Quantum Computation: Probability of Qubit States and Hadamard Transform, Exams of Mathematics

Information on mathematical topics related to quantum computation, specifically the probability of finding a qubit in a certain state after interference and the use of the hadamard transform. It includes questions on single qubit interference probabilities, the effect of decoherence on these probabilities, and the implementation and usefulness of the hadamard transform in quantum algorithms.

Typology: Exams

2012/2013

Uploaded on 02/28/2013

shaina_44kin
shaina_44kin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ

3.9

(9)

64 documents

1 / 5

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III
Tuesday 3 June 2003 9 to 11
PAPER 47
INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM COMPUTATION
Attempt THREE questions.
There are four questions in total.
The questions are of equal weight.
You may not start to read the questions
printed on the subsequent pages until
instructed to do so by the Invigilator.
pf3
pf4
pf5

Partial preview of the text

Download Quantum Computation: Probability of Qubit States and Hadamard Transform and more Exams Mathematics in PDF only on Docsity!

MATHEMATICAL TRIPOS Part III

Tuesday 3 June 2003 9 to 11

PAPER 47

INTRODUCTION TO QUANTUM COMPUTATION

Attempt THREE questions.

There are four questions in total. The questions are of equal weight.

You may not start to read the questions

printed on the subsequent pages until

instructed to do so by the Invigilator.

1 A quantum network which describes single qubit interference can be represented as follows:

H H

ฯ†

(1) What is the probability P 0 (ฯ†) that a qubit initially in state | 0 ใ€‰ will be found in state | 0 ใ€‰ at the output if it is measured in the {| 0 ใ€‰, | 1 ใ€‰} basis?

(2) Now suppose, that after the phase gate and before the second Hadamard gate, the qubit undergoes decoherence by interacting with an environment in state | e ใ€‰ so that: | 0 ใ€‰| e ใ€‰ 7 โ†’ | 0 ใ€‰| e 0 ใ€‰, (1)

| 1 ใ€‰| e ใ€‰ 7 โ†’ | 1 ใ€‰| e 1 ใ€‰, (2)

where | e 0 ใ€‰ and | e 1 ใ€‰ are the new states of the environment which are normalized but not necessarily orthogonal. The decoherence modifies P 0 (ฯ†) which becomes a function of ฯ† and of the scalar product ใ€ˆ e 0 | e 1 ใ€‰. Writing ใ€ˆ e 0 | e 1 ใ€‰ = veiฮฑ^ express P 0 as a function of ฯ†, v, and ฮฑ.

(3) Suppose the decoherence takes place between the first Hadamard gate and the phase gate, how different is the expression for P 0 (ฯ†, v, ฮฑ)? (4) Deutschโ€™s algorithm with an oracle f : { 0 , 1 } 7 โ†’ { 0 , 1 }, is implemented by the following network, where the central two-qubit gate is the oracle implementing the operation, | x ใ€‰| y ใ€‰ 7 โ†’ | x ใ€‰| x โŠ• f (y) ใ€‰ and | ยฏ 0 ใ€‰ = โˆš^12 (| 0 ใ€‰ โˆ’ | 1 ใ€‰) :

H ^ H 

f

0

0 0

Measurement

Assume that only the first (top) qubit is affected by decoherence as described by Eqs.(1) and (2). How reliably can you tell whether f is constant or balanced?

Paper 47

3 Let A and B be two 2 ร— 2 matrices. The inner product of A and B is defined

as 12 Tr

Aโ€ B

. Show that the identity ฯƒ 0 =

, the bit flip ฯƒ 1 =

, the

phase flip ฯƒ 3 =

, and the bit and phase flip ฯƒ 2 = iฯƒ 1 ฯƒ 3 =

0 โˆ’i i 0

form an

orthonormal basis in a space of 2 ร— 2 matrices, i.e. any 2 ร— 2 matrix E can be written as

E = 12

โˆ‘^3

k=

Tr (ฯƒkE) ฯƒk. (3)

