Orbit Stability and Kepler's Problem: Circular Orbits, Power Laws, and Bertrand's Theorem , Study notes of Physics

The stability of circular orbits in celestial mechanics through the analysis of kepler's problem. Topics include the differential equation for the orbit, bertrand's theorem, and power law stability. The document also discusses the relationship between circular orbit stability and power laws, as well as deviating circles and harmonic motion.

Typology: Study notes

Pre 2010

Uploaded on 03/28/2010

koofers-user-nkb
koofers-user-nkb 🇺🇸

3.5

(2)

10 documents

1 / 15

Toggle sidebar

This page cannot be seen from the preview

Don't miss anything!

bg1
Lecture 10 Outline - Kepler
Diff. Eqn. for the orbit (Section 3.5)
Bertrand’s Theorem (Section 3.6)
The Kepler Problem (Sections 3.7, 3.8)
pf3
pf4
pf5
pf8
pf9
pfa
pfd
pfe
pff

Partial preview of the text

Download Orbit Stability and Kepler's Problem: Circular Orbits, Power Laws, and Bertrand's Theorem and more Study notes Physics in PDF only on Docsity!

Lecture 10 Outline - Kepler

Diff. Eqn. for the orbit (Section 3.5)

Bertrand’s Theorem (Section 3.6)

The Kepler Problem (Sections 3.7, 3.8)

Circular Orbit Stability

Which orbits retrace their steps?

Obviously circles (

dt^ dr

) at radius where

V

ef f

is at

minima given

`

and

E

V

ef f

r 0 ) =

V

r 0 ) +

`

2 / 2 mr

(^02)

f ef f

r 0 ) =

∂r ∂V

r 0

= 0

thus

f (^) ( r 0 ) =

`

2

mr

(^03)

Two cases depending on whether minima or maxima:

Deviate Circles

harmonic motionDeviating slightly from circular motion gives rise to

u = u 0 + α

(^) cos(

βθ

/r

OR

r = r 0 + α

(^) cos(

βθ

Here

α

depends on deviation of energy

E

and

β

from first-order Taylor expansion of

f (^) ( r )

at

r

0

Bertrand’s Theorem

Anyways, can

somehow

show that for

r = r 0 + α

(^) cos(

βθ

Condition for a closed orbital depends on

β

β

r 0

f 0

∂r^ ∂f

r 0

andcanalsoshow

f (^) ( r ) =

k

r 3 − β 2

If rational number

β

p/q

with integers

p, q

After

q

revolutions

cos(

pθ/q

) = cos(

πp

Second-order can show that only

β

are stable

f (^) ( r ) =

k

r 3 −

β 2

either

f (^) ( r ) =

r k 2

OR

f (^) ( r ) =

kr

inverse-square and Hooke’s law”.have closed orbitals for all bound particles areBertrand’s Theorem (1873) ”only central forces that

Inverse Square Law

f (^) ( r ) =

r k 2

and thus

V

r ) =

k/r

Several ways to integrate the eqn for orbit, eg.

f (^) ( r ) =

r k 2

`

2

r 2

d

`

2

mr

2

dθ dr

`

2

mr

3

however, Goldstein

knows

that the indefinite integral

dx

α

βx

γx

2

γ

cos

1

(

β

γx

β

2

αγ

θ = θ ′ − ∫

du

2 ` mE 2

2 mku ` 2 − u 2 = θ ′ −

cos

1

 

` 2 u

mk

2 E`

2

mk

2

 

Note

θ

is a constant of integration. Thus rearranging

Equation of

r 2

Orbit

Contains

E, `, θ

three constants of integration

Note

θ ′

is also the turning angle!

r 1

mk ` 2

E`

2

mk

2

cos(

θ − θ ′ ) )

The (missing) fourth specifies the location on orbit

θ 0

...

which we need to find

r ( t ) , θ

t )

again we can use

mr

2 dθ

`dt

Semimajor Axis of Ellipse (Relation)

So the eccentricity

e

=

2 E`

2

k 2

Motion in time (for

F

r

k/r

Fairly simple, using conservation

`dt

mr

2 dθ

again:

where we throw in

r 1

=

mk ` 2

e

cos(

θ

θ ′ ))

t

=

m 2

r

r 0

dr

r k

` 2

2 mr

2 + E = ` 3

mk

2

θ

θ 0

e

cos(

θ

θ ′ ))

2

BUT either integrals to give

r

( t ) , θ

t )

are tough!

Elliptical Motion in time (for

F

r

k/r

Only approximately true