphs. Explanation should briefly include the relationship of the variables involved in the topic under investigation. The paragraph should account at least 5 and maximum of 7 sentences in total. Explain your conceptual framework in one to two paragraphs. Explanation should briefly include the relationship of the variables involved in the topic under investigation. The paragraph should account at least 5 and maximum of 7 sentences in total. Explain your conceptual framework in one to two paragraphs. Explanation should briefly include the relationship of the variables involved in the topic under investigation. The paragraph should account at least 5 and maximum of 7 sentences in total. 2.3 Operational Definition of Terms Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. 2.4 Research Instrument Describe what is the instrument to be utilized. In the event that the research shall create a survey questionnaire, formulate your questions ACCORDING to the objectives you set, hence making them as constructs in this respect. After the formulation of questions needed in the questionnaire, the researchers shall need to consult a topic expert, whose occupation and field of expertise is highly inclined to the field being investigated of the present study to validate the said material. Likewise, for concerns such as technicalities and appropriate wording, the material must be consulted to an English critic to check those basic technical aspects of the instrument. Reliability index must be reported, if in case that the instrument is adopted. 2.5 Participants Explain here who your participants are. Explain the criteria in selecting them, which may include the age, place, gender, and how you recruited them. This part should also narrate the sampling technique and sample size you employed in selecting your participants. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. Use this format in this section: term one , define the term operationally in one sentence; term two , define the terms operationally in one sentence; and term three , define the term operationally in one sentence. 2.6 Data Gathering Process Gathering the data needed in the study may include phases that may actualize the entirety of the present study. For example: Phase 1: narrate the formulation or adoption of questionnaire to be utilized. Phase 2 on the other hand may include the narration of the process of instrument validation and tell whom you had
consulted your instrument. This can be skipped if you adopted questionnaire. Phase 3 may narrate the modification if there is any, and the administration of the questionnaire, and lastly, Phase 4 narrating how the collected data were analysed. Gathering the data needed in the study may include phases that may actualize the entirety of the present study. For example: Phase 1: narrate the formulation or adoption of questionnaire to be utilized. Phase 2 on the other hand may include the narration of the process of instrument validation and tell whom you had consulted your instrument. This can be skipped if you adopted questionnaire. Phase 3 may narrate modification if there is any, and the administration of the questionnaire, and lastly, Phase 4 narrating how the collected data were analysed. 2.7 Data Analysis This portion narrates how the collected data will be analyzed and likewise explains the employment of specific statistical tool/treatment to analyze these collected data. This portion narrates how the collected data will be analyzed and likewise explains the employment of specific statistical tool/treatment to analyze these collected data. This portion narrates how the collected data will be analyzed and likewise explains the employment of specific statistical tool/treatment to analyze these collected data. This portion narrates how the collected data will be analyzed and likewise explains the employment of specific statistical tool/treatment to analyze these collected data. This portion narrates how the collected data will be analyzed and likewise explains the employment of specific statistical tool/treatment to analyze these collected data. 2.8 Ethical Considerations This portion discusses the relevant information from the participants and their anonymity. The participants should be given adequate details to make informed decision of their involvement in the study, which must completely voluntary. Retrieval of necessary information from the participants should be consented before the administration of data gathering.
**3. Results and Discussion