Suppose error E entangles a qubit with its environment according to the rules

| 0 ใ€‰| e ใ€‰ 7 โ†’ | 0 ใ€‰| e 00 ใ€‰ + | 1 ใ€‰| e 01 ใ€‰ | 1 ใ€‰| e ใ€‰ 7 โ†’ | 0 ใ€‰| e 10 ใ€‰ + | 1 ใ€‰| e 11 ใ€‰,

where | e ใ€‰, | enm ใ€‰, n, m = 0, 1 are the states of the environment which are not necessarily orthogonal or normalized. The r.h.s. of the two equations above can be conveniently written in the matrix form as ( | e 00 ใ€‰ | e 01 ใ€‰ | e 10 ใ€‰ | e 11 ใ€‰

Using Eq.(4) together with Eq.(3), or otherwise, show that for any pure state of the qubit | ฮจ ใ€‰, the action of the error E can be represented as

| ฮจ ใ€‰| e ใ€‰ 7 โ†’

โˆ‘^3

k=

(ฯƒk| ฮจ ใ€‰) | ek ใ€‰,

for some states of the environment | ek ใ€‰ which are not necessarily orthonormal. Express | ek ใ€‰ in terms of | emn ใ€‰.

Suppose we are given a noisy single qubit channel in which the probability of a phase flip error is q and no other errors occur. Consider an arrangement, shown in the diagram below, in which the qubit in some unknown state of the form | ฯ‡ ใ€‰ = ฮฑ| 0 ใ€‰ + ฮฒ| 1 ใ€‰ is encoded into a three qubit state

ฮฑ| ยฏ 0 ใ€‰| ยฏ 0 ใ€‰| ยฏ 0 ใ€‰ + ฮฒ| ยฏ 1 ใ€‰| ยฏ 1 ใ€‰| ยฏ 1 ใ€‰,

where | ยฏ 0 ใ€‰ = โˆš^12 (| 0 ใ€‰ + | 1 ใ€‰) and | ยฏ 1 ใ€‰ = โˆš^12 (| 0 ใ€‰ โˆ’ | 1 ใ€‰). The three qubits are transmitted

through the channel and subsequently decoded.

Encoding Noisy Channel Decoding

H

H

H

H

H

H

0

0

ฯ‡ ฯ‡

What is the probability of successful recovery of the input state ฮฑ| 0 ใ€‰ + ฮฒ| 1 ใ€‰?

Paper 47

4 The quantum Fourier transform on the group ZN acts on a Hilbert space of dimension N = 2n. It is defined by linearity and its action on an orthonormal basis, {| 0 ใ€‰, | 1 ใ€‰, | 2 ใ€‰,... , | N โˆ’ 1 ใ€‰}:

QFn : | x ใ€‰ 7 โ†’ โˆš^1 N

Nโˆ‘ โˆ’ 1

y=

e

2 ฯ€ixy N (^) | y ใ€‰.

The single qubit unitary transformation Rk is defined as

Rk =

0 e

2 ฯ€i 2 k

(1) Show that QFn can be implemented by a quantum network of size O(n^2 ) built from Hadamard gates and controlled Rk gates for k = 1, 2 ,... , n.

(2) If U 1 , U 2 , ...Um and V 1 , V 2 , ...Vm are unitary operators with ||Uk โˆ’ Vk|| <  for k = 1, 2 ,... , m, show that

||U 1 U 2 ...Um โˆ’ V 1 V 2 ...Vm|| < m,

where the operator norm is defined as, ||A||^2 = (^) ||ฯˆsup||=1 ใ€ˆ ฯˆ |A+A| ฯˆ ใ€‰.

Suppose that an approximate QFn network is built with approximate Hadamard and approximate controlled Rk gates which implement unitary operations Gโ€ฒ^ that approximate the specified gate operators G in the sense that

||Gโ€ฒ^ โˆ’ G|| โ‰ค (^) n^14.

Show that the resulting network operation Un satisfies

||Un โˆ’ QFn|| = 0

n^2

Comment briefly on the practical implications.

Paper 47