KBT2, Differentiated Instruction, Task 3Learning OutcomesThe, Lecture notes of Accounting

KBT2, Differentiated Instruction, Task 3Learning OutcomesThe learning objective for the objective section of the English summative assessment is for students to identify the seven types of figurative language. The learning objective for the performance section of the English summative assessment is for students to create examples of figurative language.Assessment ModificationFor Mingyu, because she is a Level 4 ELL student, I would modify her objective section of the summative assessment by allowing her to answer orally after I have read each question to her. I would also shorten the test on this portion to only seven questions instead of ten. For the performance section of the summative assessment, I would modify it by only requiring her to write one sentence about the subject she most prefers: either a person, a place, or a thing and I would also modify it for her by adjusting my rubric for her as well. As a level 4 student, she has the ability to use and understand the language i

Typology: Lecture notes

2023/2024

Available from 07/05/2024

helperatsof-1
helperatsof-1 🇺🇸

4.2

(5)

14K documents

1 / 3

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
KBT2 TASK THREE 1
KBT2, Differentiated Instruction, Task 3
Learning Outcomes
The learning objective for the objective section of the English summative assessment is
for students to identify the seven types of figurative language. The learning objective for the
performance section of the English summative assessment is for students to create examples of
figurative language.
Assessment Modification
For Mingyu, because she is a Level 4 ELL student, I would modify her objective section
of the summative assessment by allowing her to answer orally after I have read each question to
her. I would also shorten the test on this portion to only seven questions instead of ten. For the
performance section of the summative assessment, I would modify it by only requiring her to
write one sentence about the subject she most prefers: either a person, a place, or a thing and I
would also modify it for her by adjusting my rubric for her as well. As a level 4 student, she has
the ability to use and understand the language in oral discourse, but will need support when
attempting to understand the written language. As such, the teacher’s rubric, in order to follow
the support from her IEP, needs to be adjusted.
Vincente being a Level 2 ELL student will need modifications as well. I would tell the
teacher to also allow Vincente to answer orally after each question is read to him for the
objective assessment. I would also suggest shortening the test length to seven questions on this
section and I would create an alternate assessment with more obvious answers, easier examples
and/or limited answer choices. To modify the performance section and follow Vincente’s IEP, I
would suggest that the teacher provide sentence stems for Vincente and shorten the sentences as
much as possible. This would ensure that the teacher is following the Level 2 ELL support and
still assessing Vincente’s ability to complete the objective.
Justification
For Mingyu, allowing her to answer orally after having been read the question aloud
gives her a chance to use her understanding of the oral discourse to her best ability. By
shortening this portion the teacher would be decreasing the chances for Mingyu to get the
multiple terms confused with one another which will ensure that the content covered on her
assessment will align with the content from the lesson and will help her to demonstrate mastery
of standards 6 and 3. During the performance section of the assessment Mingyu will benefit by
only being required to write one sentence because it will allow her to focus on making sure this
one sentence is as correct as it can be and will remove the opportunity for excess errors. She will
also be selecting one figurative term that she is most comfortable with and writing about the
pf3

Partial preview of the text

Download KBT2, Differentiated Instruction, Task 3Learning OutcomesThe and more Lecture notes Accounting in PDF only on Docsity!

KBT2, Differentiated Instruction, Task 3 Learning Outcomes The learning objective for the objective section of the English summative assessment is for students to identify the seven types of figurative language. The learning objective for the performance section of the English summative assessment is for students to create examples of figurative language. Assessment Modification For Mingyu, because she is a Level 4 ELL student, I would modify her objective section of the summative assessment by allowing her to answer orally after I have read each question to her. I would also shorten the test on this portion to only seven questions instead of ten. For the performance section of the summative assessment, I would modify it by only requiring her to write one sentence about the subject she most prefers: either a person, a place, or a thing and I would also modify it for her by adjusting my rubric for her as well. As a level 4 student, she has the ability to use and understand the language in oral discourse, but will need support when attempting to understand the written language. As such, the teacher’s rubric, in order to follow the support from her IEP, needs to be adjusted. Vincente being a Level 2 ELL student will need modifications as well. I would tell the teacher to also allow Vincente to answer orally after each question is read to him for the objective assessment. I would also suggest shortening the test length to seven questions on this section and I would create an alternate assessment with more obvious answers, easier examples and/or limited answer choices. To modify the performance section and follow Vincente’s IEP, I would suggest that the teacher provide sentence stems for Vincente and shorten the sentences as much as possible. This would ensure that the teacher is following the Level 2 ELL support and still assessing Vincente’s ability to complete the objective. Justification For Mingyu, allowing her to answer orally after having been read the question aloud gives her a chance to use her understanding of the oral discourse to her best ability. By shortening this portion the teacher would be decreasing the chances for Mingyu to get the multiple terms confused with one another which will ensure that the content covered on her assessment will align with the content from the lesson and will help her to demonstrate mastery of standards 6 and 3. During the performance section of the assessment Mingyu will benefit by only being required to write one sentence because it will allow her to focus on making sure this one sentence is as correct as it can be and will remove the opportunity for excess errors. She will also be selecting one figurative term that she is most comfortable with and writing about the

subject she is most familiar with. Also, by adjusting the rubric to accommodate the extra support needed for ELL learners such as Mingyu, the teacher can ensure that Mingyu will receive an accurate assessment overall and help her to master standards 6, 12 and 13. For Vincente, had the teacher created a separate objective portion of the assessment for him, read it aloud, then allowed him to answer orally, he would have performed much better. Less questions will lessen the opportunities to answer incorrectly and by reading aloud the questions that the teacher created specifically for Vincente and providing him only two answer choices will increase the chances for him to be successful in the objective portion of the assessment. These modifications will increase Vincente’s chances of being successful and mastering standards 6 and 3. During the performance portion, Vincente will do well with the sentence stems because he understands “academic English with hesitancy and difficulty.” The sentence stems will provide him a starting point to get his ideas going and will enable him to complete the standards 6, 12, and 13.